超越个体障碍:理解和应对基于自然的解决方案实施挑战的系统方法

IF 5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sungju Han , Jasna Plavsic , Diana Dushkova , Oliver Gebhardt , Katarzyna Izydorczyk , Jelena Kovačević-Majkić , Kinga Krauze , Martyna Kuzior , Renata Włodarczyk-Marciniak , Christian Kuhlicke
{"title":"超越个体障碍:理解和应对基于自然的解决方案实施挑战的系统方法","authors":"Sungju Han ,&nbsp;Jasna Plavsic ,&nbsp;Diana Dushkova ,&nbsp;Oliver Gebhardt ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Izydorczyk ,&nbsp;Jelena Kovačević-Majkić ,&nbsp;Kinga Krauze ,&nbsp;Martyna Kuzior ,&nbsp;Renata Włodarczyk-Marciniak ,&nbsp;Christian Kuhlicke","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2025.100739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study advances our understanding of barriers to Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) implementation by applying Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) to analyze how implementation challenges influence each other within complex systems across six European river basins. Moving beyond traditional approaches that treat barriers as isolated challenges, we identify three distinct barrier system typologies—institutional-legal-political dominant systems (Type I), knowledge-awareness deficit systems (Type II), and tightly coupled networks (Type III). Our analysis reveals four key feedback mechanisms—Knowledge and Awareness, Political Will and Resources, Implementation Challenges, and Institutional Fragmentation—that create self-reinforcing cycles affecting NBS adoption. By quantifying both barrier centrality and the strength of their relationships, we identify strategic intervention points that could effectively catalyze system-wide improvements. Financial resources and political will emerge as universally important barriers, while knowledge-related barriers demonstrate context-specific importance. The study contributes methodologically by demonstrating how systems thinking can reveal previously hidden barrier interactions, and practically by identifying targeted intervention strategies for different barrier system types, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners working to accelerate NBS implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54226,"journal":{"name":"Climate Risk Management","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100739"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond individual barriers: a systems approach to understanding and addressing nature-based solutions implementation challenges\",\"authors\":\"Sungju Han ,&nbsp;Jasna Plavsic ,&nbsp;Diana Dushkova ,&nbsp;Oliver Gebhardt ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Izydorczyk ,&nbsp;Jelena Kovačević-Majkić ,&nbsp;Kinga Krauze ,&nbsp;Martyna Kuzior ,&nbsp;Renata Włodarczyk-Marciniak ,&nbsp;Christian Kuhlicke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crm.2025.100739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study advances our understanding of barriers to Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) implementation by applying Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) to analyze how implementation challenges influence each other within complex systems across six European river basins. Moving beyond traditional approaches that treat barriers as isolated challenges, we identify three distinct barrier system typologies—institutional-legal-political dominant systems (Type I), knowledge-awareness deficit systems (Type II), and tightly coupled networks (Type III). Our analysis reveals four key feedback mechanisms—Knowledge and Awareness, Political Will and Resources, Implementation Challenges, and Institutional Fragmentation—that create self-reinforcing cycles affecting NBS adoption. By quantifying both barrier centrality and the strength of their relationships, we identify strategic intervention points that could effectively catalyze system-wide improvements. Financial resources and political will emerge as universally important barriers, while knowledge-related barriers demonstrate context-specific importance. The study contributes methodologically by demonstrating how systems thinking can reveal previously hidden barrier interactions, and practically by identifying targeted intervention strategies for different barrier system types, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners working to accelerate NBS implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096325000531\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096325000531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过应用模糊认知映射(FCM)来分析六个欧洲河流流域复杂系统中实施挑战如何相互影响,从而提高了我们对基于自然的解决方案(NBS)实施障碍的理解。超越将障碍视为孤立挑战的传统方法,我们确定了三种不同的障碍系统类型:制度-法律-政治主导系统(类型I),知识-意识缺陷系统(类型II)和紧密耦合网络(类型III)。我们的分析揭示了四个关键的反馈机制——知识和意识、政治意愿和资源、实施挑战和制度碎片化——它们形成了影响国家统计局采用的自我强化循环。通过量化障碍中心性和它们之间关系的强度,我们确定了可以有效促进全系统改进的战略干预点。财政资源和政治意愿成为普遍重要的障碍,而与知识有关的障碍则显示出具体情况的重要性。该研究在方法上的贡献在于展示了系统思维如何揭示先前隐藏的障碍相互作用,并在实践上通过确定针对不同障碍系统类型的有针对性的干预策略,为政策制定者和从业者加速NBS的实施提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond individual barriers: a systems approach to understanding and addressing nature-based solutions implementation challenges
This study advances our understanding of barriers to Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) implementation by applying Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) to analyze how implementation challenges influence each other within complex systems across six European river basins. Moving beyond traditional approaches that treat barriers as isolated challenges, we identify three distinct barrier system typologies—institutional-legal-political dominant systems (Type I), knowledge-awareness deficit systems (Type II), and tightly coupled networks (Type III). Our analysis reveals four key feedback mechanisms—Knowledge and Awareness, Political Will and Resources, Implementation Challenges, and Institutional Fragmentation—that create self-reinforcing cycles affecting NBS adoption. By quantifying both barrier centrality and the strength of their relationships, we identify strategic intervention points that could effectively catalyze system-wide improvements. Financial resources and political will emerge as universally important barriers, while knowledge-related barriers demonstrate context-specific importance. The study contributes methodologically by demonstrating how systems thinking can reveal previously hidden barrier interactions, and practically by identifying targeted intervention strategies for different barrier system types, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners working to accelerate NBS implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climate Risk Management
Climate Risk Management Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Climate Risk Management publishes original scientific contributions, state-of-the-art reviews and reports of practical experience on the use of knowledge and information regarding the consequences of climate variability and climate change in decision and policy making on climate change responses from the near- to long-term. The concept of climate risk management refers to activities and methods that are used by individuals, organizations, and institutions to facilitate climate-resilient decision-making. Its objective is to promote sustainable development by maximizing the beneficial impacts of climate change responses and minimizing negative impacts across the full spectrum of geographies and sectors that are potentially affected by the changing climate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信