Comparison of the therapeutic effects of modified 15-mm incision minimally invasive approach with the conventional approach in the treatment of AO 23-B3 distal radius fractures

Background

The classic surgical technique of the 15-mm incision minimally invasive approach is not suitable for AO 23-B3 distal radius fractures (abbreviated B3). We have modified this technique for B3. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the modified 15-mm incision minimally invasive approach with the conventional ORIF approach in the treatment of B3.

Methods

This retrospective study included 62 patients with B3 who underwent surgical treatment from January 2020 to May 2024, including 31 patients undergoing the modified 15-mm incision minimally invasive approach (M group) and 31 patients undergoing the conventional ORIF approach (C group). The two groups had similar baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). The perioperative data, follow-up data, and imaging results of the two groups were compared. At the last follow-up, the limb function was assessed using the PRWE and DASH scores.

Results

In the C group, 1 patient experienced infection and 1 patient experienced complex regional pain syndrome, whereas in the M group, there were no such patients. In the M group, the incision length, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, swelling, and VAS on postoperative days 2 and 7, flexion-extension, ulnar-radial deviation and pronation-supination at postoperative 3 months, and pronation-supination ROM in 12–24 months of follow-up were superior, but the surgical and fluoroscopy time was longer compared to the C group (P < 0.05). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of fracture reduction, fracture healing time, full weight-bearing time, complications, and flexion-extension ROM, PRWE and DASH in the last follow-up (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both methods were effective for treating B3. The M group was superior in terms of aesthetic appeal of the incision, surgical trauma and associated risks, hospital stay, early recovery, and final rotational function, which are consistent with the principles of MIPO and rapid recovery, but requires longer surgical and fluoroscopy time.