Suhas Nuggehalli Sampathkumar*, Thomas Benjamin Ferriday, Samaneh Daviran, Hamza Moussaoui, Philippe Aubin, Khaled Lawand, Mounir Mensi, Pascal Alexander Schouwink, Albert Taureg, Vanja Subotić, Arthur Paul Lucien Thévenot, Fabio Dionigi, Peter Strasser and Jan Van Herle,
{"title":"组合使用参考电极和DRT解结AEM电解槽损耗","authors":"Suhas Nuggehalli Sampathkumar*, Thomas Benjamin Ferriday, Samaneh Daviran, Hamza Moussaoui, Philippe Aubin, Khaled Lawand, Mounir Mensi, Pascal Alexander Schouwink, Albert Taureg, Vanja Subotić, Arthur Paul Lucien Thévenot, Fabio Dionigi, Peter Strasser and Jan Van Herle, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) offer a promising alternative to proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers, leveraging non-precious-metal catalysts and alkaline electrolytes for cost reduction. However, challenges persist in achieving long-term durability, high current densities, and stable membrane performance. While previous studies have examined AEM development, a comprehensive structural-electrochemical analysis of AEMWE components under prolonged operation remains limited. This study presents a detailed structural and electrochemical characterization of a commercial AEMWE, where its full-cell performance was matched with the intrinsic half-electrode performance through the use of dual reference electrodes. The electrochemical analysis was supported by a thorough tomographic and spectroscopic investigation of each electrode, thereby providing for the first time a complete materials analysis of the commercial NiFeO<sub>x</sub> anode and Raney nickel cathode. Electrochemical characterization using LSV, EIS, and a dual reference electrode setup revealed full-cell performance of 1.0 A cm<sup>–2</sup> at 2.2 V (ambient) and 1.1 A cm<sup>–2</sup> at 2.0 V (60 °C), with an HHV efficiency of 74.5% at 1.0 A cm<sup>–2</sup>. Long-term operation over 1000 h at 1.0 A cm<sup>–2</sup>, 60 °C, in 1.0 M KOH resulted in a substantial polarization resistance increase beyond 230 h, despite an unexpected continuous improvement in MEA performance due to membrane degradation. DRT analysis, coupled with reference electrode studies, was critical in isolating losses. Low-frequency peaks (1.5–25 Hz) were linked to bubble formation, while intermediate-frequency (50–2000 Hz) and high-frequency (>2000 Hz) processes corresponded to charge transfer and ionic transport. The NiFeO<sub>x</sub> anode exhibited better charge transfer, whereas the Raney nickel cathode showed higher polarization resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 34","pages":"16485–16500"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01799","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combinatorial Use of Reference Electrodes and DRT for Disentangling AEM Electrolyzer Losses\",\"authors\":\"Suhas Nuggehalli Sampathkumar*, Thomas Benjamin Ferriday, Samaneh Daviran, Hamza Moussaoui, Philippe Aubin, Khaled Lawand, Mounir Mensi, Pascal Alexander Schouwink, Albert Taureg, Vanja Subotić, Arthur Paul Lucien Thévenot, Fabio Dionigi, Peter Strasser and Jan Van Herle, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) offer a promising alternative to proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers, leveraging non-precious-metal catalysts and alkaline electrolytes for cost reduction. However, challenges persist in achieving long-term durability, high current densities, and stable membrane performance. While previous studies have examined AEM development, a comprehensive structural-electrochemical analysis of AEMWE components under prolonged operation remains limited. This study presents a detailed structural and electrochemical characterization of a commercial AEMWE, where its full-cell performance was matched with the intrinsic half-electrode performance through the use of dual reference electrodes. The electrochemical analysis was supported by a thorough tomographic and spectroscopic investigation of each electrode, thereby providing for the first time a complete materials analysis of the commercial NiFeO<sub>x</sub> anode and Raney nickel cathode. Electrochemical characterization using LSV, EIS, and a dual reference electrode setup revealed full-cell performance of 1.0 A cm<sup>–2</sup> at 2.2 V (ambient) and 1.1 A cm<sup>–2</sup> at 2.0 V (60 °C), with an HHV efficiency of 74.5% at 1.0 A cm<sup>–2</sup>. Long-term operation over 1000 h at 1.0 A cm<sup>–2</sup>, 60 °C, in 1.0 M KOH resulted in a substantial polarization resistance increase beyond 230 h, despite an unexpected continuous improvement in MEA performance due to membrane degradation. DRT analysis, coupled with reference electrode studies, was critical in isolating losses. Low-frequency peaks (1.5–25 Hz) were linked to bubble formation, while intermediate-frequency (50–2000 Hz) and high-frequency (>2000 Hz) processes corresponded to charge transfer and ionic transport. The NiFeO<sub>x</sub> anode exhibited better charge transfer, whereas the Raney nickel cathode showed higher polarization resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\"39 34\",\"pages\":\"16485–16500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01799\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01799\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01799","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
阴离子交换膜水电解槽(AEMWEs)是质子交换膜(PEM)电解槽的一个很有前途的替代品,利用非贵金属催化剂和碱性电解质来降低成本。然而,在实现长期耐用性、高电流密度和稳定的膜性能方面仍然存在挑战。虽然以前的研究已经考察了AEM的发展,但对AEMWE组件在长时间运行下的全面结构电化学分析仍然有限。本研究介绍了商用AEMWE的详细结构和电化学表征,其中通过使用双参考电极,其全电池性能与固有半电极性能相匹配。电化学分析通过对每个电极进行彻底的层析成像和光谱研究来支持,从而首次提供了对商用NiFeOx阳极和Raney镍阴极的完整材料分析。利用LSV、EIS和双参考电极装置进行电化学表征显示,在2.2 V(环境)和2.0 V(60°C)下的全电池性能分别为1.0 a cm-2和1.1 a cm-2,在1.0 a cm-2下的HHV效率为74.5%。在1.0 A cm-2、60°C、1.0 M KOH条件下长期运行1000小时以上,导致极化电阻在230小时后大幅增加,尽管由于膜降解,MEA性能得到了意想不到的持续改善。DRT分析,结合参考电极研究,是隔离损耗的关键。低频峰(1.5-25 Hz)与气泡形成有关,而中频(50-2000 Hz)和高频(>2000 Hz)过程对应于电荷转移和离子传输。NiFeOx阳极具有较好的电荷转移性能,而Raney镍阴极具有较高的极化电阻。
Combinatorial Use of Reference Electrodes and DRT for Disentangling AEM Electrolyzer Losses
Anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) offer a promising alternative to proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers, leveraging non-precious-metal catalysts and alkaline electrolytes for cost reduction. However, challenges persist in achieving long-term durability, high current densities, and stable membrane performance. While previous studies have examined AEM development, a comprehensive structural-electrochemical analysis of AEMWE components under prolonged operation remains limited. This study presents a detailed structural and electrochemical characterization of a commercial AEMWE, where its full-cell performance was matched with the intrinsic half-electrode performance through the use of dual reference electrodes. The electrochemical analysis was supported by a thorough tomographic and spectroscopic investigation of each electrode, thereby providing for the first time a complete materials analysis of the commercial NiFeOx anode and Raney nickel cathode. Electrochemical characterization using LSV, EIS, and a dual reference electrode setup revealed full-cell performance of 1.0 A cm–2 at 2.2 V (ambient) and 1.1 A cm–2 at 2.0 V (60 °C), with an HHV efficiency of 74.5% at 1.0 A cm–2. Long-term operation over 1000 h at 1.0 A cm–2, 60 °C, in 1.0 M KOH resulted in a substantial polarization resistance increase beyond 230 h, despite an unexpected continuous improvement in MEA performance due to membrane degradation. DRT analysis, coupled with reference electrode studies, was critical in isolating losses. Low-frequency peaks (1.5–25 Hz) were linked to bubble formation, while intermediate-frequency (50–2000 Hz) and high-frequency (>2000 Hz) processes corresponded to charge transfer and ionic transport. The NiFeOx anode exhibited better charge transfer, whereas the Raney nickel cathode showed higher polarization resistance.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.