{"title":"能效信用指引能否推动企业低碳技术创新?来自中国的证据","authors":"Jian Jin , Su Xu , Bei Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research takes China's “Energy Efficiency Credit Guidelines (EECG)” as a quasi-natural experiment and uses the propensity score matching-difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) method to examine the impact of incentive-based energy efficiency credit policies on corporate low-carbon technological innovation. The research finds that the EECG have exerted a positive incentive effect, promoted corporate low-carbon technological innovation and showed a trend of “improving quantity and increasing quality.” Mechanism analysis shows that the EECG mainly incentivize low-carbon technological innovation by promoting financing competition among firms, inhibiting corporate financialization, attracting green investors, and strengthening firms' awareness of climate risks. Moderating effect analysis reveals that climate policy uncertainty has an inverted U-shaped moderating effect on the policy effectiveness of the EECG. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the innovation incentive effect of energy efficiency credit is stronger in firms with executives having environmental backgrounds, technology-intensive firms, and firms located in regions with lower levels of informal financial development. Finally, the promotion of low-carbon technological innovation by the EECG further optimizes firms' ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108855"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can energy efficiency credit guidelines boost enterprises' low-carbon technological innovation? Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Jian Jin , Su Xu , Bei Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research takes China's “Energy Efficiency Credit Guidelines (EECG)” as a quasi-natural experiment and uses the propensity score matching-difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) method to examine the impact of incentive-based energy efficiency credit policies on corporate low-carbon technological innovation. The research finds that the EECG have exerted a positive incentive effect, promoted corporate low-carbon technological innovation and showed a trend of “improving quantity and increasing quality.” Mechanism analysis shows that the EECG mainly incentivize low-carbon technological innovation by promoting financing competition among firms, inhibiting corporate financialization, attracting green investors, and strengthening firms' awareness of climate risks. Moderating effect analysis reveals that climate policy uncertainty has an inverted U-shaped moderating effect on the policy effectiveness of the EECG. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the innovation incentive effect of energy efficiency credit is stronger in firms with executives having environmental backgrounds, technology-intensive firms, and firms located in regions with lower levels of informal financial development. Finally, the promotion of low-carbon technological innovation by the EECG further optimizes firms' ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006826\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can energy efficiency credit guidelines boost enterprises' low-carbon technological innovation? Evidence from China
This research takes China's “Energy Efficiency Credit Guidelines (EECG)” as a quasi-natural experiment and uses the propensity score matching-difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) method to examine the impact of incentive-based energy efficiency credit policies on corporate low-carbon technological innovation. The research finds that the EECG have exerted a positive incentive effect, promoted corporate low-carbon technological innovation and showed a trend of “improving quantity and increasing quality.” Mechanism analysis shows that the EECG mainly incentivize low-carbon technological innovation by promoting financing competition among firms, inhibiting corporate financialization, attracting green investors, and strengthening firms' awareness of climate risks. Moderating effect analysis reveals that climate policy uncertainty has an inverted U-shaped moderating effect on the policy effectiveness of the EECG. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the innovation incentive effect of energy efficiency credit is stronger in firms with executives having environmental backgrounds, technology-intensive firms, and firms located in regions with lower levels of informal financial development. Finally, the promotion of low-carbon technological innovation by the EECG further optimizes firms' ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.