部分屈肌网膜释放保留腕横韧带和肱前筋膜与完全屈肌网膜释放治疗中重度腕管综合征的比较

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tahreem Fatima, Umar Nadeem, Aleeha Batool, Noor Atiq
{"title":"部分屈肌网膜释放保留腕横韧带和肱前筋膜与完全屈肌网膜释放治疗中重度腕管综合征的比较","authors":"Tahreem Fatima,&nbsp;Umar Nadeem,&nbsp;Aleeha Batool,&nbsp;Noor Atiq","doi":"10.1155/ane/8896998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background and Aims:</b> Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent peripheral mononeuropathy affecting the median nerve. It can be managed with physiotherapy, localised steroid injections, or surgery. Our study compared outcomes of two surgical techniques, that is, partial flexor retinaculum release (FRR) and conventional complete FRR in moderate to severe CTS.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> It was a single-blinded cohort study conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, over a 12-month period in 2022. Sampling was stratified random with a total sample size of 66. Inclusion criteria were patients between 18 and 70 years of age, having Grade 3 to 6 CTS (Bland electrophysiological classification), having undergone at least one localised steroid injection on the symptomatic side, with no other spinal cord deformities. The rest were excluded. Interventions studied were complete FRR and partial FRR, sparing transverse carpal ligament and antebrachial fascia. Data was analysed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) Version 26. Analytic tests used were chi-square test, linear-to-linear test, independent sample <i>t</i>-test and Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test with a <i>p</i> value of &lt;0.05.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Partial FRR was done in 34 patients (51.51%) and complete FRR in 32 patients (48.48%). There was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes when compared independently. Linear regression analysis showed a significant role of partial FRR in predicting postoperative Boston questionnaire for symptom severity scale (BQSSS) scores (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and Boston questionnaire for functional severity scale (BQFSS) scores (<i>p</i> = 0.045) when other independent variables are accounted. No such relationship was demonstrated with postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (<i>p</i> = 0.531).</p><p><b>Interpretation:</b> Partial FRR is a novel technique for the management of CTS, resistant to local steroid administration. This technique showed no significant difference in postoperative outcomes from its traditional counterpart, with a possibility of improved postoperative structural and functional recovery that needs further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ane/8896998","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Partial Flexor Retinaculum Release Sparing Transverse Carpal Ligament and Antebrachial Fascia With Complete Flexor Retinaculum Release in the Management of Moderate to Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Tahreem Fatima,&nbsp;Umar Nadeem,&nbsp;Aleeha Batool,&nbsp;Noor Atiq\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ane/8896998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background and Aims:</b> Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent peripheral mononeuropathy affecting the median nerve. It can be managed with physiotherapy, localised steroid injections, or surgery. Our study compared outcomes of two surgical techniques, that is, partial flexor retinaculum release (FRR) and conventional complete FRR in moderate to severe CTS.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> It was a single-blinded cohort study conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, over a 12-month period in 2022. Sampling was stratified random with a total sample size of 66. Inclusion criteria were patients between 18 and 70 years of age, having Grade 3 to 6 CTS (Bland electrophysiological classification), having undergone at least one localised steroid injection on the symptomatic side, with no other spinal cord deformities. The rest were excluded. Interventions studied were complete FRR and partial FRR, sparing transverse carpal ligament and antebrachial fascia. Data was analysed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) Version 26. Analytic tests used were chi-square test, linear-to-linear test, independent sample <i>t</i>-test and Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test with a <i>p</i> value of &lt;0.05.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Partial FRR was done in 34 patients (51.51%) and complete FRR in 32 patients (48.48%). There was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes when compared independently. Linear regression analysis showed a significant role of partial FRR in predicting postoperative Boston questionnaire for symptom severity scale (BQSSS) scores (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and Boston questionnaire for functional severity scale (BQFSS) scores (<i>p</i> = 0.045) when other independent variables are accounted. No such relationship was demonstrated with postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (<i>p</i> = 0.531).</p><p><b>Interpretation:</b> Partial FRR is a novel technique for the management of CTS, resistant to local steroid administration. This technique showed no significant difference in postoperative outcomes from its traditional counterpart, with a possibility of improved postoperative structural and functional recovery that needs further evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ane/8896998\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ane/8896998\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ane/8896998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:腕管综合征(Carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS)是最常见的影响正中神经的外周单神经病变。它可以通过物理治疗、局部类固醇注射或手术来治疗。我们的研究比较了两种手术技术的结果,即部分屈肌视网膜带释放(FRR)和传统的完全FRR治疗中重度CTS。方法:这是一项单盲队列研究,于2022年在巴基斯坦拉合尔的梅奥医院进行,为期12个月。抽样方法为分层随机抽样,总样本量为66例。纳入标准为年龄在18 - 70岁之间,3 - 6级CTS (Bland电生理分级),在症状侧至少接受过一次局部类固醇注射,无其他脊髓畸形的患者。其余的被排除在外。研究的干预措施包括完全和部分FRR,保留腕横韧带和肱前筋膜。数据分析使用统计软件包的社会科学(SPSS)版本26。分析检验采用卡方检验、线性对线性检验、独立样本t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验,p值为0.05。结果:部分FRR 34例(51.51%),完全FRR 32例(48.48%)。独立比较时,术后结果无显著差异。线性回归分析显示,当考虑其他自变量时,部分FRR在预测术后波士顿症状严重程度量表(BQSSS)评分(p = 0.021)和波士顿功能严重程度量表(BQFSS)评分(p = 0.045)方面具有显著作用。与术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)无相关性(p = 0.531)。解释:部分FRR是一种治疗CTS的新技术,对局部类固醇治疗具有抗性。该技术与传统技术相比,术后结果无显著差异,其术后结构和功能恢复的可能性有待进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Partial Flexor Retinaculum Release Sparing Transverse Carpal Ligament and Antebrachial Fascia With Complete Flexor Retinaculum Release in the Management of Moderate to Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Comparison of Partial Flexor Retinaculum Release Sparing Transverse Carpal Ligament and Antebrachial Fascia With Complete Flexor Retinaculum Release in the Management of Moderate to Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Background and Aims: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent peripheral mononeuropathy affecting the median nerve. It can be managed with physiotherapy, localised steroid injections, or surgery. Our study compared outcomes of two surgical techniques, that is, partial flexor retinaculum release (FRR) and conventional complete FRR in moderate to severe CTS.

Methods: It was a single-blinded cohort study conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, over a 12-month period in 2022. Sampling was stratified random with a total sample size of 66. Inclusion criteria were patients between 18 and 70 years of age, having Grade 3 to 6 CTS (Bland electrophysiological classification), having undergone at least one localised steroid injection on the symptomatic side, with no other spinal cord deformities. The rest were excluded. Interventions studied were complete FRR and partial FRR, sparing transverse carpal ligament and antebrachial fascia. Data was analysed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) Version 26. Analytic tests used were chi-square test, linear-to-linear test, independent sample t-test and Mann–Whitney U test with a p value of <0.05.

Results: Partial FRR was done in 34 patients (51.51%) and complete FRR in 32 patients (48.48%). There was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes when compared independently. Linear regression analysis showed a significant role of partial FRR in predicting postoperative Boston questionnaire for symptom severity scale (BQSSS) scores (p = 0.021) and Boston questionnaire for functional severity scale (BQFSS) scores (p = 0.045) when other independent variables are accounted. No such relationship was demonstrated with postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (p = 0.531).

Interpretation: Partial FRR is a novel technique for the management of CTS, resistant to local steroid administration. This technique showed no significant difference in postoperative outcomes from its traditional counterpart, with a possibility of improved postoperative structural and functional recovery that needs further evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信