品牌联合品牌是否会引发股价波动?高管交易行为的内幕效应

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Guobin Zhao , Wei Shao , Haroon Iqbal Maseeh , Xue Lei , Ouwen Lin , Yanzhe Yuan
{"title":"品牌联合品牌是否会引发股价波动?高管交易行为的内幕效应","authors":"Guobin Zhao ,&nbsp;Wei Shao ,&nbsp;Haroon Iqbal Maseeh ,&nbsp;Xue Lei ,&nbsp;Ouwen Lin ,&nbsp;Yanzhe Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Brand co-branding has emerged as a key strategy for enterprises seeking to expand market reach and enhance competitiveness, becoming a prominent feature of modern business practice. However, its actual impact on firm value remains insufficiently validated. This paper investigates the effects of brand co-branding events on stock price volatility and the underlying mechanisms, using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2023 as the study sample. Employing difference-in-differences and triple-difference models, the analysis reveals that brand co-branding events generally trigger significant positive stock price reactions. Mechanism tests show that these events influence stock prices through two main channels: first, they increase institutional investors' attention, leading to higher institutional ownership; second, they prompt analysts to raise earnings forecasts, thereby transmitting positive market signals. Further analysis demonstrates that executive trading behavior significantly moderates the effect of co-branding where executive stock purchases prior to co-branding events serve as strong positive signals that amplify market reactions, while executive sales tend to dampen them. Cross-sectional analysis identifies distinct differences across co-branding types, with product co-branding generating significantly stronger market responses than marketing collaborations or intellectual property licensing. These findings not only validate the market relevance of brand co-branding but also highlight the critical role of executive trading behavior as an internal information signal, offering new empirical insights for corporate strategy formulation and investor decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 104589"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can brand co-branding trigger stock price volatility? The insider effect of executive trading behavior\",\"authors\":\"Guobin Zhao ,&nbsp;Wei Shao ,&nbsp;Haroon Iqbal Maseeh ,&nbsp;Xue Lei ,&nbsp;Ouwen Lin ,&nbsp;Yanzhe Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Brand co-branding has emerged as a key strategy for enterprises seeking to expand market reach and enhance competitiveness, becoming a prominent feature of modern business practice. However, its actual impact on firm value remains insufficiently validated. This paper investigates the effects of brand co-branding events on stock price volatility and the underlying mechanisms, using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2023 as the study sample. Employing difference-in-differences and triple-difference models, the analysis reveals that brand co-branding events generally trigger significant positive stock price reactions. Mechanism tests show that these events influence stock prices through two main channels: first, they increase institutional investors' attention, leading to higher institutional ownership; second, they prompt analysts to raise earnings forecasts, thereby transmitting positive market signals. Further analysis demonstrates that executive trading behavior significantly moderates the effect of co-branding where executive stock purchases prior to co-branding events serve as strong positive signals that amplify market reactions, while executive sales tend to dampen them. Cross-sectional analysis identifies distinct differences across co-branding types, with product co-branding generating significantly stronger market responses than marketing collaborations or intellectual property licensing. These findings not only validate the market relevance of brand co-branding but also highlight the critical role of executive trading behavior as an internal information signal, offering new empirical insights for corporate strategy formulation and investor decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925006763\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925006763","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

品牌联合品牌化已成为企业扩大市场覆盖面和增强竞争力的重要战略,成为现代商业实践的显著特征。然而,其对企业价值的实际影响仍未得到充分验证。本文以2015 - 2023年中国a股上市公司为研究样本,研究品牌联合事件对股价波动的影响及其机制。采用差异中的差异和三差异模型,分析表明品牌联合事件通常会引发显著的积极股价反应。机制检验表明,这些事件通过两个主要渠道影响股价:一是增加了机构投资者的关注度,导致机构持股率提高;其次,它们促使分析师提高盈利预期,从而传递积极的市场信号。进一步的分析表明,高管交易行为显著调节了联合品牌效应,其中高管在联合品牌活动之前购买股票作为强烈的积极信号,放大了市场反应,而高管销售往往会抑制市场反应。横断面分析确定了联合品牌类型之间的明显差异,产品联合品牌产生的市场反应明显强于营销合作或知识产权许可。这些发现不仅验证了品牌联合品牌的市场相关性,而且突出了高管交易行为作为内部信息信号的关键作用,为企业战略制定和投资者决策提供了新的实证见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can brand co-branding trigger stock price volatility? The insider effect of executive trading behavior
Brand co-branding has emerged as a key strategy for enterprises seeking to expand market reach and enhance competitiveness, becoming a prominent feature of modern business practice. However, its actual impact on firm value remains insufficiently validated. This paper investigates the effects of brand co-branding events on stock price volatility and the underlying mechanisms, using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2023 as the study sample. Employing difference-in-differences and triple-difference models, the analysis reveals that brand co-branding events generally trigger significant positive stock price reactions. Mechanism tests show that these events influence stock prices through two main channels: first, they increase institutional investors' attention, leading to higher institutional ownership; second, they prompt analysts to raise earnings forecasts, thereby transmitting positive market signals. Further analysis demonstrates that executive trading behavior significantly moderates the effect of co-branding where executive stock purchases prior to co-branding events serve as strong positive signals that amplify market reactions, while executive sales tend to dampen them. Cross-sectional analysis identifies distinct differences across co-branding types, with product co-branding generating significantly stronger market responses than marketing collaborations or intellectual property licensing. These findings not only validate the market relevance of brand co-branding but also highlight the critical role of executive trading behavior as an internal information signal, offering new empirical insights for corporate strategy formulation and investor decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信