Sungju Han , Jasna Plavsic , Diana Dushkova , Oliver Gebhardt , Katarzyna Izydorczyk , Jelena Kovačević-Majkić , Kinga Krauze , Martyna Kuzior , Renata Włodarczyk-Marciniak , Christian Kuhlicke
{"title":"超越个体障碍:理解和应对基于自然的解决方案实施挑战的系统方法","authors":"Sungju Han , Jasna Plavsic , Diana Dushkova , Oliver Gebhardt , Katarzyna Izydorczyk , Jelena Kovačević-Majkić , Kinga Krauze , Martyna Kuzior , Renata Włodarczyk-Marciniak , Christian Kuhlicke","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2025.100739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study advances our understanding of barriers to Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) implementation by applying Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) to analyze how implementation challenges influence each other within complex systems across six European river basins. Moving beyond traditional approaches that treat barriers as isolated challenges, we identify three distinct barrier system typologies—institutional-legal-political dominant systems (Type I), knowledge-awareness deficit systems (Type II), and tightly coupled networks (Type III). Our analysis reveals four key feedback mechanisms—Knowledge and Awareness, Political Will and Resources, Implementation Challenges, and Institutional Fragmentation—that create self-reinforcing cycles affecting NBS adoption. By quantifying both barrier centrality and the strength of their relationships, we identify strategic intervention points that could effectively catalyze system-wide improvements. Financial resources and political will emerge as universally important barriers, while knowledge-related barriers demonstrate context-specific importance. The study contributes methodologically by demonstrating how systems thinking can reveal previously hidden barrier interactions, and practically by identifying targeted intervention strategies for different barrier system types, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners working to accelerate NBS implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54226,"journal":{"name":"Climate Risk Management","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100739"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond individual barriers: a systems approach to understanding and addressing nature-based solutions implementation challenges\",\"authors\":\"Sungju Han , Jasna Plavsic , Diana Dushkova , Oliver Gebhardt , Katarzyna Izydorczyk , Jelena Kovačević-Majkić , Kinga Krauze , Martyna Kuzior , Renata Włodarczyk-Marciniak , Christian Kuhlicke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crm.2025.100739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study advances our understanding of barriers to Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) implementation by applying Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) to analyze how implementation challenges influence each other within complex systems across six European river basins. Moving beyond traditional approaches that treat barriers as isolated challenges, we identify three distinct barrier system typologies—institutional-legal-political dominant systems (Type I), knowledge-awareness deficit systems (Type II), and tightly coupled networks (Type III). Our analysis reveals four key feedback mechanisms—Knowledge and Awareness, Political Will and Resources, Implementation Challenges, and Institutional Fragmentation—that create self-reinforcing cycles affecting NBS adoption. By quantifying both barrier centrality and the strength of their relationships, we identify strategic intervention points that could effectively catalyze system-wide improvements. Financial resources and political will emerge as universally important barriers, while knowledge-related barriers demonstrate context-specific importance. The study contributes methodologically by demonstrating how systems thinking can reveal previously hidden barrier interactions, and practically by identifying targeted intervention strategies for different barrier system types, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners working to accelerate NBS implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096325000531\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096325000531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond individual barriers: a systems approach to understanding and addressing nature-based solutions implementation challenges
This study advances our understanding of barriers to Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) implementation by applying Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) to analyze how implementation challenges influence each other within complex systems across six European river basins. Moving beyond traditional approaches that treat barriers as isolated challenges, we identify three distinct barrier system typologies—institutional-legal-political dominant systems (Type I), knowledge-awareness deficit systems (Type II), and tightly coupled networks (Type III). Our analysis reveals four key feedback mechanisms—Knowledge and Awareness, Political Will and Resources, Implementation Challenges, and Institutional Fragmentation—that create self-reinforcing cycles affecting NBS adoption. By quantifying both barrier centrality and the strength of their relationships, we identify strategic intervention points that could effectively catalyze system-wide improvements. Financial resources and political will emerge as universally important barriers, while knowledge-related barriers demonstrate context-specific importance. The study contributes methodologically by demonstrating how systems thinking can reveal previously hidden barrier interactions, and practically by identifying targeted intervention strategies for different barrier system types, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners working to accelerate NBS implementation.
期刊介绍:
Climate Risk Management publishes original scientific contributions, state-of-the-art reviews and reports of practical experience on the use of knowledge and information regarding the consequences of climate variability and climate change in decision and policy making on climate change responses from the near- to long-term.
The concept of climate risk management refers to activities and methods that are used by individuals, organizations, and institutions to facilitate climate-resilient decision-making. Its objective is to promote sustainable development by maximizing the beneficial impacts of climate change responses and minimizing negative impacts across the full spectrum of geographies and sectors that are potentially affected by the changing climate.