Felicity Astin , Elizabeth Goyder , Richard Cooper , John Stephenson , Farideh A. Javid
{"title":"在约克郡的传统和补充保健使用的预测因素分析","authors":"Felicity Astin , Elizabeth Goyder , Richard Cooper , John Stephenson , Farideh A. Javid","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2025.100566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Well-recognised trends in types of services used by patients exist within health service utilisation. One increasing area is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); considered distinct from the use of health professionals working in conventional medicine. Little is known about the contribution of CAM and whether people using CAM with multiple comorbidities make correspondingly less use of conventional health services.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>1) To describe self-reported visits to conventional health professionals and CAM practitioners, and to identify predictors of such visits; 2) To quantify the effect of demographic, health-related and CAM service take-up factors on contact with health services delivered by conventional health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 70,836 participants in the Yorkshire Health Study, a large-scale population-based cohort study, was analysed descriptively and inferentially to test for associations between variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>3.5 % of the cohort reported accessing CAM services in the previous three months. Level of contact with conventional health professionals was higher in those accessing practitioner-led CAM services (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.28; <em>p < 0.001.) Female gender, older age and increased incidence of mental and physical health conditions were also positively associated with the outcome.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Self-reported utilisation of CAM services was low but there were several predictors of recent CAM use based on demographic and health conditions which may be of help in understanding conventional and CAM healthcare utilisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":"12 4","pages":"Article 100566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of predictors of conventional and complementary healthcare use in Yorkshire\",\"authors\":\"Felicity Astin , Elizabeth Goyder , Richard Cooper , John Stephenson , Farideh A. Javid\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aimed.2025.100566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Well-recognised trends in types of services used by patients exist within health service utilisation. One increasing area is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); considered distinct from the use of health professionals working in conventional medicine. Little is known about the contribution of CAM and whether people using CAM with multiple comorbidities make correspondingly less use of conventional health services.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>1) To describe self-reported visits to conventional health professionals and CAM practitioners, and to identify predictors of such visits; 2) To quantify the effect of demographic, health-related and CAM service take-up factors on contact with health services delivered by conventional health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 70,836 participants in the Yorkshire Health Study, a large-scale population-based cohort study, was analysed descriptively and inferentially to test for associations between variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>3.5 % of the cohort reported accessing CAM services in the previous three months. Level of contact with conventional health professionals was higher in those accessing practitioner-led CAM services (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.28; <em>p < 0.001.) Female gender, older age and increased incidence of mental and physical health conditions were also positively associated with the outcome.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Self-reported utilisation of CAM services was low but there were several predictors of recent CAM use based on demographic and health conditions which may be of help in understanding conventional and CAM healthcare utilisation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in integrative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958825001259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958825001259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在卫生服务利用方面,患者使用的服务类型存在公认的趋势。一个日益增长的领域是补充和替代医学(CAM);被认为不同于使用从事传统医学工作的卫生专业人员。人们对辅助生殖疗法的作用知之甚少,也不清楚患有多种合并症的辅助生殖疗法患者是否相应减少了对传统卫生服务的使用。目的1)描述自我报告的常规卫生专业人员和辅助医学从业人员的就诊情况,并确定此类就诊的预测因素;2)量化人口统计学、健康相关和辅助医学服务接受因素对接触传统卫生专业人员提供的卫生服务的影响。方法对约克郡健康研究70,836名参与者的数据进行描述性和推断性分析,以检验变量之间的相关性。结果3.5 %的队列报告在过去三个月内使用CAM服务。在接受医生主导的CAM服务的人群中,与传统卫生专业人员接触的水平较高(发病率比[IRR]=1.28; p <; 0.001)。女性性别、年龄较大以及精神和身体健康状况发生率增加也与结果呈正相关。结论自我报告的CAM服务利用率较低,但基于人口统计学和健康状况的近期CAM使用的几个预测指标可能有助于了解常规和CAM医疗保健的利用情况。
An analysis of predictors of conventional and complementary healthcare use in Yorkshire
Background
Well-recognised trends in types of services used by patients exist within health service utilisation. One increasing area is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); considered distinct from the use of health professionals working in conventional medicine. Little is known about the contribution of CAM and whether people using CAM with multiple comorbidities make correspondingly less use of conventional health services.
Aims
1) To describe self-reported visits to conventional health professionals and CAM practitioners, and to identify predictors of such visits; 2) To quantify the effect of demographic, health-related and CAM service take-up factors on contact with health services delivered by conventional health professionals.
Methods
Data from 70,836 participants in the Yorkshire Health Study, a large-scale population-based cohort study, was analysed descriptively and inferentially to test for associations between variables.
Results
3.5 % of the cohort reported accessing CAM services in the previous three months. Level of contact with conventional health professionals was higher in those accessing practitioner-led CAM services (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.28; p < 0.001.) Female gender, older age and increased incidence of mental and physical health conditions were also positively associated with the outcome.
Conclusions
Self-reported utilisation of CAM services was low but there were several predictors of recent CAM use based on demographic and health conditions which may be of help in understanding conventional and CAM healthcare utilisation.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.