Zhu Liu , Qiulei Hong , Luyan Huang , Leihao Sha , Anjiao Peng , Lei Chen
{"title":"妊娠期间患有癫痫的妇女:对现行指南的系统回顾","authors":"Zhu Liu , Qiulei Hong , Luyan Huang , Leihao Sha , Anjiao Peng , Lei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate the quality of existing guidelines for the management of pregnancy in women with epilepsy (WWE) and compare their key recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review of available clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements was conducted. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Core information was extracted using a predefined form and subjected to comparative analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Only 14 guidelines on WWE pregnancy management have been published worldwide. Most guidelines performed well in scope definition, clarity of purpose, and presentation, but the evidence base was relatively weak. Recommendations were largely consistent across guidelines regarding preconception counseling, folic acid supplementation, vaginal delivery, breastfeeding, and avoidance of valproate. However, discrepancies were observed in the selection of certain antiseizure medications (ASMs), therapeutic drug monitoring, and the timing and dosage of folic acid supplementation. Current guidelines lack recommendations on newer ASMs and antinociceptive management during delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The variability in recommendations among WWE pregnancy management guidelines reflects the insufficiency of the existing evidence base, highlighting the need for enhanced methodological rigor in guideline development and more comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations. Establishing large-scale prospective pregnancy registries is critical for improving WWE pregnancy management guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 110658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women with epilepsy during pregnancy: A systematic review of current guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Zhu Liu , Qiulei Hong , Luyan Huang , Leihao Sha , Anjiao Peng , Lei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate the quality of existing guidelines for the management of pregnancy in women with epilepsy (WWE) and compare their key recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review of available clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements was conducted. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Core information was extracted using a predefined form and subjected to comparative analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Only 14 guidelines on WWE pregnancy management have been published worldwide. Most guidelines performed well in scope definition, clarity of purpose, and presentation, but the evidence base was relatively weak. Recommendations were largely consistent across guidelines regarding preconception counseling, folic acid supplementation, vaginal delivery, breastfeeding, and avoidance of valproate. However, discrepancies were observed in the selection of certain antiseizure medications (ASMs), therapeutic drug monitoring, and the timing and dosage of folic acid supplementation. Current guidelines lack recommendations on newer ASMs and antinociceptive management during delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The variability in recommendations among WWE pregnancy management guidelines reflects the insufficiency of the existing evidence base, highlighting the need for enhanced methodological rigor in guideline development and more comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations. Establishing large-scale prospective pregnancy registries is critical for improving WWE pregnancy management guidelines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110658\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025003981\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025003981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Women with epilepsy during pregnancy: A systematic review of current guidelines
Objective
To systematically evaluate the quality of existing guidelines for the management of pregnancy in women with epilepsy (WWE) and compare their key recommendations.
Methods
A systematic review of available clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements was conducted. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Core information was extracted using a predefined form and subjected to comparative analysis.
Results
Only 14 guidelines on WWE pregnancy management have been published worldwide. Most guidelines performed well in scope definition, clarity of purpose, and presentation, but the evidence base was relatively weak. Recommendations were largely consistent across guidelines regarding preconception counseling, folic acid supplementation, vaginal delivery, breastfeeding, and avoidance of valproate. However, discrepancies were observed in the selection of certain antiseizure medications (ASMs), therapeutic drug monitoring, and the timing and dosage of folic acid supplementation. Current guidelines lack recommendations on newer ASMs and antinociceptive management during delivery.
Conclusion
The variability in recommendations among WWE pregnancy management guidelines reflects the insufficiency of the existing evidence base, highlighting the need for enhanced methodological rigor in guideline development and more comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations. Establishing large-scale prospective pregnancy registries is critical for improving WWE pregnancy management guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging.
From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.