猪到人的肺异种移植到脑死亡接受者身上

IF 50 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Jianxing He, Jiang Shi, Chao Yang, Guilin Peng, Chunrong Ju, Yi Zhao, Hui Liu, Ping He, Xiaoqing Liu, Zuopeng Zhang, Chuanbao Chen, Dengke Pan, Zifeng Yang, Wenda Guang, Hongtao Li, Zhonghua Chen, Menyang Liu, Hengrui Liang, Weiqing Huang, Kyeongman Jeon, Toyofumi F. Chen-Yoshikawa, A. Justin Rucker, Amos Lal, Nanshan Zhong, Kang Zhang, Xiaoyou Liu, Xin Xu
{"title":"猪到人的肺异种移植到脑死亡接受者身上","authors":"Jianxing He, Jiang Shi, Chao Yang, Guilin Peng, Chunrong Ju, Yi Zhao, Hui Liu, Ping He, Xiaoqing Liu, Zuopeng Zhang, Chuanbao Chen, Dengke Pan, Zifeng Yang, Wenda Guang, Hongtao Li, Zhonghua Chen, Menyang Liu, Hengrui Liang, Weiqing Huang, Kyeongman Jeon, Toyofumi F. Chen-Yoshikawa, A. Justin Rucker, Amos Lal, Nanshan Zhong, Kang Zhang, Xiaoyou Liu, Xin Xu","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03861-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genetically engineered pig lungs have not previously been transplanted into humans, leaving key questions unanswered regarding the human immune response in the context of a xenotransplanted lung and the possibility of hyperacute rejection. Here, we report a case of pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation, in which a lung from a six-gene-edited pig was transplanted into a 39-year-old brain-dead male human recipient following a brain hemorrhage. The lung xenograft maintained viability and functionality over the course of the 216 hours of the monitoring period, without signs of hyperacute rejection or infection. Severe edema resembling primary graft dysfunction was observed at 24 hours after transplantation, potentially due to ischemia–reperfusion injury. Antibody-mediated rejection appeared to contribute to xenograft damage on postoperative days 3 and 6, with partial recovery by day 9. Immunosuppression included rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, basiliximab, rituximab, eculizumab, tofacitinib, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and tapering steroids, with adjustments made during the postoperative period based on assessments of immune status. Although this study demonstrates the feasibility of pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation, substantial challenges relating to organ rejection and infection remain, and further preclinical studies are necessary before clinical translation of this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation into a brain-dead recipient\",\"authors\":\"Jianxing He, Jiang Shi, Chao Yang, Guilin Peng, Chunrong Ju, Yi Zhao, Hui Liu, Ping He, Xiaoqing Liu, Zuopeng Zhang, Chuanbao Chen, Dengke Pan, Zifeng Yang, Wenda Guang, Hongtao Li, Zhonghua Chen, Menyang Liu, Hengrui Liang, Weiqing Huang, Kyeongman Jeon, Toyofumi F. Chen-Yoshikawa, A. Justin Rucker, Amos Lal, Nanshan Zhong, Kang Zhang, Xiaoyou Liu, Xin Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03861-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Genetically engineered pig lungs have not previously been transplanted into humans, leaving key questions unanswered regarding the human immune response in the context of a xenotransplanted lung and the possibility of hyperacute rejection. Here, we report a case of pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation, in which a lung from a six-gene-edited pig was transplanted into a 39-year-old brain-dead male human recipient following a brain hemorrhage. The lung xenograft maintained viability and functionality over the course of the 216 hours of the monitoring period, without signs of hyperacute rejection or infection. Severe edema resembling primary graft dysfunction was observed at 24 hours after transplantation, potentially due to ischemia–reperfusion injury. Antibody-mediated rejection appeared to contribute to xenograft damage on postoperative days 3 and 6, with partial recovery by day 9. Immunosuppression included rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, basiliximab, rituximab, eculizumab, tofacitinib, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and tapering steroids, with adjustments made during the postoperative period based on assessments of immune status. Although this study demonstrates the feasibility of pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation, substantial challenges relating to organ rejection and infection remain, and further preclinical studies are necessary before clinical translation of this procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03861-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03861-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因工程猪肺以前还没有被移植到人类身上,留下了关于异种移植肺背景下人类免疫反应和超急性排斥反应可能性的关键问题。在这里,我们报告了一例猪到人的肺异种移植,其中一只经过6个基因编辑的猪的肺被移植到一名39岁的脑死亡男性人类受体脑出血后。在216小时的监测期间,异种移植肺保持了活力和功能,没有出现超急性排斥反应或感染的迹象。移植后24小时观察到严重水肿,类似于原发性移植物功能障碍,可能是由于缺血再灌注损伤。抗体介导的排斥反应似乎在术后第3天和第6天导致异种移植物损伤,第9天部分恢复。免疫抑制包括兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白、basiliximab、rituximab、eculizumab、tofacitinib、他克莫司、霉酚酸酯和减肥性类固醇,并在术后根据免疫状态评估进行调整。尽管这项研究证明了猪到人的肺异种移植的可行性,但与器官排斥和感染相关的重大挑战仍然存在,在临床应用这一程序之前,需要进一步的临床前研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation into a brain-dead recipient

Pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation into a brain-dead recipient

Genetically engineered pig lungs have not previously been transplanted into humans, leaving key questions unanswered regarding the human immune response in the context of a xenotransplanted lung and the possibility of hyperacute rejection. Here, we report a case of pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation, in which a lung from a six-gene-edited pig was transplanted into a 39-year-old brain-dead male human recipient following a brain hemorrhage. The lung xenograft maintained viability and functionality over the course of the 216 hours of the monitoring period, without signs of hyperacute rejection or infection. Severe edema resembling primary graft dysfunction was observed at 24 hours after transplantation, potentially due to ischemia–reperfusion injury. Antibody-mediated rejection appeared to contribute to xenograft damage on postoperative days 3 and 6, with partial recovery by day 9. Immunosuppression included rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, basiliximab, rituximab, eculizumab, tofacitinib, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and tapering steroids, with adjustments made during the postoperative period based on assessments of immune status. Although this study demonstrates the feasibility of pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation, substantial challenges relating to organ rejection and infection remain, and further preclinical studies are necessary before clinical translation of this procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信