人为补贴和野火影响三种鸟类捕食者的密度、占用率和物种相互作用

IF 2.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70359
Terrah M. Owens, Lindsey R. Perry, Jonathan B. Dinkins
{"title":"人为补贴和野火影响三种鸟类捕食者的密度、占用率和物种相互作用","authors":"Terrah M. Owens,&nbsp;Lindsey R. Perry,&nbsp;Jonathan B. Dinkins","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anthropogenic subsidies and disturbance can benefit generalist avian species by providing additional food, nesting, and perching resources. In the sagebrush biome, anthropogenic subsidies have led to increases in the number of common ravens (<i>Corvus corax</i>; hereafter ravens), red-tailed hawks (<i>Buteo jamaicensis</i>), and Swainson's hawks (<i>Buteo swainsoni</i>), but it is unclear how wildfire disturbance may be affecting these species. We used 6 years of count data (2017–2022) to investigate the effects of anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire on density, occupancy, interspecific density dependence, and interactions of these three sympatric predators in five study areas in eastern Oregon. Estimated mean relative densities for all species varied annually, ranging from 1.00 to 2.05 km<sup>−2</sup> for ravens, from 0.46 to 1.09 km<sup>−2</sup> for red-tailed hawks, and from 0.07 to 0.38 km<sup>−2</sup> for Swainson's hawks. Mean occupancy probability was 0.78 across all study areas for red-tailed hawks and varied by study area for ravens and Swainson's hawks, ranging from 0.62 to 0.94 and from 0.70 to 0.97, respectively. N-mixture and occupancy models indicated that anthropogenic subsidies and recent wildfires (≤10 years) were positively associated with the density and occupancy of ravens and red-tailed hawks. However, only road density was associated with the occupancy of Swainson's hawks. There were no interspecific density-dependent effects for ravens and red-tailed hawks, but Swainson's hawk density decreased as densities of ravens and red-tailed hawks increased. Multispecies occupancy models indicated that most occupancy probabilities associated with anthropogenic subsidies were independent of allospecific presence. However, occupancy probabilities were influenced by wildfire, indicating negative interactions between Swainson's hawks and ravens but positive interactions between Swainson's and red-tailed hawks. Our results provide evidence that anthropogenic subsidies create hotspots of generalist predators in sagebrush ecosystems fragmented by wildfire. These increased densities may lead to human–wildlife conflicts, displacement of specialist predator species, and greater risk of predation to prey species of conservation concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70359","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire influence density, occupancy, and species interactions of three avian predators\",\"authors\":\"Terrah M. Owens,&nbsp;Lindsey R. Perry,&nbsp;Jonathan B. Dinkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Anthropogenic subsidies and disturbance can benefit generalist avian species by providing additional food, nesting, and perching resources. In the sagebrush biome, anthropogenic subsidies have led to increases in the number of common ravens (<i>Corvus corax</i>; hereafter ravens), red-tailed hawks (<i>Buteo jamaicensis</i>), and Swainson's hawks (<i>Buteo swainsoni</i>), but it is unclear how wildfire disturbance may be affecting these species. We used 6 years of count data (2017–2022) to investigate the effects of anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire on density, occupancy, interspecific density dependence, and interactions of these three sympatric predators in five study areas in eastern Oregon. Estimated mean relative densities for all species varied annually, ranging from 1.00 to 2.05 km<sup>−2</sup> for ravens, from 0.46 to 1.09 km<sup>−2</sup> for red-tailed hawks, and from 0.07 to 0.38 km<sup>−2</sup> for Swainson's hawks. Mean occupancy probability was 0.78 across all study areas for red-tailed hawks and varied by study area for ravens and Swainson's hawks, ranging from 0.62 to 0.94 and from 0.70 to 0.97, respectively. N-mixture and occupancy models indicated that anthropogenic subsidies and recent wildfires (≤10 years) were positively associated with the density and occupancy of ravens and red-tailed hawks. However, only road density was associated with the occupancy of Swainson's hawks. There were no interspecific density-dependent effects for ravens and red-tailed hawks, but Swainson's hawk density decreased as densities of ravens and red-tailed hawks increased. Multispecies occupancy models indicated that most occupancy probabilities associated with anthropogenic subsidies were independent of allospecific presence. However, occupancy probabilities were influenced by wildfire, indicating negative interactions between Swainson's hawks and ravens but positive interactions between Swainson's and red-tailed hawks. Our results provide evidence that anthropogenic subsidies create hotspots of generalist predators in sagebrush ecosystems fragmented by wildfire. These increased densities may lead to human–wildlife conflicts, displacement of specialist predator species, and greater risk of predation to prey species of conservation concern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70359\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70359\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人为补贴和干扰可以通过提供额外的食物、筑巢和栖息资源而使一般鸟类受益。在山艾树生物群系中,人为补贴导致了普通渡鸦(Corvus corax;以下简称渡鸦)、红尾鹰(Buteo jamaicensis)和斯温森鹰(Buteo swainsoni)数量的增加,但目前尚不清楚野火干扰如何影响这些物种。利用2017-2022年6年的统计数据,研究了人为补贴和野火对俄勒冈州东部5个研究区三种同域食肉动物的密度、占用率、种间密度依赖和相互作用的影响。所有物种的平均相对密度每年都在变化,乌鸦的平均相对密度在1.00 - 2.05 km−2之间,红尾鹰的平均相对密度在0.46 - 1.09 km−2之间,斯温森鹰的平均相对密度在0.07 - 0.38 km−2之间。红尾鹰在所有研究区域的平均占用概率为0.78,渡鸦和斯温森鹰在不同研究区域的平均占用概率分别为0.62 ~ 0.94和0.70 ~ 0.97。n -mix模型和占用率模型表明,人为补贴和最近的野火(≤10年)与渡鸦和红尾鹰的密度和占用率呈正相关。然而,只有道路密度与斯温森鹰的占有有关。渡鸦和红尾鹰不存在种间密度依赖效应,但随着渡鸦和红尾鹰密度的增加,斯温森鹰密度呈下降趋势。多物种占用模型表明,与人为补贴相关的大多数占用概率与同种异种存在无关。然而,占据概率受到野火的影响,表明斯温森鹰与乌鸦之间存在负交互作用,而斯温森鹰与红尾鹰之间存在正交互作用。研究结果表明,人为补贴在野火破碎化的山艾草生态系统中形成了多能捕食者的热点。这些增加的密度可能会导致人类与野生动物的冲突,导致专业捕食者物种的流离失所,以及更大的被捕食风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire influence density, occupancy, and species interactions of three avian predators

Anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire influence density, occupancy, and species interactions of three avian predators

Anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire influence density, occupancy, and species interactions of three avian predators

Anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire influence density, occupancy, and species interactions of three avian predators

Anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire influence density, occupancy, and species interactions of three avian predators

Anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire influence density, occupancy, and species interactions of three avian predators

Anthropogenic subsidies and disturbance can benefit generalist avian species by providing additional food, nesting, and perching resources. In the sagebrush biome, anthropogenic subsidies have led to increases in the number of common ravens (Corvus corax; hereafter ravens), red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis), and Swainson's hawks (Buteo swainsoni), but it is unclear how wildfire disturbance may be affecting these species. We used 6 years of count data (2017–2022) to investigate the effects of anthropogenic subsidies and wildfire on density, occupancy, interspecific density dependence, and interactions of these three sympatric predators in five study areas in eastern Oregon. Estimated mean relative densities for all species varied annually, ranging from 1.00 to 2.05 km−2 for ravens, from 0.46 to 1.09 km−2 for red-tailed hawks, and from 0.07 to 0.38 km−2 for Swainson's hawks. Mean occupancy probability was 0.78 across all study areas for red-tailed hawks and varied by study area for ravens and Swainson's hawks, ranging from 0.62 to 0.94 and from 0.70 to 0.97, respectively. N-mixture and occupancy models indicated that anthropogenic subsidies and recent wildfires (≤10 years) were positively associated with the density and occupancy of ravens and red-tailed hawks. However, only road density was associated with the occupancy of Swainson's hawks. There were no interspecific density-dependent effects for ravens and red-tailed hawks, but Swainson's hawk density decreased as densities of ravens and red-tailed hawks increased. Multispecies occupancy models indicated that most occupancy probabilities associated with anthropogenic subsidies were independent of allospecific presence. However, occupancy probabilities were influenced by wildfire, indicating negative interactions between Swainson's hawks and ravens but positive interactions between Swainson's and red-tailed hawks. Our results provide evidence that anthropogenic subsidies create hotspots of generalist predators in sagebrush ecosystems fragmented by wildfire. These increased densities may lead to human–wildlife conflicts, displacement of specialist predator species, and greater risk of predation to prey species of conservation concern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信