癫痫、功能性神经障碍和其他阵发性疾病的诊断筛查:一项临床调查研究

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Dominique Eden , Philippa J. Karoly , Benjamin H. Brinkmann , Brian N. Lundstrom , Nicholas M. Gregg , Ewan S. Nurse , Jeff R. Anderson , John D. Halamka , Dean R. Freestone
{"title":"癫痫、功能性神经障碍和其他阵发性疾病的诊断筛查:一项临床调查研究","authors":"Dominique Eden ,&nbsp;Philippa J. Karoly ,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Brinkmann ,&nbsp;Brian N. Lundstrom ,&nbsp;Nicholas M. Gregg ,&nbsp;Ewan S. Nurse ,&nbsp;Jeff R. Anderson ,&nbsp;John D. Halamka ,&nbsp;Dean R. Freestone","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Seizures, or seizure-like events, can indicate over 50 neurological disorders, and interpretation of patient-reported symptoms is subjective, leading to misdiagnosis. This study aimed to determine diagnostic utility of multi-choice questions to assess seizures in a clinical setting.</div></div><div><h3>Patients &amp; methods</h3><div>This retrospective study of Mayo Clinic neurology patients (2016 – 2021) analysed de-identified Electronic Health Records from adults with a paroxysmal disorder who completed Mayo Clinic’s ‘Epilepsy Pre-screening Questionnaire’. Diagnostic groups were epilepsy, functional neurological disorder (FND), syncope, and other neurological disorders. The main outcome was group-level separability of survey responses between diagnostic groups (assessed from response proportions using a chi-squared test with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>4,130 records were included for epilepsy (n = 3,194), FND (n = 214), syncope (n = 101), other (n = 621). Seven multichoice questions provided significant separability between diagnostic groups, with event duration, specific warnings and symptoms providing greatest diagnostic utility. Those with syncope were significantly more likely to report short events, of a few seconds, compared to every other group (syncope: 27 %, other: 11 %, epilepsy: 9 %, FND: 1 %). People with FND were also significantly more likely to report events &gt; 7 min (27 %), compared to those with epilepsy (11 %). Conversely, events lasting &lt; 1 min were still reported by 23 % of people with FND and long seizures (&gt;7 mins) were reported by almost 10 % of people with epilepsy. Pre-seizure warnings were similar for focal and generalised epilepsy, contradicting the assumption that auras are mainly associated with focal epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results validate the diagnostic utility of general questions about event duration, related symptoms and comorbidities in a meaningfully sampled patient cohort that was representative of people presenting with seizures or seizure-like events presumed to be epilepsy (i.e. not people presenting with an obvious diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures). Findings could inform development of standardised, patient-reported surveys to aid differential diagnosis across common neurological conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 110672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic screening for epilepsy, functional neurological disorder, and other paroxysmal disorders: A clinical survey study\",\"authors\":\"Dominique Eden ,&nbsp;Philippa J. Karoly ,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Brinkmann ,&nbsp;Brian N. Lundstrom ,&nbsp;Nicholas M. Gregg ,&nbsp;Ewan S. Nurse ,&nbsp;Jeff R. Anderson ,&nbsp;John D. Halamka ,&nbsp;Dean R. Freestone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Seizures, or seizure-like events, can indicate over 50 neurological disorders, and interpretation of patient-reported symptoms is subjective, leading to misdiagnosis. This study aimed to determine diagnostic utility of multi-choice questions to assess seizures in a clinical setting.</div></div><div><h3>Patients &amp; methods</h3><div>This retrospective study of Mayo Clinic neurology patients (2016 – 2021) analysed de-identified Electronic Health Records from adults with a paroxysmal disorder who completed Mayo Clinic’s ‘Epilepsy Pre-screening Questionnaire’. Diagnostic groups were epilepsy, functional neurological disorder (FND), syncope, and other neurological disorders. The main outcome was group-level separability of survey responses between diagnostic groups (assessed from response proportions using a chi-squared test with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>4,130 records were included for epilepsy (n = 3,194), FND (n = 214), syncope (n = 101), other (n = 621). Seven multichoice questions provided significant separability between diagnostic groups, with event duration, specific warnings and symptoms providing greatest diagnostic utility. Those with syncope were significantly more likely to report short events, of a few seconds, compared to every other group (syncope: 27 %, other: 11 %, epilepsy: 9 %, FND: 1 %). People with FND were also significantly more likely to report events &gt; 7 min (27 %), compared to those with epilepsy (11 %). Conversely, events lasting &lt; 1 min were still reported by 23 % of people with FND and long seizures (&gt;7 mins) were reported by almost 10 % of people with epilepsy. Pre-seizure warnings were similar for focal and generalised epilepsy, contradicting the assumption that auras are mainly associated with focal epilepsy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results validate the diagnostic utility of general questions about event duration, related symptoms and comorbidities in a meaningfully sampled patient cohort that was representative of people presenting with seizures or seizure-like events presumed to be epilepsy (i.e. not people presenting with an obvious diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures). Findings could inform development of standardised, patient-reported surveys to aid differential diagnosis across common neurological conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025004123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025004123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

癫痫发作或癫痫样事件可提示50多种神经系统疾病,对患者报告的症状的解释是主观的,导致误诊。本研究的目的是确定诊断效用的选择问题,以评估癫痫发作在临床设置。患者&方法:这项对梅奥诊所神经病学患者(2016 - 2021)的回顾性研究分析了完成梅奥诊所“癫痫预筛查问卷”的阵发性疾病成人的去识别电子健康记录。诊断组为癫痫、功能性神经障碍(FND)、晕厥和其他神经障碍。主要结果是诊断组之间调查反应的组水平可分离性(使用卡方检验和多重比较的Holm-Sidak校正从反应比例评估)。结果癫痫(3194例)、FND(214例)、晕厥(101例)、其他(621例)共4130例。七个选择题在诊断组之间提供了显著的可分离性,事件持续时间、特定警告和症状提供了最大的诊断效用。与其他组相比,晕厥患者更有可能报告几秒钟的短暂事件(晕厥:27%,其他:11%,癫痫:9%,FND: 1%)。与癫痫患者(11%)相比,FND患者也更有可能在7分钟内报告事件(27%)。相反,23%的FND患者报告持续1分钟的事件,近10%的癫痫患者报告长时间癫痫发作(7分钟)。局灶性癫痫和全身性癫痫的发作前警告相似,这与先兆主要与局灶性癫痫相关的假设相矛盾。结论:研究结果验证了事件持续时间、相关症状和合并症等一般性问题在有意义的抽样患者队列中的诊断效用,这些患者具有癫痫发作或癫痫样事件的代表性,被认为是癫痫(即没有明显诊断为非癫痫发作的患者)。研究结果可以为标准化、患者报告调查的发展提供信息,以帮助对常见神经系统疾病进行鉴别诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic screening for epilepsy, functional neurological disorder, and other paroxysmal disorders: A clinical survey study

Objective

Seizures, or seizure-like events, can indicate over 50 neurological disorders, and interpretation of patient-reported symptoms is subjective, leading to misdiagnosis. This study aimed to determine diagnostic utility of multi-choice questions to assess seizures in a clinical setting.

Patients & methods

This retrospective study of Mayo Clinic neurology patients (2016 – 2021) analysed de-identified Electronic Health Records from adults with a paroxysmal disorder who completed Mayo Clinic’s ‘Epilepsy Pre-screening Questionnaire’. Diagnostic groups were epilepsy, functional neurological disorder (FND), syncope, and other neurological disorders. The main outcome was group-level separability of survey responses between diagnostic groups (assessed from response proportions using a chi-squared test with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons).

Results

4,130 records were included for epilepsy (n = 3,194), FND (n = 214), syncope (n = 101), other (n = 621). Seven multichoice questions provided significant separability between diagnostic groups, with event duration, specific warnings and symptoms providing greatest diagnostic utility. Those with syncope were significantly more likely to report short events, of a few seconds, compared to every other group (syncope: 27 %, other: 11 %, epilepsy: 9 %, FND: 1 %). People with FND were also significantly more likely to report events > 7 min (27 %), compared to those with epilepsy (11 %). Conversely, events lasting < 1 min were still reported by 23 % of people with FND and long seizures (>7 mins) were reported by almost 10 % of people with epilepsy. Pre-seizure warnings were similar for focal and generalised epilepsy, contradicting the assumption that auras are mainly associated with focal epilepsy.

Conclusion

The results validate the diagnostic utility of general questions about event duration, related symptoms and comorbidities in a meaningfully sampled patient cohort that was representative of people presenting with seizures or seizure-like events presumed to be epilepsy (i.e. not people presenting with an obvious diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures). Findings could inform development of standardised, patient-reported surveys to aid differential diagnosis across common neurological conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信