{"title":"绿色行动:企业减少碳排放以应对政治风险","authors":"Pradip Banerjee , Sudipta Bose , Sandip Dhole , Cameron Truong","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores whether firms decrease their carbon emissions in response to heightened political risk. Political risk often imposes significant economic consequences, prompting companies to engage in costly strategies such as political lobbying. Alternatively, firms may opt to manage their emissions to partially mitigate political risk. We posit that high carbon emissions can attract unwanted political scrutiny, making emissions reduction a strategic response to escalating political risk. Our findings demonstrate that firms indeed lower their emissions in response to political risk. Moreover, we find that specific firm characteristics can affect the relationship between political risk and carbon emissions. Finally, we show that firms achieve emissions reductions through investments in environmental innovation. To investigate robustness, we employ multiple identification strategies, including entropy balancing, instrumental variable analysis, and quasi-natural experiments. Our findings highlight the strategic importance of emissions reduction as a response to political risk, offering insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision-makers on aligning sustainability efforts with risk management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108847"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greening up their act: Corporate carbon emissions reduction in response to political risk\",\"authors\":\"Pradip Banerjee , Sudipta Bose , Sandip Dhole , Cameron Truong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores whether firms decrease their carbon emissions in response to heightened political risk. Political risk often imposes significant economic consequences, prompting companies to engage in costly strategies such as political lobbying. Alternatively, firms may opt to manage their emissions to partially mitigate political risk. We posit that high carbon emissions can attract unwanted political scrutiny, making emissions reduction a strategic response to escalating political risk. Our findings demonstrate that firms indeed lower their emissions in response to political risk. Moreover, we find that specific firm characteristics can affect the relationship between political risk and carbon emissions. Finally, we show that firms achieve emissions reductions through investments in environmental innovation. To investigate robustness, we employ multiple identification strategies, including entropy balancing, instrumental variable analysis, and quasi-natural experiments. Our findings highlight the strategic importance of emissions reduction as a response to political risk, offering insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision-makers on aligning sustainability efforts with risk management strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006747\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Greening up their act: Corporate carbon emissions reduction in response to political risk
This study explores whether firms decrease their carbon emissions in response to heightened political risk. Political risk often imposes significant economic consequences, prompting companies to engage in costly strategies such as political lobbying. Alternatively, firms may opt to manage their emissions to partially mitigate political risk. We posit that high carbon emissions can attract unwanted political scrutiny, making emissions reduction a strategic response to escalating political risk. Our findings demonstrate that firms indeed lower their emissions in response to political risk. Moreover, we find that specific firm characteristics can affect the relationship between political risk and carbon emissions. Finally, we show that firms achieve emissions reductions through investments in environmental innovation. To investigate robustness, we employ multiple identification strategies, including entropy balancing, instrumental variable analysis, and quasi-natural experiments. Our findings highlight the strategic importance of emissions reduction as a response to political risk, offering insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate decision-makers on aligning sustainability efforts with risk management strategies.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.