{"title":"ANN与MARS模型:在板翅式换热器中增强二氧化钛/水二元纳米流体和二氧化钛/水单纳米流体的实验性能","authors":"Emre Askin Elibol , Yunus Emre Gonulacar , Fatih Aktas , Burak Tigli","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.110022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study has experimentally examined the cooling performance/heat transfer rate, effectiveness, and UA product of a PFHE (plate-fin heat exchanger) used on a motorcycle, employing MgO-TiO<sub>2</sub>/water binary and TiO<sub>2</sub>/water mono nanofluids, in addition to pure water, at various concentrations (0 %, 0.00645 %, 0.0125 %, 0.025 % and 0.05 %), inlet temperatures (70 °C and 80 °C), and flow rates (6.5 LPM, 9.5 LPM and 12.5 LPM). The maximum heat transfer rate, effectiveness, and UA product values observed were 673.868 W, 0.856, and 27.768, respectively, with a 0.025 % concentration of MgO-TiO<sub>2</sub>/water binary nanofluid at an inlet temperature of 80 °C and a flow rate of 6.5 LPM. The heat transfer rate, effectiveness, and UA product values for pure water (0 %) under the same conditions were 591.152 W, 0.809, and 23.534, respectively. By applying the acquired data, both ANN and MARS were employed to predict effectiveness, and a comparison was established between the two methods. According to the best result for ANN (T<sub>in</sub> = 80 °C and MgO-TiO<sub>2</sub>/water), the MARS result indicates an MSE of 1.17 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, RMSE of 0.0034, SSE of 0.0002, MAPE of 0.3411, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9921. By comparison, the ANN results indicate an MSE of 2.52 × 10<sup>−6</sup>, RMSE of 0.0016, SSE of 3.78 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, MAPE of 0.0876, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9983. According to the best result for MARS (T<sub>in</sub> = 80 °C and TiO<sub>2</sub>/water), the ANN result shows an MSE of 6.03 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, RMSE of 0.0025, SSE of 9.05 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, MAPE of 0.1359, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9961. On the other hand, the MARS results exhibit a MSE of 3.97 × 10<sup>−6</sup>, RMSE of 0.0020, SSE of 5.96 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, MAPE of 0.2003, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9974.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":335,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 110022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANN vs. MARS modeling: Experimental performance enhancement of MgO-TiO2/water binary and TiO2/water mono nanofluids in a plate-fin heat exchanger\",\"authors\":\"Emre Askin Elibol , Yunus Emre Gonulacar , Fatih Aktas , Burak Tigli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.110022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study has experimentally examined the cooling performance/heat transfer rate, effectiveness, and UA product of a PFHE (plate-fin heat exchanger) used on a motorcycle, employing MgO-TiO<sub>2</sub>/water binary and TiO<sub>2</sub>/water mono nanofluids, in addition to pure water, at various concentrations (0 %, 0.00645 %, 0.0125 %, 0.025 % and 0.05 %), inlet temperatures (70 °C and 80 °C), and flow rates (6.5 LPM, 9.5 LPM and 12.5 LPM). The maximum heat transfer rate, effectiveness, and UA product values observed were 673.868 W, 0.856, and 27.768, respectively, with a 0.025 % concentration of MgO-TiO<sub>2</sub>/water binary nanofluid at an inlet temperature of 80 °C and a flow rate of 6.5 LPM. The heat transfer rate, effectiveness, and UA product values for pure water (0 %) under the same conditions were 591.152 W, 0.809, and 23.534, respectively. By applying the acquired data, both ANN and MARS were employed to predict effectiveness, and a comparison was established between the two methods. According to the best result for ANN (T<sub>in</sub> = 80 °C and MgO-TiO<sub>2</sub>/water), the MARS result indicates an MSE of 1.17 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, RMSE of 0.0034, SSE of 0.0002, MAPE of 0.3411, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9921. By comparison, the ANN results indicate an MSE of 2.52 × 10<sup>−6</sup>, RMSE of 0.0016, SSE of 3.78 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, MAPE of 0.0876, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9983. According to the best result for MARS (T<sub>in</sub> = 80 °C and TiO<sub>2</sub>/water), the ANN result shows an MSE of 6.03 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, RMSE of 0.0025, SSE of 9.05 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, MAPE of 0.1359, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9961. On the other hand, the MARS results exhibit a MSE of 3.97 × 10<sup>−6</sup>, RMSE of 0.0020, SSE of 5.96 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, MAPE of 0.2003, and an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.9974.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142727X25002802\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142727X25002802","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
ANN vs. MARS modeling: Experimental performance enhancement of MgO-TiO2/water binary and TiO2/water mono nanofluids in a plate-fin heat exchanger
This study has experimentally examined the cooling performance/heat transfer rate, effectiveness, and UA product of a PFHE (plate-fin heat exchanger) used on a motorcycle, employing MgO-TiO2/water binary and TiO2/water mono nanofluids, in addition to pure water, at various concentrations (0 %, 0.00645 %, 0.0125 %, 0.025 % and 0.05 %), inlet temperatures (70 °C and 80 °C), and flow rates (6.5 LPM, 9.5 LPM and 12.5 LPM). The maximum heat transfer rate, effectiveness, and UA product values observed were 673.868 W, 0.856, and 27.768, respectively, with a 0.025 % concentration of MgO-TiO2/water binary nanofluid at an inlet temperature of 80 °C and a flow rate of 6.5 LPM. The heat transfer rate, effectiveness, and UA product values for pure water (0 %) under the same conditions were 591.152 W, 0.809, and 23.534, respectively. By applying the acquired data, both ANN and MARS were employed to predict effectiveness, and a comparison was established between the two methods. According to the best result for ANN (Tin = 80 °C and MgO-TiO2/water), the MARS result indicates an MSE of 1.17 × 10−5, RMSE of 0.0034, SSE of 0.0002, MAPE of 0.3411, and an R2 of 0.9921. By comparison, the ANN results indicate an MSE of 2.52 × 10−6, RMSE of 0.0016, SSE of 3.78 × 10−5, MAPE of 0.0876, and an R2 of 0.9983. According to the best result for MARS (Tin = 80 °C and TiO2/water), the ANN result shows an MSE of 6.03 × 10−5, RMSE of 0.0025, SSE of 9.05 × 10−5, MAPE of 0.1359, and an R2 of 0.9961. On the other hand, the MARS results exhibit a MSE of 3.97 × 10−6, RMSE of 0.0020, SSE of 5.96 × 10−5, MAPE of 0.2003, and an R2 of 0.9974.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow welcomes high-quality original contributions on experimental, computational, and physical aspects of convective heat transfer and fluid dynamics relevant to engineering or the environment, including multiphase and microscale flows.
Papers reporting the application of these disciplines to design and development, with emphasis on new technological fields, are also welcomed. Some of these new fields include microscale electronic and mechanical systems; medical and biological systems; and thermal and flow control in both the internal and external environment.