Rafael Malmagro, Vicente García-Navas, Tharaka S. Priyadarshana, Felix Neff, Pelayo Barrios, Carlos Martínez-Núñez
{"title":"生产力梯度比气候稳定性更能解释全球鸟类的专门化","authors":"Rafael Malmagro, Vicente García-Navas, Tharaka S. Priyadarshana, Felix Neff, Pelayo Barrios, Carlos Martínez-Núñez","doi":"10.1111/geb.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Historical and contemporary environmental factors are hypothesised to influence the degree of ecological specialisation of species. Long-term climate stability might facilitate specialisation by promoting stable environments and diversification (climate stability hypothesis). In contrast, current stress–productivity gradients could also moderate specialisation through: (i) environmental filtering in stressful (e.g., arid) environments or (ii) accumulation of specialised species in highly productive regions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Pliocene-present.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Birds.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We tested whether different specialisation facets (climate, diet and habitat) in bird assemblages are better explained by long-term climate stability or current stress-productivity gradients while accounting for latitude, longitude, biogeographic realm, taxonomic species richness and the evolutionary age of the assemblages at a global scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Long-term climatic stability was a weak predictor of bird specialisation after accounting for latitude. In contrast, aridity showed a consistent negative association with climate, diet, and habitat specialisation, even after controlling for latitude and species richness. Species richness was strongly positively associated with diet specialisation, suggesting the influence of niche filling processes. In addition, specialisation was more pronounced in high-productivity environments, indicating that greater niche availability fosters specialisation. Notably, the effects of aridity and assemblage mean evolutionary age on specialisation differed between hemispheres. While negative associations dominated in Southern realms, the Palearctic and Nearctic realms in the Northern Hemisphere showed more positive trends. This hemispheric contrast underscores the context-dependency of environmental effects on specialisation and points to biogeographic history as a potential modulator of these patterns.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Globally, stress-productivity gradients better explain patterns of avian specialisation than long-term climate stability. Overall, our results did not support the climate stability hypothesis and challenged the idea that abiotically stressful conditions promote specialisation. The present study suggests that ecological processes, especially niche filling in productive regions with accumulated species, play a key role in driving and maintaining specialisation in birds.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Productivity Gradient Explains Global Bird Specialisation Better Than Climate Stability\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Malmagro, Vicente García-Navas, Tharaka S. Priyadarshana, Felix Neff, Pelayo Barrios, Carlos Martínez-Núñez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Historical and contemporary environmental factors are hypothesised to influence the degree of ecological specialisation of species. Long-term climate stability might facilitate specialisation by promoting stable environments and diversification (climate stability hypothesis). In contrast, current stress–productivity gradients could also moderate specialisation through: (i) environmental filtering in stressful (e.g., arid) environments or (ii) accumulation of specialised species in highly productive regions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Global.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pliocene-present.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Birds.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We tested whether different specialisation facets (climate, diet and habitat) in bird assemblages are better explained by long-term climate stability or current stress-productivity gradients while accounting for latitude, longitude, biogeographic realm, taxonomic species richness and the evolutionary age of the assemblages at a global scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Long-term climatic stability was a weak predictor of bird specialisation after accounting for latitude. In contrast, aridity showed a consistent negative association with climate, diet, and habitat specialisation, even after controlling for latitude and species richness. Species richness was strongly positively associated with diet specialisation, suggesting the influence of niche filling processes. In addition, specialisation was more pronounced in high-productivity environments, indicating that greater niche availability fosters specialisation. Notably, the effects of aridity and assemblage mean evolutionary age on specialisation differed between hemispheres. While negative associations dominated in Southern realms, the Palearctic and Nearctic realms in the Northern Hemisphere showed more positive trends. This hemispheric contrast underscores the context-dependency of environmental effects on specialisation and points to biogeographic history as a potential modulator of these patterns.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Globally, stress-productivity gradients better explain patterns of avian specialisation than long-term climate stability. Overall, our results did not support the climate stability hypothesis and challenged the idea that abiotically stressful conditions promote specialisation. The present study suggests that ecological processes, especially niche filling in productive regions with accumulated species, play a key role in driving and maintaining specialisation in birds.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70107\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70107\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70107","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Productivity Gradient Explains Global Bird Specialisation Better Than Climate Stability
Aim
Historical and contemporary environmental factors are hypothesised to influence the degree of ecological specialisation of species. Long-term climate stability might facilitate specialisation by promoting stable environments and diversification (climate stability hypothesis). In contrast, current stress–productivity gradients could also moderate specialisation through: (i) environmental filtering in stressful (e.g., arid) environments or (ii) accumulation of specialised species in highly productive regions.
Location
Global.
Time Period
Pliocene-present.
Major Taxa Studied
Birds.
Methods
We tested whether different specialisation facets (climate, diet and habitat) in bird assemblages are better explained by long-term climate stability or current stress-productivity gradients while accounting for latitude, longitude, biogeographic realm, taxonomic species richness and the evolutionary age of the assemblages at a global scale.
Results
Long-term climatic stability was a weak predictor of bird specialisation after accounting for latitude. In contrast, aridity showed a consistent negative association with climate, diet, and habitat specialisation, even after controlling for latitude and species richness. Species richness was strongly positively associated with diet specialisation, suggesting the influence of niche filling processes. In addition, specialisation was more pronounced in high-productivity environments, indicating that greater niche availability fosters specialisation. Notably, the effects of aridity and assemblage mean evolutionary age on specialisation differed between hemispheres. While negative associations dominated in Southern realms, the Palearctic and Nearctic realms in the Northern Hemisphere showed more positive trends. This hemispheric contrast underscores the context-dependency of environmental effects on specialisation and points to biogeographic history as a potential modulator of these patterns.
Conclusions
Globally, stress-productivity gradients better explain patterns of avian specialisation than long-term climate stability. Overall, our results did not support the climate stability hypothesis and challenged the idea that abiotically stressful conditions promote specialisation. The present study suggests that ecological processes, especially niche filling in productive regions with accumulated species, play a key role in driving and maintaining specialisation in birds.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.