灾难恢复-来自100个自然灾害的证据

IF 4.5 1区地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105764

Stephen Platt , Oliver Carpenter , Farnaz Mahdavian , Andrew Coburn

{"title":"灾难恢复-来自100个自然灾害的证据","authors":"Stephen Platt , Oliver Carpenter , Farnaz Mahdavian , Andrew Coburn","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the factors that affect the recovery process following 100 major natural disasters. The study aimed to measure the speed and quality of recovery and to begin to answer the question of why some places recover faster and better than others. This worldwide study, conducted over a 15-year period, covers four natural hazards: major floods, storms, earthquakes, and tsunamis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This paper considers resilience as a balance between speed and deliberation, and the ultimate quality of recovery, particularly in terms of improving resilience. Few places achieved both rapid and high-quality recovery. This suggests that managing the trade-off between speed and improvement is a critical challenge for places recovering from major disasters.</div><div>The dataset for this paper is publicly available from Dryad with a unique object identifier (DOI) <span><span>https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d7wm37qc0</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105764"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disaster recovery – Evidence from 100 natural disasters\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Platt , Oliver Carpenter , Farnaz Mahdavian , Andrew Coburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines the factors that affect the recovery process following 100 major natural disasters. The study aimed to measure the speed and quality of recovery and to begin to answer the question of why some places recover faster and better than others. This worldwide study, conducted over a 15-year period, covers four natural hazards: major floods, storms, earthquakes, and tsunamis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This paper considers resilience as a balance between speed and deliberation, and the ultimate quality of recovery, particularly in terms of improving resilience. Few places achieved both rapid and high-quality recovery. This suggests that managing the trade-off between speed and improvement is a critical challenge for places recovering from major disasters.</div><div>The dataset for this paper is publicly available from Dryad with a unique object identifier (DOI) <span><span>https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d7wm37qc0</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005886\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005886","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了100次重大自然灾害后影响灾后恢复过程的因素。这项研究旨在衡量恢复的速度和质量，并开始回答为什么有些地方比其他地方恢复得更快更好的问题。这项为期15年的全球研究涵盖了四种自然灾害：大洪水、风暴、地震和海啸。本文认为恢复力是速度和深思熟虑之间的平衡，以及恢复的最终质量，特别是在提高恢复力方面。很少有地方实现了快速和高质量的恢复。这表明，对于从重大灾害中恢复的地方来说，处理好速度和改善之间的权衡是一项关键挑战。本文的数据集可以通过唯一对象标识符（DOI） https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d7wm37qc0从Dryad公开获取。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Disaster recovery – Evidence from 100 natural disasters

This paper examines the factors that affect the recovery process following 100 major natural disasters. The study aimed to measure the speed and quality of recovery and to begin to answer the question of why some places recover faster and better than others. This worldwide study, conducted over a 15-year period, covers four natural hazards: major floods, storms, earthquakes, and tsunamis.

Results

This paper considers resilience as a balance between speed and deliberation, and the ultimate quality of recovery, particularly in terms of improving resilience. Few places achieved both rapid and high-quality recovery. This suggests that managing the trade-off between speed and improvement is a critical challenge for places recovering from major disasters.

The dataset for this paper is publicly available from Dryad with a unique object identifier (DOI) https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d7wm37qc0.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES

CiteScore

8.70

自引率

18.00%

发文量

688

审稿时长

79 days

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.