Sayedmohsen Mortazavi Najafabadi , Dariusz Grzelczyk , Mohammed N. Ashtiani
{"title":"一种新的本体感觉敏锐度测量装置:对年轻人和老年人的效度和信度分析","authors":"Sayedmohsen Mortazavi Najafabadi , Dariusz Grzelczyk , Mohammed N. Ashtiani","doi":"10.1016/j.bbe.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Age, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, and sports injuries can all impair proprioception, i.e. a crucial sensory feedback system for balance control and gait. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of a recently constructed device for measuring proprioceptive function. Forty-seven participants, comprising 26 younger healthy adults (20–40 years) and 21 older adults (> 65 years), were evaluated. The ankle’s sense of motion (SoM) sensitivity and sense of position (SoP, active/passive) acuity were measured by the device. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) were used as indicators of reliability and validity. The results showed excellent reliability for SoM sensitivity in dorsiflexion (ICC = 0.985 for younger, 0.98 for older) and plantarflexion (ICC = 0.972 for younger, 0.982 for older). High reliability was also observed in passive SoP acuity (ICC = 0.825 – 0.989). However, the reliability of the active SoP acuity method was poor to moderate. Strong discriminative validity was demonstrated by the AUC-ROC values, with SoM sensitivity distinguishing between younger and older participants with an accuracy of over 91 %. Bland-Altman analysis revealed tighter agreement for SoM sensitivity (18 to 40 % of the device precision) than passive SoP acuity (70 to 90 % of the device precision), as well as minimal systematic bias (−0.03 to −0.01 degrees) to show interday test–retest reliability. According to these results, the device is valid for evaluating proprioceptive function, particularly SoM sensitivity, and it may be useful in clinical and research settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55381,"journal":{"name":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":"45 3","pages":"Pages 580-589"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel device for proprioceptive acuity measurement: Validity and reliability analysis in young and older adults\",\"authors\":\"Sayedmohsen Mortazavi Najafabadi , Dariusz Grzelczyk , Mohammed N. Ashtiani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbe.2025.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Age, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, and sports injuries can all impair proprioception, i.e. a crucial sensory feedback system for balance control and gait. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of a recently constructed device for measuring proprioceptive function. Forty-seven participants, comprising 26 younger healthy adults (20–40 years) and 21 older adults (> 65 years), were evaluated. The ankle’s sense of motion (SoM) sensitivity and sense of position (SoP, active/passive) acuity were measured by the device. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) were used as indicators of reliability and validity. The results showed excellent reliability for SoM sensitivity in dorsiflexion (ICC = 0.985 for younger, 0.98 for older) and plantarflexion (ICC = 0.972 for younger, 0.982 for older). High reliability was also observed in passive SoP acuity (ICC = 0.825 – 0.989). However, the reliability of the active SoP acuity method was poor to moderate. Strong discriminative validity was demonstrated by the AUC-ROC values, with SoM sensitivity distinguishing between younger and older participants with an accuracy of over 91 %. Bland-Altman analysis revealed tighter agreement for SoM sensitivity (18 to 40 % of the device precision) than passive SoP acuity (70 to 90 % of the device precision), as well as minimal systematic bias (−0.03 to −0.01 degrees) to show interday test–retest reliability. According to these results, the device is valid for evaluating proprioceptive function, particularly SoM sensitivity, and it may be useful in clinical and research settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 580-589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521625000622\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521625000622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A novel device for proprioceptive acuity measurement: Validity and reliability analysis in young and older adults
Age, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, and sports injuries can all impair proprioception, i.e. a crucial sensory feedback system for balance control and gait. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of a recently constructed device for measuring proprioceptive function. Forty-seven participants, comprising 26 younger healthy adults (20–40 years) and 21 older adults (> 65 years), were evaluated. The ankle’s sense of motion (SoM) sensitivity and sense of position (SoP, active/passive) acuity were measured by the device. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) were used as indicators of reliability and validity. The results showed excellent reliability for SoM sensitivity in dorsiflexion (ICC = 0.985 for younger, 0.98 for older) and plantarflexion (ICC = 0.972 for younger, 0.982 for older). High reliability was also observed in passive SoP acuity (ICC = 0.825 – 0.989). However, the reliability of the active SoP acuity method was poor to moderate. Strong discriminative validity was demonstrated by the AUC-ROC values, with SoM sensitivity distinguishing between younger and older participants with an accuracy of over 91 %. Bland-Altman analysis revealed tighter agreement for SoM sensitivity (18 to 40 % of the device precision) than passive SoP acuity (70 to 90 % of the device precision), as well as minimal systematic bias (−0.03 to −0.01 degrees) to show interday test–retest reliability. According to these results, the device is valid for evaluating proprioceptive function, particularly SoM sensitivity, and it may be useful in clinical and research settings.
期刊介绍:
Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering is a quarterly journal, founded in 1981, devoted to publishing the results of original, innovative and creative research investigations in the field of Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering, which bridges mathematical, physical, chemical and engineering methods and technology to analyse physiological processes in living organisms as well as to develop methods, devices and systems used in biology and medicine, mainly in medical diagnosis, monitoring systems and therapy. The Journal''s mission is to advance scientific discovery into new or improved standards of care, and promotion a wide-ranging exchange between science and its application to humans.