政治访问和外国直接投资

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Eunbi Kim
{"title":"政治访问和外国直接投资","authors":"Eunbi Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Institutionalists agree that multinational enterprises (MNEs) can increase their adaptability to political risk and uncertainty and improve firm performance in foreign locations utilizing political capabilities developed in their home country. However, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the ways in which host governments incentivize foreign investment by boosting MNEs’ political capabilities. Based on the data on foreign political leaders’ visits made to South Korea (hereafter Korea) and Korean outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) to their countries (2013–2021), we examine how inward political visits serve as a strategic instrument that promotes OFDI. We also explore whether institutional distance moderates the impacts of political visits and how the impacts differ by political power of the host country relative to that of the home country and by political leader tenure left in the countries involved. Our findings show that inward political visits increase the amount of OFDI to the visiting countries but that institutional distance serves as a negative moderator. We also find evidence that political visits have a greater positive impact on OFDI when the visiting country holds less political power than a partner country and when political leaders have longer tenure left in both countries. Our study contributes to literatures on the precedents of FDI and the roles of nonmarket factors (i.e., governmental initiatives) in internationalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 115657"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political visits and foreign direct investment\",\"authors\":\"Eunbi Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Institutionalists agree that multinational enterprises (MNEs) can increase their adaptability to political risk and uncertainty and improve firm performance in foreign locations utilizing political capabilities developed in their home country. However, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the ways in which host governments incentivize foreign investment by boosting MNEs’ political capabilities. Based on the data on foreign political leaders’ visits made to South Korea (hereafter Korea) and Korean outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) to their countries (2013–2021), we examine how inward political visits serve as a strategic instrument that promotes OFDI. We also explore whether institutional distance moderates the impacts of political visits and how the impacts differ by political power of the host country relative to that of the home country and by political leader tenure left in the countries involved. Our findings show that inward political visits increase the amount of OFDI to the visiting countries but that institutional distance serves as a negative moderator. We also find evidence that political visits have a greater positive impact on OFDI when the visiting country holds less political power than a partner country and when political leaders have longer tenure left in both countries. Our study contributes to literatures on the precedents of FDI and the roles of nonmarket factors (i.e., governmental initiatives) in internationalization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004801\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004801","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制度主义者认为,跨国企业可以利用在本国发展起来的政治能力,提高对政治风险和不确定性的适应能力,并改善公司在国外的绩效。然而,令人惊讶的是,很少有人关注东道国政府如何通过提高跨国公司的政治能力来激励外国投资。基于外国政治领导人访问韩国(以下简称韩国)和韩国对外直接投资(OFDI)的数据(2013-2021年),我们研究了政治访问如何作为促进对外直接投资的战略工具。我们还探讨了制度距离是否会调节政治访问的影响,以及东道国相对于母国的政治权力以及所涉及国家的政治领导人任期如何影响。研究结果表明,政治访问增加了对外直接投资的数量,但制度距离起到负向调节作用。我们还发现有证据表明,当访问国的政治权力低于伙伴国,以及政治领导人在两国的任期较长时,政治访问对对外直接投资的积极影响更大。我们的研究有助于研究FDI的先例以及非市场因素(即政府举措)在国际化中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political visits and foreign direct investment
Institutionalists agree that multinational enterprises (MNEs) can increase their adaptability to political risk and uncertainty and improve firm performance in foreign locations utilizing political capabilities developed in their home country. However, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the ways in which host governments incentivize foreign investment by boosting MNEs’ political capabilities. Based on the data on foreign political leaders’ visits made to South Korea (hereafter Korea) and Korean outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) to their countries (2013–2021), we examine how inward political visits serve as a strategic instrument that promotes OFDI. We also explore whether institutional distance moderates the impacts of political visits and how the impacts differ by political power of the host country relative to that of the home country and by political leader tenure left in the countries involved. Our findings show that inward political visits increase the amount of OFDI to the visiting countries but that institutional distance serves as a negative moderator. We also find evidence that political visits have a greater positive impact on OFDI when the visiting country holds less political power than a partner country and when political leaders have longer tenure left in both countries. Our study contributes to literatures on the precedents of FDI and the roles of nonmarket factors (i.e., governmental initiatives) in internationalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信