奖学金招募：哪些因素影响骨科申请者选择关节置换/创伤联合奖学金项目？

IF 2 3区医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE

Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2025.112685

Nickolas L. Van Roekel , Travis D. Parkulo , Sandy Vang , Gaonhia Y. Moua , Edwin G. Rosado Hernandez , Gennadiy A. Busel

{"title":"奖学金招募：哪些因素影响骨科申请者选择关节置换/创伤联合奖学金项目？","authors":"Nickolas L. Van Roekel , Travis D. Parkulo , Sandy Vang , Gaonhia Y. Moua , Edwin G. Rosado Hernandez , Gennadiy A. Busel","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To prepare junior surgeons for possible increased trauma call burden and improve young surgeons’ workplace marketability, there has been an increase in fellowship programs offering combined arthroplasty and trauma curriculums. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative importance of factors considered by applicants applying to combined programs. This information will serve program directors, who can improve applicant recruitment, along with improving the experiences of fellows.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Survey respondents were asked to rate 23 fellowship program factors on a 1-to-5 Likert scale with 1 being “not important at all” and 5 being “critical”. Respondents were also asked to list their top 5 factors in order of decreasing importance with 1 being the most important. A two-sample <em>t</em>-test was used to analyze subgroups. Statistical significance defined as <em>P</em>-value < 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Surveys were sent to 192 applicants, and 75 responses were received with a 39.1 % response rate. The overall highest rated factors were operative experience (mean 4.87; SD 0.34), revision total joint experience (mean 4.61; SD 0.61), periprosthetic fracture experience (mean 4.52; SD 0.60), and primary total joint experience (mean 4.17; SD 0.86). A subgroup analysis was performed by creating three groups: surgical experience, program details and history, and financial factors. Surgical experience group was ranked highest (mean 3.81; SD 1.72). Programs details and history (mean 3.12; SD 1.05) and financial factors (mean 2.35; SD 1.08) rated significantly lower than surgical experience (<em>P</em>-value < 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Applicants of combined arthroplasty and trauma fellowships value similar characteristics in a program as those applying to either arthroplasty or trauma alone. Combined fellowship programs should update their websites as applicants frequently use online sources to educate themselves on existing programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 11","pages":"Article 112685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fellowship recruitment: Which factors influence orthopaedic applicants to choose a combined arthroplasty/trauma fellowship program?\",\"authors\":\"Nickolas L. Van Roekel , Travis D. Parkulo , Sandy Vang , Gaonhia Y. Moua , Edwin G. Rosado Hernandez , Gennadiy A. Busel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To prepare junior surgeons for possible increased trauma call burden and improve young surgeons’ workplace marketability, there has been an increase in fellowship programs offering combined arthroplasty and trauma curriculums. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative importance of factors considered by applicants applying to combined programs. This information will serve program directors, who can improve applicant recruitment, along with improving the experiences of fellows.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Survey respondents were asked to rate 23 fellowship program factors on a 1-to-5 Likert scale with 1 being “not important at all” and 5 being “critical”. Respondents were also asked to list their top 5 factors in order of decreasing importance with 1 being the most important. A two-sample <em>t</em>-test was used to analyze subgroups. Statistical significance defined as <em>P</em>-value < 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Surveys were sent to 192 applicants, and 75 responses were received with a 39.1 % response rate. The overall highest rated factors were operative experience (mean 4.87; SD 0.34), revision total joint experience (mean 4.61; SD 0.61), periprosthetic fracture experience (mean 4.52; SD 0.60), and primary total joint experience (mean 4.17; SD 0.86). A subgroup analysis was performed by creating three groups: surgical experience, program details and history, and financial factors. Surgical experience group was ranked highest (mean 3.81; SD 1.72). Programs details and history (mean 3.12; SD 1.05) and financial factors (mean 2.35; SD 1.08) rated significantly lower than surgical experience (<em>P</em>-value < 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Applicants of combined arthroplasty and trauma fellowships value similar characteristics in a program as those applying to either arthroplasty or trauma alone. Combined fellowship programs should update their websites as applicants frequently use online sources to educate themselves on existing programs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 112685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005443\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：为了让初级外科医生为可能增加的创伤呼叫负担做好准备，并提高年轻外科医生的工作市场竞争力，提供关节置换术和创伤联合课程的奖学金项目有所增加。本研究的目的是确定申请人申请联合课程时考虑的因素的相对重要性。这些信息将为项目主管服务，他们可以改善申请人的招聘，同时改善研究员的经验。调查对象被要求按照1到5的李克特量表对23个奖学金项目因素进行评分，1代表“一点也不重要”，5代表“至关重要”。受访者还被要求列出他们最重要的5个因素，按重要性递减的顺序，1是最重要的。亚组分析采用双样本t检验。统计学显著性定义为p值<； 0.05。结果共向192名申请人发出问卷，收到75份回复，回复率为39.1%。总体评分最高的因素是手术经验（平均4.87;SD 0.34）、翻修总关节经验（平均4.61;SD 0.61）、假体周围骨折经验（平均4.52;SD 0.60）和原发性总关节经验（平均4.17;SD 0.86）。通过创建三组进行亚组分析：手术经验，方案细节和历史，以及经济因素。手术经验组评分最高（平均3.81；标准差1.72）。方案细节和病史（平均3.12,SD 1.05）和经济因素（平均2.35,SD 1.08）评分明显低于手术经验（p值<； 0.01）。结论：关节置换术和创伤联合奖学金的申请者看重与单纯关节置换术或创伤联合奖学金的申请者相似的特点。联合奖学金项目应该更新他们的网站，因为申请者经常使用在线资源来学习现有的项目。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Fellowship recruitment: Which factors influence orthopaedic applicants to choose a combined arthroplasty/trauma fellowship program?

Background

To prepare junior surgeons for possible increased trauma call burden and improve young surgeons’ workplace marketability, there has been an increase in fellowship programs offering combined arthroplasty and trauma curriculums. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative importance of factors considered by applicants applying to combined programs. This information will serve program directors, who can improve applicant recruitment, along with improving the experiences of fellows.

Methods

Survey respondents were asked to rate 23 fellowship program factors on a 1-to-5 Likert scale with 1 being “not important at all” and 5 being “critical”. Respondents were also asked to list their top 5 factors in order of decreasing importance with 1 being the most important. A two-sample t-test was used to analyze subgroups. Statistical significance defined as P-value < 0.05.

Results

Surveys were sent to 192 applicants, and 75 responses were received with a 39.1 % response rate. The overall highest rated factors were operative experience (mean 4.87; SD 0.34), revision total joint experience (mean 4.61; SD 0.61), periprosthetic fracture experience (mean 4.52; SD 0.60), and primary total joint experience (mean 4.17; SD 0.86). A subgroup analysis was performed by creating three groups: surgical experience, program details and history, and financial factors. Surgical experience group was ranked highest (mean 3.81; SD 1.72). Programs details and history (mean 3.12; SD 1.05) and financial factors (mean 2.35; SD 1.08) rated significantly lower than surgical experience (P-value < 0.01).

Conclusions

Applicants of combined arthroplasty and trauma fellowships value similar characteristics in a program as those applying to either arthroplasty or trauma alone. Combined fellowship programs should update their websites as applicants frequently use online sources to educate themselves on existing programs.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured 医学-急救医学

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

8.00%

发文量

699

审稿时长

96 days

期刊介绍： Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.