基于贝叶斯最优最差法和地理信息系统的有机废物中央堆肥设施选择:以伊斯坦布尔为例

IF 5.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mustafa Güler , Mesut Samastı , Melih Yücesan , Muhammet Gül , Erkan Çelik , Miraç Nur Ciner , Ömer Algorabi
{"title":"基于贝叶斯最优最差法和地理信息系统的有机废物中央堆肥设施选择:以伊斯坦布尔为例","authors":"Mustafa Güler ,&nbsp;Mesut Samastı ,&nbsp;Melih Yücesan ,&nbsp;Muhammet Gül ,&nbsp;Erkan Çelik ,&nbsp;Miraç Nur Ciner ,&nbsp;Ömer Algorabi","doi":"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid increase in municipal solid waste (MSW) generation, driven by population growth and unplanned urbanization, has made the location of organic waste collection and disposal facilities a critical issue for metropolitan cities. Improper waste management practices threaten environmental sustainability, human health, and urban futures. This study applies multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to identify the optimal placement for a central composting facility in Istanbul. A novel MCDM mechanism was developed, building on existing methods and addressing a gap in the literature. While determining the criteria, academic studies on this subject were researched in depth and the criteria used in these studies were brought together to obtain 28 criteria. The study assessed 28 criteria using the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (BWM) to determine their relative importance. These weights were then integrated into a Geographic Information System (GIS) to produce a suitability map, highlighting the most appropriate locations for the facility. Based on this analysis, the Çatalca Karacabey region was identified as the optimal site, ensuring reduced environmental impact and improved efficiency in organic waste management. The study contributes both theoretically and practically to the field, offering a robust framework for sustainable waste facility siting and providing actionable insights for urban governance. The study provides valuable insights for facility siting and urban governance, while highlighting areas for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48609,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 102175"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of the central composting facility for organic wastes through the Bayesian best worst method and Geographic information system incorporation: The case of Istanbul\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Güler ,&nbsp;Mesut Samastı ,&nbsp;Melih Yücesan ,&nbsp;Muhammet Gül ,&nbsp;Erkan Çelik ,&nbsp;Miraç Nur Ciner ,&nbsp;Ömer Algorabi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rapid increase in municipal solid waste (MSW) generation, driven by population growth and unplanned urbanization, has made the location of organic waste collection and disposal facilities a critical issue for metropolitan cities. Improper waste management practices threaten environmental sustainability, human health, and urban futures. This study applies multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to identify the optimal placement for a central composting facility in Istanbul. A novel MCDM mechanism was developed, building on existing methods and addressing a gap in the literature. While determining the criteria, academic studies on this subject were researched in depth and the criteria used in these studies were brought together to obtain 28 criteria. The study assessed 28 criteria using the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (BWM) to determine their relative importance. These weights were then integrated into a Geographic Information System (GIS) to produce a suitability map, highlighting the most appropriate locations for the facility. Based on this analysis, the Çatalca Karacabey region was identified as the optimal site, ensuring reduced environmental impact and improved efficiency in organic waste management. The study contributes both theoretically and practically to the field, offering a robust framework for sustainable waste facility siting and providing actionable insights for urban governance. The study provides valuable insights for facility siting and urban governance, while highlighting areas for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625002307\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098625002307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人口增长和无计划城市化的推动下,城市固体废物(MSW)的产生迅速增加,使得有机废物收集和处理设施的选址成为大城市的一个关键问题。不当的废物管理做法威胁到环境的可持续性、人类健康和城市的未来。本研究应用多标准决策(MCDM)方法来确定伊斯坦布尔中央堆肥设施的最佳位置。在现有方法的基础上,研究人员开发了一种新的MCDM机制,并解决了文献中的空白。在确定标准的同时,深入研究了这一主题的学术研究,并将这些研究中使用的标准汇总在一起,得到了28个标准。该研究使用贝叶斯最佳-最差法(BWM)评估了28个标准,以确定它们的相对重要性。然后将这些权重整合到地理信息系统(GIS)中,生成适合性地图,突出显示设施的最合适位置。基于这一分析,Çatalca Karacabey地区被确定为最佳地点,确保减少对环境的影响并提高有机废物管理的效率。该研究为该领域的理论和实践做出了贡献,为可持续的废物设施选址提供了强有力的框架,并为城市治理提供了可行的见解。该研究为设施选址和城市治理提供了有价值的见解,同时突出了未来研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection of the central composting facility for organic wastes through the Bayesian best worst method and Geographic information system incorporation: The case of Istanbul
The rapid increase in municipal solid waste (MSW) generation, driven by population growth and unplanned urbanization, has made the location of organic waste collection and disposal facilities a critical issue for metropolitan cities. Improper waste management practices threaten environmental sustainability, human health, and urban futures. This study applies multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to identify the optimal placement for a central composting facility in Istanbul. A novel MCDM mechanism was developed, building on existing methods and addressing a gap in the literature. While determining the criteria, academic studies on this subject were researched in depth and the criteria used in these studies were brought together to obtain 28 criteria. The study assessed 28 criteria using the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (BWM) to determine their relative importance. These weights were then integrated into a Geographic Information System (GIS) to produce a suitability map, highlighting the most appropriate locations for the facility. Based on this analysis, the Çatalca Karacabey region was identified as the optimal site, ensuring reduced environmental impact and improved efficiency in organic waste management. The study contributes both theoretically and practically to the field, offering a robust framework for sustainable waste facility siting and providing actionable insights for urban governance. The study provides valuable insights for facility siting and urban governance, while highlighting areas for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech
Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech Materials Science-Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (JESTECH) (formerly Technology), a peer-reviewed quarterly engineering journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental high quality papers of permanent interest, not previously published in journals, in the field of engineering and applied science which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology and engineering. In addition to peer-reviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, state-of-the-art reviews and communications in the broadly defined field of engineering science and technology. The scope of JESTECH includes a wide spectrum of subjects including: -Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering (Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation; Coding, Cryptography, and Information Protection; Communications, Networks, Mobile Computing and Distributed Systems; Compilers and Operating Systems; Computer Architecture, Parallel Processing, and Dependability; Computer Vision and Robotics; Control Theory; Electromagnetic Waves, Microwave Techniques and Antennas; Embedded Systems; Integrated Circuits, VLSI Design, Testing, and CAD; Microelectromechanical Systems; Microelectronics, and Electronic Devices and Circuits; Power, Energy and Energy Conversion Systems; Signal, Image, and Speech Processing) -Mechanical and Civil Engineering (Automotive Technologies; Biomechanics; Construction Materials; Design and Manufacturing; Dynamics and Control; Energy Generation, Utilization, Conversion, and Storage; Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics; Heat and Mass Transfer; Micro-Nano Sciences; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technologies; Robotics and Mechatronics; Solid Mechanics and Structure; Thermal Sciences) -Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (Advanced Materials Science; Biomaterials; Ceramic and Inorgnanic Materials; Electronic-Magnetic Materials; Energy and Environment; Materials Characterizastion; Metallurgy; Polymers and Nanocomposites)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信