生产力梯度比气候稳定性更能解释全球鸟类的专门化

IF 6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Rafael Malmagro, Vicente García-Navas, Tharaka S. Priyadarshana, Felix Neff, Pelayo Barrios, Carlos Martínez-Núñez
{"title":"生产力梯度比气候稳定性更能解释全球鸟类的专门化","authors":"Rafael Malmagro,&nbsp;Vicente García-Navas,&nbsp;Tharaka S. Priyadarshana,&nbsp;Felix Neff,&nbsp;Pelayo Barrios,&nbsp;Carlos Martínez-Núñez","doi":"10.1111/geb.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Historical and contemporary environmental factors are hypothesised to influence the degree of ecological specialisation of species. Long-term climate stability might facilitate specialisation by promoting stable environments and diversification (climate stability hypothesis). In contrast, current stress–productivity gradients could also moderate specialisation through: (i) environmental filtering in stressful (e.g., arid) environments or (ii) accumulation of specialised species in highly productive regions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Pliocene-present.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Birds.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We tested whether different specialisation facets (climate, diet and habitat) in bird assemblages are better explained by long-term climate stability or current stress-productivity gradients while accounting for latitude, longitude, biogeographic realm, taxonomic species richness and the evolutionary age of the assemblages at a global scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Long-term climatic stability was a weak predictor of bird specialisation after accounting for latitude. In contrast, aridity showed a consistent negative association with climate, diet, and habitat specialisation, even after controlling for latitude and species richness. Species richness was strongly positively associated with diet specialisation, suggesting the influence of niche filling processes. In addition, specialisation was more pronounced in high-productivity environments, indicating that greater niche availability fosters specialisation. Notably, the effects of aridity and assemblage mean evolutionary age on specialisation differed between hemispheres. While negative associations dominated in Southern realms, the Palearctic and Nearctic realms in the Northern Hemisphere showed more positive trends. This hemispheric contrast underscores the context-dependency of environmental effects on specialisation and points to biogeographic history as a potential modulator of these patterns.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Globally, stress-productivity gradients better explain patterns of avian specialisation than long-term climate stability. Overall, our results did not support the climate stability hypothesis and challenged the idea that abiotically stressful conditions promote specialisation. The present study suggests that ecological processes, especially niche filling in productive regions with accumulated species, play a key role in driving and maintaining specialisation in birds.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Productivity Gradient Explains Global Bird Specialisation Better Than Climate Stability\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Malmagro,&nbsp;Vicente García-Navas,&nbsp;Tharaka S. Priyadarshana,&nbsp;Felix Neff,&nbsp;Pelayo Barrios,&nbsp;Carlos Martínez-Núñez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Historical and contemporary environmental factors are hypothesised to influence the degree of ecological specialisation of species. Long-term climate stability might facilitate specialisation by promoting stable environments and diversification (climate stability hypothesis). In contrast, current stress–productivity gradients could also moderate specialisation through: (i) environmental filtering in stressful (e.g., arid) environments or (ii) accumulation of specialised species in highly productive regions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Global.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pliocene-present.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Birds.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We tested whether different specialisation facets (climate, diet and habitat) in bird assemblages are better explained by long-term climate stability or current stress-productivity gradients while accounting for latitude, longitude, biogeographic realm, taxonomic species richness and the evolutionary age of the assemblages at a global scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Long-term climatic stability was a weak predictor of bird specialisation after accounting for latitude. In contrast, aridity showed a consistent negative association with climate, diet, and habitat specialisation, even after controlling for latitude and species richness. Species richness was strongly positively associated with diet specialisation, suggesting the influence of niche filling processes. In addition, specialisation was more pronounced in high-productivity environments, indicating that greater niche availability fosters specialisation. Notably, the effects of aridity and assemblage mean evolutionary age on specialisation differed between hemispheres. While negative associations dominated in Southern realms, the Palearctic and Nearctic realms in the Northern Hemisphere showed more positive trends. This hemispheric contrast underscores the context-dependency of environmental effects on specialisation and points to biogeographic history as a potential modulator of these patterns.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Globally, stress-productivity gradients better explain patterns of avian specialisation than long-term climate stability. Overall, our results did not support the climate stability hypothesis and challenged the idea that abiotically stressful conditions promote specialisation. The present study suggests that ecological processes, especially niche filling in productive regions with accumulated species, play a key role in driving and maintaining specialisation in birds.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70107\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70107\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70107","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的假设历史和当代环境因素影响物种的生态专门化程度。长期气候稳定可能通过促进稳定的环境和多样化来促进专业化(气候稳定假说)。相比之下,当前的压力-生产力梯度也可以通过以下方式缓和专业化:(i)在压力(如干旱)环境中进行环境过滤,或(ii)在高产地区积累特化物种。位置 全球。时代:上新世至今。研究鸟类的主要分类群。在考虑纬度、经度、生物地理领域、分类物种丰富度和全球范围内鸟类组合的进化年龄的同时,我们测试了鸟类组合的不同专业化方面(气候、饮食和栖息地)是否可以用长期气候稳定性或当前的压力生产力梯度来更好地解释。结果考虑纬度因素后,长期气候稳定性对鸟类专业化的预测作用较弱。相比之下,即使在控制了纬度和物种丰富度之后,干旱也与气候、饮食和栖息地专业化表现出一致的负相关。物种丰富度与饮食特化呈显著正相关,表明生态位填充过程的影响。此外,专业化在高生产率环境中更为明显,这表明更大的生态位可用性促进了专业化。值得注意的是,干旱和组合的影响意味着进化年龄在两个半球之间的特化是不同的。虽然南半球的负面关联占主导地位,但北半球的古北极和新北极领域表现出更积极的趋势。这种半球对比强调了环境对专业化影响的背景依赖性,并指出生物地理历史是这些模式的潜在调节剂。在全球范围内,压力-生产力梯度比长期气候稳定性更能解释鸟类专业化的模式。总的来说,我们的结果不支持气候稳定假说,并挑战了非生物应激条件促进专业化的观点。目前的研究表明,生态过程,特别是在物种聚集的生产区的生态位填充,在推动和维持鸟类的专业化中起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Productivity Gradient Explains Global Bird Specialisation Better Than Climate Stability

The Productivity Gradient Explains Global Bird Specialisation Better Than Climate Stability

Aim

Historical and contemporary environmental factors are hypothesised to influence the degree of ecological specialisation of species. Long-term climate stability might facilitate specialisation by promoting stable environments and diversification (climate stability hypothesis). In contrast, current stress–productivity gradients could also moderate specialisation through: (i) environmental filtering in stressful (e.g., arid) environments or (ii) accumulation of specialised species in highly productive regions.

Location

Global.

Time Period

Pliocene-present.

Major Taxa Studied

Birds.

Methods

We tested whether different specialisation facets (climate, diet and habitat) in bird assemblages are better explained by long-term climate stability or current stress-productivity gradients while accounting for latitude, longitude, biogeographic realm, taxonomic species richness and the evolutionary age of the assemblages at a global scale.

Results

Long-term climatic stability was a weak predictor of bird specialisation after accounting for latitude. In contrast, aridity showed a consistent negative association with climate, diet, and habitat specialisation, even after controlling for latitude and species richness. Species richness was strongly positively associated with diet specialisation, suggesting the influence of niche filling processes. In addition, specialisation was more pronounced in high-productivity environments, indicating that greater niche availability fosters specialisation. Notably, the effects of aridity and assemblage mean evolutionary age on specialisation differed between hemispheres. While negative associations dominated in Southern realms, the Palearctic and Nearctic realms in the Northern Hemisphere showed more positive trends. This hemispheric contrast underscores the context-dependency of environmental effects on specialisation and points to biogeographic history as a potential modulator of these patterns.

Conclusions

Globally, stress-productivity gradients better explain patterns of avian specialisation than long-term climate stability. Overall, our results did not support the climate stability hypothesis and challenged the idea that abiotically stressful conditions promote specialisation. The present study suggests that ecological processes, especially niche filling in productive regions with accumulated species, play a key role in driving and maintaining specialisation in birds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信