Amanda J. Holder, Rebecca Wilson, Jeanette Whitaker, Paul Robson
{"title":"芒草土壤碳储量的基因型差异:对植物固碳和育种的启示","authors":"Amanda J. Holder, Rebecca Wilson, Jeanette Whitaker, Paul Robson","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biomass crops provide renewable material for bioproducts and energy generation with the potential for negative greenhouse gas emissions through bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. <i>Miscanthus</i> spp. is a perennial crop with rapid biomass production and low inputs. However, uncertainty exists over impacts on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in conversion from agricultural grasslands, and the interaction between divergent <i>Miscanthus</i> species and SOC sequestration. As a C<sub>4</sub> plant (in contrast to C<sub>3</sub> temperate grassland species) the fate of <i>Miscanthus</i> derived carbon can be traced in the soil through its isotopic signature. Taking advantage of this, we use soil cores (pre and post conversion) to investigate species groupings and genotypic effect on SOC stocks in a rare long-term field trial located in the UK. Results show that 10 years after conversion from a managed grass pasture to <i>Miscanthus</i>, expected SOC losses due to cultivation were recovered (<i>Miscanthus</i> spp. mean of 82 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to pre-conversion stocks of 79 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>, 0–30 cm soil depth) but significant variation in SOC between genotypes was observed (a difference of 32 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> between the highest and lowest). Of the plant traits investigated, a large rhizome mass was correlated with C<sub>4</sub> carbon, and leaf litter was associated with increased SOC. As well as providing empirical data for the impact on SOC in a likely land use conversion, our findings show a genotypic influence on SOC sequestration processes, revealing the potential of <i>Miscanthus</i> selection to maximise climate mitigation benefits. With only 2 of the 13 genotypes identified as sequestering lower SOC compared to the others, there remains a wide genotypic base to select from. Yield is a primary breeding target (commercially and for increased CO<sub>2</sub> uptake); we demonstrate that high yield need not be at the expense of low soil carbon.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genotypic Differences in Soil Carbon Stocks Under Miscanthus: Implications for Carbon Sequestration and Plant Breeding\",\"authors\":\"Amanda J. Holder, Rebecca Wilson, Jeanette Whitaker, Paul Robson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Biomass crops provide renewable material for bioproducts and energy generation with the potential for negative greenhouse gas emissions through bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. <i>Miscanthus</i> spp. is a perennial crop with rapid biomass production and low inputs. However, uncertainty exists over impacts on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in conversion from agricultural grasslands, and the interaction between divergent <i>Miscanthus</i> species and SOC sequestration. As a C<sub>4</sub> plant (in contrast to C<sub>3</sub> temperate grassland species) the fate of <i>Miscanthus</i> derived carbon can be traced in the soil through its isotopic signature. Taking advantage of this, we use soil cores (pre and post conversion) to investigate species groupings and genotypic effect on SOC stocks in a rare long-term field trial located in the UK. Results show that 10 years after conversion from a managed grass pasture to <i>Miscanthus</i>, expected SOC losses due to cultivation were recovered (<i>Miscanthus</i> spp. mean of 82 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to pre-conversion stocks of 79 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>, 0–30 cm soil depth) but significant variation in SOC between genotypes was observed (a difference of 32 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> between the highest and lowest). Of the plant traits investigated, a large rhizome mass was correlated with C<sub>4</sub> carbon, and leaf litter was associated with increased SOC. As well as providing empirical data for the impact on SOC in a likely land use conversion, our findings show a genotypic influence on SOC sequestration processes, revealing the potential of <i>Miscanthus</i> selection to maximise climate mitigation benefits. With only 2 of the 13 genotypes identified as sequestering lower SOC compared to the others, there remains a wide genotypic base to select from. Yield is a primary breeding target (commercially and for increased CO<sub>2</sub> uptake); we demonstrate that high yield need not be at the expense of low soil carbon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70076\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
生物质作物为生物产品和能源生产提供可再生材料,通过具有碳捕获和储存的生物能源有可能产生负温室气体排放。芒草属多年生作物,生物量生产快,投入少。然而,农用草地对土壤有机碳(SOC)储量的影响以及不同芒草种类与SOC固存的相互作用存在不确定性。作为一种C4植物(与C3温带草原植物相比),芒草衍生碳的命运可以通过其同位素特征在土壤中追踪。利用这一点,我们利用土壤岩心(转化前和转化后)在英国进行了一项罕见的长期野外试验,研究了物种分组和基因型对有机碳储量的影响。结果表明,从管理草场转变为芒草10年后,由于种植造成的预期有机碳损失得到了恢复(芒草种平均为82 Mg C ha - 1,而转化前的储量为79 Mg C ha - 1,土壤深度为0-30 cm),但不同基因型之间的有机碳差异显著(最高和最低差异为32 Mg C ha - 1)。在所调查的植物性状中,根茎质量大与C4碳含量相关,凋落叶与有机碳含量增加相关。除了为可能的土地利用转换对有机碳的影响提供经验数据外,我们的研究结果还显示了对有机碳封存过程的基因型影响,揭示了芒草选择最大化气候减缓效益的潜力。在13个基因型中,只有2个基因型的固碳能力比其他基因型低,因此仍有广泛的基因型可供选择。产量是主要的育种目标(商业上和增加二氧化碳吸收量);我们证明,高产不一定以低土壤碳为代价。
Genotypic Differences in Soil Carbon Stocks Under Miscanthus: Implications for Carbon Sequestration and Plant Breeding
Biomass crops provide renewable material for bioproducts and energy generation with the potential for negative greenhouse gas emissions through bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Miscanthus spp. is a perennial crop with rapid biomass production and low inputs. However, uncertainty exists over impacts on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in conversion from agricultural grasslands, and the interaction between divergent Miscanthus species and SOC sequestration. As a C4 plant (in contrast to C3 temperate grassland species) the fate of Miscanthus derived carbon can be traced in the soil through its isotopic signature. Taking advantage of this, we use soil cores (pre and post conversion) to investigate species groupings and genotypic effect on SOC stocks in a rare long-term field trial located in the UK. Results show that 10 years after conversion from a managed grass pasture to Miscanthus, expected SOC losses due to cultivation were recovered (Miscanthus spp. mean of 82 Mg C ha−1 compared to pre-conversion stocks of 79 Mg C ha−1, 0–30 cm soil depth) but significant variation in SOC between genotypes was observed (a difference of 32 Mg C ha−1 between the highest and lowest). Of the plant traits investigated, a large rhizome mass was correlated with C4 carbon, and leaf litter was associated with increased SOC. As well as providing empirical data for the impact on SOC in a likely land use conversion, our findings show a genotypic influence on SOC sequestration processes, revealing the potential of Miscanthus selection to maximise climate mitigation benefits. With only 2 of the 13 genotypes identified as sequestering lower SOC compared to the others, there remains a wide genotypic base to select from. Yield is a primary breeding target (commercially and for increased CO2 uptake); we demonstrate that high yield need not be at the expense of low soil carbon.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.