Josiane G Luiz , Évelim Leal de Freitas Dantas Gomes , Manoella Cavalcante de Andrade , Dirceu Costa
{"title":"哮喘儿童和青少年运动熟练度和体能分析:一项横断面研究","authors":"Josiane G Luiz , Évelim Leal de Freitas Dantas Gomes , Manoella Cavalcante de Andrade , Dirceu Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.gpeds.2025.100284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Exercise restrictions due to asthma are associated with a sedentary lifestyle and reduced physical activity. Based on the limited data available in the literature, improvements in motor proficiency among individuals with respiratory diseases may be related to increased physical activity and better performance in activities of daily living. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate motor proficiency and its association with aerobic capacity in children and adolescents with asthma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted. Motor proficiency was evaluated using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children – 2nd edition (MABC-2). Aerobic capacity was assessed using the Modified Shuttle Walk Test (MSWT). Asthma control was determined using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty participants not engaged in regular physical activity (25 with asthma and 25 controls) were evaluated. The mean age was 7.7 ± 2.65 years in the asthma group (AG) and 10.9 ± 3.89 years in the control group (CG). Both groups performed below predicted values in the MSWT (58.7 ± 21.3 % AG and 66.8 ± 29.2 % CG). The AG performed significantly worse than the CG on the aiming and catching subscale of the MABC-2 (15.4 ± 5.23 and 20.1 ± 7.06, <em>p</em> = 0.01, respectively). Moreover, a moderate negative correlation was found between manual dexterity and asthma control (<em>r</em> = -0.51, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Each 9.79-point increase in the MABC-2 manual dexterity subscale was associated with a 1.72-point reduction in the ACQ6.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Low aerobic capacity appears to negatively impact balance, and poor asthma control appears to negatively affect manual dexterity in the AG. Moreover, the AG had worse performance in aiming and catching compared to the CG.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73173,"journal":{"name":"Global pediatrics","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the motor proficiency and physical capacity of asthmatic children and adolescents: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Josiane G Luiz , Évelim Leal de Freitas Dantas Gomes , Manoella Cavalcante de Andrade , Dirceu Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gpeds.2025.100284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Exercise restrictions due to asthma are associated with a sedentary lifestyle and reduced physical activity. Based on the limited data available in the literature, improvements in motor proficiency among individuals with respiratory diseases may be related to increased physical activity and better performance in activities of daily living. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate motor proficiency and its association with aerobic capacity in children and adolescents with asthma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted. Motor proficiency was evaluated using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children – 2nd edition (MABC-2). Aerobic capacity was assessed using the Modified Shuttle Walk Test (MSWT). Asthma control was determined using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty participants not engaged in regular physical activity (25 with asthma and 25 controls) were evaluated. The mean age was 7.7 ± 2.65 years in the asthma group (AG) and 10.9 ± 3.89 years in the control group (CG). Both groups performed below predicted values in the MSWT (58.7 ± 21.3 % AG and 66.8 ± 29.2 % CG). The AG performed significantly worse than the CG on the aiming and catching subscale of the MABC-2 (15.4 ± 5.23 and 20.1 ± 7.06, <em>p</em> = 0.01, respectively). Moreover, a moderate negative correlation was found between manual dexterity and asthma control (<em>r</em> = -0.51, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Each 9.79-point increase in the MABC-2 manual dexterity subscale was associated with a 1.72-point reduction in the ACQ6.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Low aerobic capacity appears to negatively impact balance, and poor asthma control appears to negatively affect manual dexterity in the AG. Moreover, the AG had worse performance in aiming and catching compared to the CG.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667009725000429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667009725000429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:哮喘引起的运动限制与久坐不动的生活方式和体力活动减少有关。基于文献中有限的数据,呼吸系统疾病患者运动能力的提高可能与体力活动的增加和日常生活活动的改善有关。因此,本研究的目的是评估儿童和青少年哮喘患者的运动熟练程度及其与有氧能力的关系。方法采用横断面研究。运动能力评估使用儿童运动评估电池-第二版(MABC-2)。使用改良穿梭行走测试(MSWT)评估有氧能力。采用哮喘控制问卷(Asthma control Questionnaire, ACQ6)确定哮喘控制情况。结果对50名不从事常规体育活动的参与者(哮喘患者25名,对照组25名)进行了评估。哮喘组(AG)平均年龄7.7±2.65岁,对照组(CG)平均年龄10.9±3.89岁。两组的MSWT均低于预测值(58.7±21.3% AG和66.8±29.2% CG)。在MABC-2的瞄准和捕获分量表上,AG组的得分分别为15.4±5.23和20.1±7.06,p = 0.01,显著低于CG组。此外,手灵巧度与哮喘控制之间存在中度负相关(r = -0.51, p = 0.02)。MABC-2手灵巧子量表每增加9.79分,ACQ6就会减少1.72分。结论有氧能力缓慢会对平衡产生负面影响,哮喘控制不佳会对手灵巧性产生负面影响。此外,AG在瞄准和捕捉方面的表现也比CG差。
Analysis of the motor proficiency and physical capacity of asthmatic children and adolescents: A cross-sectional study
Background
Exercise restrictions due to asthma are associated with a sedentary lifestyle and reduced physical activity. Based on the limited data available in the literature, improvements in motor proficiency among individuals with respiratory diseases may be related to increased physical activity and better performance in activities of daily living. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate motor proficiency and its association with aerobic capacity in children and adolescents with asthma.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted. Motor proficiency was evaluated using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children – 2nd edition (MABC-2). Aerobic capacity was assessed using the Modified Shuttle Walk Test (MSWT). Asthma control was determined using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6).
Results
Fifty participants not engaged in regular physical activity (25 with asthma and 25 controls) were evaluated. The mean age was 7.7 ± 2.65 years in the asthma group (AG) and 10.9 ± 3.89 years in the control group (CG). Both groups performed below predicted values in the MSWT (58.7 ± 21.3 % AG and 66.8 ± 29.2 % CG). The AG performed significantly worse than the CG on the aiming and catching subscale of the MABC-2 (15.4 ± 5.23 and 20.1 ± 7.06, p = 0.01, respectively). Moreover, a moderate negative correlation was found between manual dexterity and asthma control (r = -0.51, p = 0.02). Each 9.79-point increase in the MABC-2 manual dexterity subscale was associated with a 1.72-point reduction in the ACQ6.
Conclusions
Low aerobic capacity appears to negatively impact balance, and poor asthma control appears to negatively affect manual dexterity in the AG. Moreover, the AG had worse performance in aiming and catching compared to the CG.