Brailyn Weber, Abel Woldu, Nawang Singhe, Maritza V. Steele, Milki Gemeda, Sara Hylwa, Christopher L. Deufel
{"title":"学术皮肤科医生研究生产力回顾,包括职业年龄调整和机构比较","authors":"Brailyn Weber, Abel Woldu, Nawang Singhe, Maritza V. Steele, Milki Gemeda, Sara Hylwa, Christopher L. Deufel","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04356-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The research productivity of academic dermatology faculty and institutions is frequently assessed by quantitative bibliometrics, for which there are few established benchmarks. The objective of this study was to quantify bibliometrics for dermatology faculty from high-performing academic institutions, measure productivity changes throughout a career, and analyze productivity changes over time. The authors obtained peer-reviewed articles from 1973 to 2023 using Scopus for 410 faculty dermatologists from the 10 highest-ranked United States institutions as determined by Doximity in 2023. This data was used to generate cumulative distribution functions for various bibliometric performance metrics as a function of both career age and among academic institutions. These metrics included authorships (<span>\\(\\:\\dot{A}\\)</span>), first or last authorships (<span>\\(\\:\\dot{FL}\\)</span>), monograph equivalents (<span>\\(\\:\\dot{ME}\\)</span>), h-index, and ha-index. The authors additionally explored bibliometric inflation from the period of 1991 to 2023. Publication rates increased substantially over the course of a dermatologist’s career and peaked after 15–25 years for <span>\\(\\:\\dot{FL}\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\:\\dot{ME}\\)</span>. Median bibliometrics at career ages (1, 10, 20, 30) were <span>\\(\\:\\dot{A}\\)</span>=(1.0, 1.7, 3.4, 3.4) year<sup>− 1</sup>, <span>\\(\\:\\dot{FL}\\)</span>=(0.4, 0.6, 1.1, 0.6) year<sup>− 1</sup>, <span>\\(\\:\\dot{ME}\\)</span>=(0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.4) year<sup>− 1</sup>, h-index=(0, 6, 16, 26), and ha-index=(0.5, 3.4, 7.9, 12.6). Between 1991 and 2023, the median number of authors per paper doubled and <span>\\(\\:\\dot{A}\\)</span> increased by 36%, while <span>\\(\\:\\dot{FL}\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\:\\dot{ME}\\)</span> were stable. Inter-institutional performance was comparable, including distributions of lower and higher-performing faculty. In conclusion, intercomparison of academic dermatologist bibliometric performance requires adjustments for career age and era. In the presented work, the authors provide tabulated data for percentile ranking of faculty. Research productivity, measured by <span>\\(\\:\\dot{FL}\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\:\\dot{ME}\\)</span>, has not changed in over 30 years. Lastly, highly ranked institutions have similar distributions of lower and higher performers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Academic Dermatologist Research Productivity Including Career Age Adjustments and Institutional Comparisons\",\"authors\":\"Brailyn Weber, Abel Woldu, Nawang Singhe, Maritza V. Steele, Milki Gemeda, Sara Hylwa, Christopher L. Deufel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00403-025-04356-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The research productivity of academic dermatology faculty and institutions is frequently assessed by quantitative bibliometrics, for which there are few established benchmarks. The objective of this study was to quantify bibliometrics for dermatology faculty from high-performing academic institutions, measure productivity changes throughout a career, and analyze productivity changes over time. The authors obtained peer-reviewed articles from 1973 to 2023 using Scopus for 410 faculty dermatologists from the 10 highest-ranked United States institutions as determined by Doximity in 2023. This data was used to generate cumulative distribution functions for various bibliometric performance metrics as a function of both career age and among academic institutions. These metrics included authorships (<span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{A}\\\\)</span>), first or last authorships (<span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{FL}\\\\)</span>), monograph equivalents (<span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{ME}\\\\)</span>), h-index, and ha-index. The authors additionally explored bibliometric inflation from the period of 1991 to 2023. Publication rates increased substantially over the course of a dermatologist’s career and peaked after 15–25 years for <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{FL}\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{ME}\\\\)</span>. Median bibliometrics at career ages (1, 10, 20, 30) were <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{A}\\\\)</span>=(1.0, 1.7, 3.4, 3.4) year<sup>− 1</sup>, <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{FL}\\\\)</span>=(0.4, 0.6, 1.1, 0.6) year<sup>− 1</sup>, <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{ME}\\\\)</span>=(0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.4) year<sup>− 1</sup>, h-index=(0, 6, 16, 26), and ha-index=(0.5, 3.4, 7.9, 12.6). Between 1991 and 2023, the median number of authors per paper doubled and <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{A}\\\\)</span> increased by 36%, while <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{FL}\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{ME}\\\\)</span> were stable. Inter-institutional performance was comparable, including distributions of lower and higher-performing faculty. In conclusion, intercomparison of academic dermatologist bibliometric performance requires adjustments for career age and era. In the presented work, the authors provide tabulated data for percentile ranking of faculty. Research productivity, measured by <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{FL}\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(\\\\:\\\\dot{ME}\\\\)</span>, has not changed in over 30 years. Lastly, highly ranked institutions have similar distributions of lower and higher performers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04356-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04356-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
学术皮肤科教师和机构的研究生产力经常通过定量文献计量学进行评估,很少有既定的基准。本研究的目的是量化来自高绩效学术机构的皮肤科教师的文献计量学,测量整个职业生涯的生产力变化,并分析生产力随时间的变化。作者使用Scopus获得了1973年至2023年同行评议的文章,这些文章来自美国排名最高的10家机构的410名皮肤科医生,这些机构是由Doximity于2023年确定的。该数据用于生成各种文献计量学绩效指标的累积分布函数,作为职业年龄和学术机构之间的函数。这些指标包括作者身份(\(\:\dot{A}\))、第一或最后作者身份(\(\:\dot{FL}\))、专著当量(\(\:\dot{ME}\))、h-index和ha-index。作者还探讨了1991年至2023年期间的文献计量膨胀。在皮肤科医生的职业生涯中,发表率大幅增加,在\(\:\dot{FL}\)和\(\:\dot{ME}\)的15-25年后达到顶峰。职业年龄(1、10、20、30)的文献计量中位数为\(\:\dot{A}\) =(1.0, 1.7, 3.4, 3.4)年- 1,\(\:\dot{FL}\) =(0.4, 0.6, 1.1, 0.6)年- 1,\(\:\dot{ME}\) =(0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.4)年- 1,h-index=(0, 6, 16, 26), ha-index=(0.5, 3.4, 7.9, 12.6)。从1991年到2023年,每篇论文的作者中位数翻了一番,\(\:\dot{A}\)增加了36人%, while \(\:\dot{FL}\) and \(\:\dot{ME}\) were stable. Inter-institutional performance was comparable, including distributions of lower and higher-performing faculty. In conclusion, intercomparison of academic dermatologist bibliometric performance requires adjustments for career age and era. In the presented work, the authors provide tabulated data for percentile ranking of faculty. Research productivity, measured by \(\:\dot{FL}\) and \(\:\dot{ME}\), has not changed in over 30 years. Lastly, highly ranked institutions have similar distributions of lower and higher performers.
A Review of Academic Dermatologist Research Productivity Including Career Age Adjustments and Institutional Comparisons
The research productivity of academic dermatology faculty and institutions is frequently assessed by quantitative bibliometrics, for which there are few established benchmarks. The objective of this study was to quantify bibliometrics for dermatology faculty from high-performing academic institutions, measure productivity changes throughout a career, and analyze productivity changes over time. The authors obtained peer-reviewed articles from 1973 to 2023 using Scopus for 410 faculty dermatologists from the 10 highest-ranked United States institutions as determined by Doximity in 2023. This data was used to generate cumulative distribution functions for various bibliometric performance metrics as a function of both career age and among academic institutions. These metrics included authorships (\(\:\dot{A}\)), first or last authorships (\(\:\dot{FL}\)), monograph equivalents (\(\:\dot{ME}\)), h-index, and ha-index. The authors additionally explored bibliometric inflation from the period of 1991 to 2023. Publication rates increased substantially over the course of a dermatologist’s career and peaked after 15–25 years for \(\:\dot{FL}\) and \(\:\dot{ME}\). Median bibliometrics at career ages (1, 10, 20, 30) were \(\:\dot{A}\)=(1.0, 1.7, 3.4, 3.4) year− 1, \(\:\dot{FL}\)=(0.4, 0.6, 1.1, 0.6) year− 1, \(\:\dot{ME}\)=(0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.4) year− 1, h-index=(0, 6, 16, 26), and ha-index=(0.5, 3.4, 7.9, 12.6). Between 1991 and 2023, the median number of authors per paper doubled and \(\:\dot{A}\) increased by 36%, while \(\:\dot{FL}\) and \(\:\dot{ME}\) were stable. Inter-institutional performance was comparable, including distributions of lower and higher-performing faculty. In conclusion, intercomparison of academic dermatologist bibliometric performance requires adjustments for career age and era. In the presented work, the authors provide tabulated data for percentile ranking of faculty. Research productivity, measured by \(\:\dot{FL}\) and \(\:\dot{ME}\), has not changed in over 30 years. Lastly, highly ranked institutions have similar distributions of lower and higher performers.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.