权力作为道德放大镜:当权贵越轨时,道德义愤会被放大

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Rachel C. Forbes, Robb Willer, Jennifer E. Stellar
{"title":"权力作为道德放大镜:当权贵越轨时,道德义愤会被放大","authors":"Rachel C. Forbes, Robb Willer, Jennifer E. Stellar","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moral outrage in response to scandals involving powerful figures has become commonplace in modern life. These instances suggest that moral outrage may be disproportionately directed upward toward those with power over others. However, it remains unclear whether this tendency simply reflects the greater incidence and prominence of immoral acts committed by individuals with power or whether it indicates a deeper tendency for powerful perpetrators to elicit greater outrage in observers. In a series of studies, we investigated whether observers' moral outrage was influenced by a perpetrator's power within a social hierarchy. Participants read hypothetical scenarios (Study 1; <ce:italic>N</ce:italic> = 481), recalled actual transgressions (Study 2; <ce:italic>N</ce:italic> = 351), witnessed selfish economic behaviour (Study 3; <ce:italic>N</ce:italic> = 1012), and observed bullying in person (Study 4; <ce:italic>N</ce:italic> = 177) committed by either more or less powerful perpetrators. Participants consistently experienced greater moral outrage and delivered more severe (anonymous) punishment to powerful perpetrators. Greater reactivity to powerful perpetrators was confined to the domain of morality and specific to the transgressor’s power, rather than their status. This work highlights the importance of social contextual factors like a perpetrators power within a hierarchy when studying moral judgment.","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power as a moral magnifier: Moral outrage is amplified when the powerful transgress\",\"authors\":\"Rachel C. Forbes, Robb Willer, Jennifer E. Stellar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Moral outrage in response to scandals involving powerful figures has become commonplace in modern life. These instances suggest that moral outrage may be disproportionately directed upward toward those with power over others. However, it remains unclear whether this tendency simply reflects the greater incidence and prominence of immoral acts committed by individuals with power or whether it indicates a deeper tendency for powerful perpetrators to elicit greater outrage in observers. In a series of studies, we investigated whether observers' moral outrage was influenced by a perpetrator's power within a social hierarchy. Participants read hypothetical scenarios (Study 1; <ce:italic>N</ce:italic> = 481), recalled actual transgressions (Study 2; <ce:italic>N</ce:italic> = 351), witnessed selfish economic behaviour (Study 3; <ce:italic>N</ce:italic> = 1012), and observed bullying in person (Study 4; <ce:italic>N</ce:italic> = 177) committed by either more or less powerful perpetrators. Participants consistently experienced greater moral outrage and delivered more severe (anonymous) punishment to powerful perpetrators. Greater reactivity to powerful perpetrators was confined to the domain of morality and specific to the transgressor’s power, rather than their status. This work highlights the importance of social contextual factors like a perpetrators power within a hierarchy when studying moral judgment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104813\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104813","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代生活中,对权势人物丑闻的道德愤怒已经司空见惯。这些例子表明,道德上的愤怒可能不成比例地指向那些对他人有权力的人。然而,目前尚不清楚这种趋势是否仅仅反映了有权力的人犯下的不道德行为的发生率和突出程度更高,或者它是否表明有权力的肇事者更容易引起旁观者的愤怒。在一系列的研究中,我们调查了观察者的道德愤怒是否受到犯罪者在社会等级中的权力的影响。参与者阅读假设的场景(研究1,N = 481),回忆实际的违法行为(研究2,N = 351),目睹自私的经济行为(研究3,N = 1012),并观察由权力较大或较小的施暴者亲自实施的欺凌行为(研究4,N = 177)。参与者始终感受到更大的道德愤怒,并对有权势的肇事者给予更严厉的(匿名)惩罚。对强大的犯罪者的更大反应仅限于道德领域和特定于犯罪者的权力,而不是他们的地位。这项工作强调了社会背景因素的重要性,比如在研究道德判断时,等级制度中的犯罪者权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power as a moral magnifier: Moral outrage is amplified when the powerful transgress
Moral outrage in response to scandals involving powerful figures has become commonplace in modern life. These instances suggest that moral outrage may be disproportionately directed upward toward those with power over others. However, it remains unclear whether this tendency simply reflects the greater incidence and prominence of immoral acts committed by individuals with power or whether it indicates a deeper tendency for powerful perpetrators to elicit greater outrage in observers. In a series of studies, we investigated whether observers' moral outrage was influenced by a perpetrator's power within a social hierarchy. Participants read hypothetical scenarios (Study 1; N = 481), recalled actual transgressions (Study 2; N = 351), witnessed selfish economic behaviour (Study 3; N = 1012), and observed bullying in person (Study 4; N = 177) committed by either more or less powerful perpetrators. Participants consistently experienced greater moral outrage and delivered more severe (anonymous) punishment to powerful perpetrators. Greater reactivity to powerful perpetrators was confined to the domain of morality and specific to the transgressor’s power, rather than their status. This work highlights the importance of social contextual factors like a perpetrators power within a hierarchy when studying moral judgment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信