Catherine Mary Dichmont, Natalie Anne Dowling, André Eric Punt, Sean Pascoe, Roy Aijun Deng, Ingrid van Putten, Jason Marc Cope
{"title":"帮助建立澳大利亚的库存评估能力:一个案例研究","authors":"Catherine Mary Dichmont, Natalie Anne Dowling, André Eric Punt, Sean Pascoe, Roy Aijun Deng, Ingrid van Putten, Jason Marc Cope","doi":"10.1111/faf.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fisheries stock assessment capacity faces resource constraints in many countries, including limited personnel, high workloads, and restricted funding. Stock assessment scientists often operate under short timelines, with outcomes that can influence livelihoods and receive public scrutiny. Scientists frequently manage multiple assessments each year, making time management a challenge. Consequently, finding opportunities to invest in professional development remains difficult within existing operational demands. We developed a series of approaches to invest in Australia's employed stock assessment capacity, and present these as a case study for other similar marine science fields and countries. The approaches led to critical insights to a way forward to develop a ‘Community of Practice’. We used network analyses to evaluate collaboration based on published Australian stock assessments and related papers. We then used surveys and interviews to understand the factors that have constrained stock assessment scientists in investing in their own development. Tools and opportunities were then made available: (a) a web site providing a central repository on freely available stock assessment packages and Australian stock assessment reports; (b) training courses on the use of assessment packages that were open to participants across organisations; and (c) a simulation game to learn in a ‘consequence free’ environment. This paper highlights what has been learnt and generalises these findings beyond the Australian stock assessment community's well‐being.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Helping to Build Stock Assessment Capacity in Australia: A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Mary Dichmont, Natalie Anne Dowling, André Eric Punt, Sean Pascoe, Roy Aijun Deng, Ingrid van Putten, Jason Marc Cope\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fisheries stock assessment capacity faces resource constraints in many countries, including limited personnel, high workloads, and restricted funding. Stock assessment scientists often operate under short timelines, with outcomes that can influence livelihoods and receive public scrutiny. Scientists frequently manage multiple assessments each year, making time management a challenge. Consequently, finding opportunities to invest in professional development remains difficult within existing operational demands. We developed a series of approaches to invest in Australia's employed stock assessment capacity, and present these as a case study for other similar marine science fields and countries. The approaches led to critical insights to a way forward to develop a ‘Community of Practice’. We used network analyses to evaluate collaboration based on published Australian stock assessments and related papers. We then used surveys and interviews to understand the factors that have constrained stock assessment scientists in investing in their own development. Tools and opportunities were then made available: (a) a web site providing a central repository on freely available stock assessment packages and Australian stock assessment reports; (b) training courses on the use of assessment packages that were open to participants across organisations; and (c) a simulation game to learn in a ‘consequence free’ environment. This paper highlights what has been learnt and generalises these findings beyond the Australian stock assessment community's well‐being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Helping to Build Stock Assessment Capacity in Australia: A Case Study
Fisheries stock assessment capacity faces resource constraints in many countries, including limited personnel, high workloads, and restricted funding. Stock assessment scientists often operate under short timelines, with outcomes that can influence livelihoods and receive public scrutiny. Scientists frequently manage multiple assessments each year, making time management a challenge. Consequently, finding opportunities to invest in professional development remains difficult within existing operational demands. We developed a series of approaches to invest in Australia's employed stock assessment capacity, and present these as a case study for other similar marine science fields and countries. The approaches led to critical insights to a way forward to develop a ‘Community of Practice’. We used network analyses to evaluate collaboration based on published Australian stock assessments and related papers. We then used surveys and interviews to understand the factors that have constrained stock assessment scientists in investing in their own development. Tools and opportunities were then made available: (a) a web site providing a central repository on freely available stock assessment packages and Australian stock assessment reports; (b) training courses on the use of assessment packages that were open to participants across organisations; and (c) a simulation game to learn in a ‘consequence free’ environment. This paper highlights what has been learnt and generalises these findings beyond the Australian stock assessment community's well‐being.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.