在约克郡的传统和补充保健使用的预测因素分析

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine
Felicity Astin , Elizabeth Goyder , Richard Cooper , John Stephenson , Farideh A. Javid
{"title":"在约克郡的传统和补充保健使用的预测因素分析","authors":"Felicity Astin ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Goyder ,&nbsp;Richard Cooper ,&nbsp;John Stephenson ,&nbsp;Farideh A. Javid","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2025.100566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Well-recognised trends in types of services used by patients exist within health service utilisation. One increasing area is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); considered distinct from the use of health professionals working in conventional medicine. Little is known about the contribution of CAM and whether people using CAM with multiple comorbidities make correspondingly less use of conventional health services.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>1) To describe self-reported visits to conventional health professionals and CAM practitioners, and to identify predictors of such visits; 2) To quantify the effect of demographic, health-related and CAM service take-up factors on contact with health services delivered by conventional health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 70,836 participants in the Yorkshire Health Study, a large-scale population-based cohort study, was analysed descriptively and inferentially to test for associations between variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>3.5 % of the cohort reported accessing CAM services in the previous three months. Level of contact with conventional health professionals was higher in those accessing practitioner-led CAM services (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.28; <em>p &lt; 0.001.) Female gender, older age and increased incidence of mental and physical health conditions were also positively associated with the outcome.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Self-reported utilisation of CAM services was low but there were several predictors of recent CAM use based on demographic and health conditions which may be of help in understanding conventional and CAM healthcare utilisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":"12 4","pages":"Article 100566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of predictors of conventional and complementary healthcare use in Yorkshire\",\"authors\":\"Felicity Astin ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Goyder ,&nbsp;Richard Cooper ,&nbsp;John Stephenson ,&nbsp;Farideh A. Javid\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aimed.2025.100566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Well-recognised trends in types of services used by patients exist within health service utilisation. One increasing area is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); considered distinct from the use of health professionals working in conventional medicine. Little is known about the contribution of CAM and whether people using CAM with multiple comorbidities make correspondingly less use of conventional health services.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>1) To describe self-reported visits to conventional health professionals and CAM practitioners, and to identify predictors of such visits; 2) To quantify the effect of demographic, health-related and CAM service take-up factors on contact with health services delivered by conventional health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 70,836 participants in the Yorkshire Health Study, a large-scale population-based cohort study, was analysed descriptively and inferentially to test for associations between variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>3.5 % of the cohort reported accessing CAM services in the previous three months. Level of contact with conventional health professionals was higher in those accessing practitioner-led CAM services (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.28; <em>p &lt; 0.001.) Female gender, older age and increased incidence of mental and physical health conditions were also positively associated with the outcome.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Self-reported utilisation of CAM services was low but there were several predictors of recent CAM use based on demographic and health conditions which may be of help in understanding conventional and CAM healthcare utilisation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958825001259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958825001259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在卫生服务利用方面,患者使用的服务类型存在公认的趋势。一个日益增长的领域是补充和替代医学(CAM);被认为不同于使用从事传统医学工作的卫生专业人员。人们对辅助生殖疗法的作用知之甚少,也不清楚患有多种合并症的辅助生殖疗法患者是否相应减少了对传统卫生服务的使用。目的1)描述自我报告的常规卫生专业人员和辅助医学从业人员的就诊情况,并确定此类就诊的预测因素;2)量化人口统计学、健康相关和辅助医学服务接受因素对接触传统卫生专业人员提供的卫生服务的影响。方法对约克郡健康研究70,836名参与者的数据进行描述性和推断性分析,以检验变量之间的相关性。结果3.5 %的队列报告在过去三个月内使用CAM服务。在接受医生主导的CAM服务的人群中,与传统卫生专业人员接触的水平较高(发病率比[IRR]=1.28; p <; 0.001)。女性性别、年龄较大以及精神和身体健康状况发生率增加也与结果呈正相关。结论自我报告的CAM服务利用率较低,但基于人口统计学和健康状况的近期CAM使用的几个预测指标可能有助于了解常规和CAM医疗保健的利用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of predictors of conventional and complementary healthcare use in Yorkshire

Background

Well-recognised trends in types of services used by patients exist within health service utilisation. One increasing area is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); considered distinct from the use of health professionals working in conventional medicine. Little is known about the contribution of CAM and whether people using CAM with multiple comorbidities make correspondingly less use of conventional health services.

Aims

1) To describe self-reported visits to conventional health professionals and CAM practitioners, and to identify predictors of such visits; 2) To quantify the effect of demographic, health-related and CAM service take-up factors on contact with health services delivered by conventional health professionals.

Methods

Data from 70,836 participants in the Yorkshire Health Study, a large-scale population-based cohort study, was analysed descriptively and inferentially to test for associations between variables.

Results

3.5 % of the cohort reported accessing CAM services in the previous three months. Level of contact with conventional health professionals was higher in those accessing practitioner-led CAM services (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.28; p < 0.001.) Female gender, older age and increased incidence of mental and physical health conditions were also positively associated with the outcome.

Conclusions

Self-reported utilisation of CAM services was low but there were several predictors of recent CAM use based on demographic and health conditions which may be of help in understanding conventional and CAM healthcare utilisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信