塑造可持续的未来:经济政策和政府效率如何推动新兴经济体的环境可持续性

IF 9.5 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Abdur Rauf , Wahid Ullah , Ashfaq Ahmad Shah , Bader Alhafi Alotaibi
{"title":"塑造可持续的未来:经济政策和政府效率如何推动新兴经济体的环境可持续性","authors":"Abdur Rauf ,&nbsp;Wahid Ullah ,&nbsp;Ashfaq Ahmad Shah ,&nbsp;Bader Alhafi Alotaibi","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studying global environmental concerns is essential to understand the challenges posed by climate change. It equips individuals and policy makers with the knowledge to develop sustainable solutions and promote responsible behavior. Against this backdrop, we evaluated the role of economic policies (monetary policy and fiscal policy), government effectiveness, per capita gross domestic product, urbanization, alternative energy technology use, and access to energy within the extended IPAT model to sustain economic development and environmental quality across seven emerging economies. Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square, Driscoll-Kraay Standard Errors, Panel Corrected Standard Errors and co-integration tests were applied to extract the outcomes for the period from 2001 to 2022. Our results concluded that at individual levels and in an interaction with government effectiveness, the outcomes of economic policies are mixed. Where, real interest rate and tax revenue, individually ensure environmental sustainability but deteriorate environmental quality in the presence of government effectiveness. Money supply and government expenditure both individually and in interaction with government effectiveness discourage environmental quality in E-7 economies. the individual role of government effectiveness shows that the government of E-7 economies are inefficient in curtailing carbon emission to ensure sustainable environment. Technological progress and urbanization contribute to ensure environment quality while increased energy access, and per capita gross domestic product degrade environmental sustainability. Moreover, bidirectional causality runs money supply and government expenditure to carbon emissions, while unidirectional causality is found between government effectiveness and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, no causality is found between real interest rate and carbon emissions. Policymakers are needed to integrate environmental regulations into economic policies to ensure government effectiveness improve, rather than undermines, their carbon-reducing potential. Moreover, tax revenue and interest rates need targeted framework to maintain their benefits even as government effectiveness of the E-7 economies improves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shaping sustainable futures: How economic policies and government effectiveness drive environmental sustainability in emerging economies\",\"authors\":\"Abdur Rauf ,&nbsp;Wahid Ullah ,&nbsp;Ashfaq Ahmad Shah ,&nbsp;Bader Alhafi Alotaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Studying global environmental concerns is essential to understand the challenges posed by climate change. It equips individuals and policy makers with the knowledge to develop sustainable solutions and promote responsible behavior. Against this backdrop, we evaluated the role of economic policies (monetary policy and fiscal policy), government effectiveness, per capita gross domestic product, urbanization, alternative energy technology use, and access to energy within the extended IPAT model to sustain economic development and environmental quality across seven emerging economies. Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square, Driscoll-Kraay Standard Errors, Panel Corrected Standard Errors and co-integration tests were applied to extract the outcomes for the period from 2001 to 2022. Our results concluded that at individual levels and in an interaction with government effectiveness, the outcomes of economic policies are mixed. Where, real interest rate and tax revenue, individually ensure environmental sustainability but deteriorate environmental quality in the presence of government effectiveness. Money supply and government expenditure both individually and in interaction with government effectiveness discourage environmental quality in E-7 economies. the individual role of government effectiveness shows that the government of E-7 economies are inefficient in curtailing carbon emission to ensure sustainable environment. Technological progress and urbanization contribute to ensure environment quality while increased energy access, and per capita gross domestic product degrade environmental sustainability. Moreover, bidirectional causality runs money supply and government expenditure to carbon emissions, while unidirectional causality is found between government effectiveness and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, no causality is found between real interest rate and carbon emissions. Policymakers are needed to integrate environmental regulations into economic policies to ensure government effectiveness improve, rather than undermines, their carbon-reducing potential. Moreover, tax revenue and interest rates need targeted framework to maintain their benefits even as government effectiveness of the E-7 economies improves.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy nexus\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy nexus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究全球环境问题对于理解气候变化带来的挑战至关重要。它为个人和决策者提供了制定可持续解决方案和促进负责任行为的知识。在此背景下,我们在扩展IPAT模型中评估了经济政策(货币政策和财政政策)、政府效率、人均国内生产总值、城市化、替代能源技术使用和能源获取在维持七个新兴经济体经济发展和环境质量方面的作用。采用完全修正普通最小二乘、Driscoll-Kraay标准误差、面板校正标准误差和协整检验提取2001 - 2022年期间的结果。我们的结论是,在个人层面以及与政府效率的互动中,经济政策的结果是喜忧参半的。其中,实际利率和税收分别确保了环境的可持续性,但在政府有效性存在的情况下恶化了环境质量。在E-7经济体中,货币供应和政府支出无论是单独的还是与政府效率相互作用,都不利于环境质量。政府效能的个体作用表明,e7经济体的政府在减少碳排放以确保可持续环境方面效率低下。技术进步和城市化有助于确保环境质量,而能源获取和人均国内生产总值的增加则降低了环境的可持续性。货币供给和政府支出与碳排放之间存在双向因果关系,而政府效率与二氧化碳排放之间存在单向因果关系。然而,实际利率与碳排放之间没有因果关系。政策制定者需要将环境法规纳入经济政策,以确保政府效率提高而不是削弱其减少碳排放的潜力。此外,即使E-7经济体的政府效率有所提高,税收和利率也需要有针对性的框架来维持它们的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shaping sustainable futures: How economic policies and government effectiveness drive environmental sustainability in emerging economies
Studying global environmental concerns is essential to understand the challenges posed by climate change. It equips individuals and policy makers with the knowledge to develop sustainable solutions and promote responsible behavior. Against this backdrop, we evaluated the role of economic policies (monetary policy and fiscal policy), government effectiveness, per capita gross domestic product, urbanization, alternative energy technology use, and access to energy within the extended IPAT model to sustain economic development and environmental quality across seven emerging economies. Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square, Driscoll-Kraay Standard Errors, Panel Corrected Standard Errors and co-integration tests were applied to extract the outcomes for the period from 2001 to 2022. Our results concluded that at individual levels and in an interaction with government effectiveness, the outcomes of economic policies are mixed. Where, real interest rate and tax revenue, individually ensure environmental sustainability but deteriorate environmental quality in the presence of government effectiveness. Money supply and government expenditure both individually and in interaction with government effectiveness discourage environmental quality in E-7 economies. the individual role of government effectiveness shows that the government of E-7 economies are inefficient in curtailing carbon emission to ensure sustainable environment. Technological progress and urbanization contribute to ensure environment quality while increased energy access, and per capita gross domestic product degrade environmental sustainability. Moreover, bidirectional causality runs money supply and government expenditure to carbon emissions, while unidirectional causality is found between government effectiveness and CO2 emissions. However, no causality is found between real interest rate and carbon emissions. Policymakers are needed to integrate environmental regulations into economic policies to ensure government effectiveness improve, rather than undermines, their carbon-reducing potential. Moreover, tax revenue and interest rates need targeted framework to maintain their benefits even as government effectiveness of the E-7 economies improves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信