根据参与和非参与信号进行排名:来自行业的经验

IF 4.8 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Tom Cunningham, Sana Pandey, Leif Sigerson, Jonathan Stray, Jeff Allen, Bonnie Barrilleaux, Ravi Iyer, Mohit Kothari, Behnam Rezaei, Sanjay Kairam, Smitha Milli
{"title":"根据参与和非参与信号进行排名:来自行业的经验","authors":"Tom Cunningham,&nbsp;Sana Pandey,&nbsp;Leif Sigerson,&nbsp;Jonathan Stray,&nbsp;Jeff Allen,&nbsp;Bonnie Barrilleaux,&nbsp;Ravi Iyer,&nbsp;Mohit Kothari,&nbsp;Behnam Rezaei,&nbsp;Sanjay Kairam,&nbsp;Smitha Milli","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many online media platforms primarily rank items by predicted user engagement, yet we see substantial potential in incorporating non-engagement signals—such as user surveys or quality metrics—to benefit both platforms and society. Drawing on a daylong workshop with experts from various industry platforms and academia, we developed a series of propositions related to non-engagement signals that gained broad consensus. These propositions examine the relationships between engagement, non-engagement signals, and key metrics like user retention. We document each proposition with publicly available evidence, including quantitative results where possible. Given the cost and time associated with industry experimentation on non-engagement signals, we believe sharing these insights will be valuable for advancing common knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1551 1","pages":"19-32"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking by engagement and non-engagement signals: Learnings from industry\",\"authors\":\"Tom Cunningham,&nbsp;Sana Pandey,&nbsp;Leif Sigerson,&nbsp;Jonathan Stray,&nbsp;Jeff Allen,&nbsp;Bonnie Barrilleaux,&nbsp;Ravi Iyer,&nbsp;Mohit Kothari,&nbsp;Behnam Rezaei,&nbsp;Sanjay Kairam,&nbsp;Smitha Milli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nyas.15399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many online media platforms primarily rank items by predicted user engagement, yet we see substantial potential in incorporating non-engagement signals—such as user surveys or quality metrics—to benefit both platforms and society. Drawing on a daylong workshop with experts from various industry platforms and academia, we developed a series of propositions related to non-engagement signals that gained broad consensus. These propositions examine the relationships between engagement, non-engagement signals, and key metrics like user retention. We document each proposition with publicly available evidence, including quantitative results where possible. Given the cost and time associated with industry experimentation on non-engagement signals, we believe sharing these insights will be valuable for advancing common knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1551 1\",\"pages\":\"19-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15399\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多在线媒体平台主要根据预测的用户参与度对项目进行排名,但我们看到了整合非参与信号(如用户调查或质量指标)的巨大潜力,以使平台和社会都受益。通过与来自不同行业平台和学术界的专家进行为期一天的研讨会,我们提出了一系列与不参与信号相关的主张,并获得了广泛的共识。这些命题考察了用户粘性、非用户粘性信号和用户留存等关键指标之间的关系。我们用公开可用的证据记录每个命题,包括可能的定量结果。考虑到对非接触信号进行行业实验的成本和时间,我们相信分享这些见解对于推进常识将是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ranking by engagement and non-engagement signals: Learnings from industry

Ranking by engagement and non-engagement signals: Learnings from industry

Ranking by engagement and non-engagement signals: Learnings from industry

Ranking by engagement and non-engagement signals: Learnings from industry

Ranking by engagement and non-engagement signals: Learnings from industry

Many online media platforms primarily rank items by predicted user engagement, yet we see substantial potential in incorporating non-engagement signals—such as user surveys or quality metrics—to benefit both platforms and society. Drawing on a daylong workshop with experts from various industry platforms and academia, we developed a series of propositions related to non-engagement signals that gained broad consensus. These propositions examine the relationships between engagement, non-engagement signals, and key metrics like user retention. We document each proposition with publicly available evidence, including quantitative results where possible. Given the cost and time associated with industry experimentation on non-engagement signals, we believe sharing these insights will be valuable for advancing common knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信