4.16 Ga阿波罗盆地撞击对南极-艾特肯盆地的类kreep岩性进行了改造

IF 14.3 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Jingyou Chen, Le Zhang, Zexian Cui, Zhiming Chen, Zhiyong Xiao, Fanglu Luo, Yuqi Qian, Yan-Qiang Zhang, Chengyuan Wang, Jintuan Wang, Qing Yang, Pengli He, Linli Chen, Fangfang Huang, Haiyang Xian, Katherine H. Joy, James W. Head, Clive R. Neal, Yi-Gang Xu
{"title":"4.16 Ga阿波罗盆地撞击对南极-艾特肯盆地的类kreep岩性进行了改造","authors":"Jingyou Chen, Le Zhang, Zexian Cui, Zhiming Chen, Zhiyong Xiao, Fanglu Luo, Yuqi Qian, Yan-Qiang Zhang, Chengyuan Wang, Jintuan Wang, Qing Yang, Pengli He, Linli Chen, Fangfang Huang, Haiyang Xian, Katherine H. Joy, James W. Head, Clive R. Neal, Yi-Gang Xu","doi":"10.1038/s41550-025-02640-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The early impact flux recorded by the Moon, especially the first billion years during the basin-forming epoch, is pivotal to understanding the evolution of inner Solar System bodies. However, our current understanding of this critical epoch is impeded by the lack of samples that have a clear provenance from specific ancient impact basins. Here we examine three impact-melt clasts in the Chang’e-6 lunar regolith collected from the Apollo basin within the gigantic South Pole–Aitken basin. We found that the impact-melt rocks, which have KREEP-like compositional signatures, probably originated from the differentiates of a South Pole–Aitken basin impact-melt sheet or pool, which were later reworked by the Apollo basin-forming event at ~4.16 Ga. This study suggests that the basin-forming epoch did not occur within the narrow timespan of ~3.8–4.0 Ga proposed for a cataclysmic late heavy bombardment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18778,"journal":{"name":"Nature Astronomy","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KREEP-like lithologies in the South Pole–Aitken basin reworked by the Apollo basin impact at 4.16 Ga\",\"authors\":\"Jingyou Chen, Le Zhang, Zexian Cui, Zhiming Chen, Zhiyong Xiao, Fanglu Luo, Yuqi Qian, Yan-Qiang Zhang, Chengyuan Wang, Jintuan Wang, Qing Yang, Pengli He, Linli Chen, Fangfang Huang, Haiyang Xian, Katherine H. Joy, James W. Head, Clive R. Neal, Yi-Gang Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41550-025-02640-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The early impact flux recorded by the Moon, especially the first billion years during the basin-forming epoch, is pivotal to understanding the evolution of inner Solar System bodies. However, our current understanding of this critical epoch is impeded by the lack of samples that have a clear provenance from specific ancient impact basins. Here we examine three impact-melt clasts in the Chang’e-6 lunar regolith collected from the Apollo basin within the gigantic South Pole–Aitken basin. We found that the impact-melt rocks, which have KREEP-like compositional signatures, probably originated from the differentiates of a South Pole–Aitken basin impact-melt sheet or pool, which were later reworked by the Apollo basin-forming event at ~4.16 Ga. This study suggests that the basin-forming epoch did not occur within the narrow timespan of ~3.8–4.0 Ga proposed for a cataclysmic late heavy bombardment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Astronomy\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Astronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-025-02640-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-025-02640-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

月球记录的早期撞击通量,特别是盆地形成时期的前10亿年,对于理解太阳系内部天体的演化至关重要。然而,我们目前对这一关键时期的理解受到缺乏来自特定古代撞击盆地的明确来源的样本的阻碍。在这里,我们研究了从巨大的南极-艾特肯盆地内的阿波罗盆地收集的嫦娥六号月球风化层中的三个撞击熔融碎屑。研究发现,具有kreep类成分特征的冲击熔体岩可能起源于南极-艾特肯盆地碰撞熔体板或池的分异,后来在~4.16 Ga的阿波罗盆地形成事件中被重新加工。研究表明,盆地形成时代并非发生在~3.8 ~ 4.0 Ga的狭窄时间范围内,这是一个灾难性的晚期重轰击期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

KREEP-like lithologies in the South Pole–Aitken basin reworked by the Apollo basin impact at 4.16 Ga

KREEP-like lithologies in the South Pole–Aitken basin reworked by the Apollo basin impact at 4.16 Ga

The early impact flux recorded by the Moon, especially the first billion years during the basin-forming epoch, is pivotal to understanding the evolution of inner Solar System bodies. However, our current understanding of this critical epoch is impeded by the lack of samples that have a clear provenance from specific ancient impact basins. Here we examine three impact-melt clasts in the Chang’e-6 lunar regolith collected from the Apollo basin within the gigantic South Pole–Aitken basin. We found that the impact-melt rocks, which have KREEP-like compositional signatures, probably originated from the differentiates of a South Pole–Aitken basin impact-melt sheet or pool, which were later reworked by the Apollo basin-forming event at ~4.16 Ga. This study suggests that the basin-forming epoch did not occur within the narrow timespan of ~3.8–4.0 Ga proposed for a cataclysmic late heavy bombardment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Astronomy
Nature Astronomy Physics and Astronomy-Astronomy and Astrophysics
CiteScore
19.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Nature Astronomy, the oldest science, has played a significant role in the history of Nature. Throughout the years, pioneering discoveries such as the first quasar, exoplanet, and understanding of spiral nebulae have been reported in the journal. With the introduction of Nature Astronomy, the field now receives expanded coverage, welcoming research in astronomy, astrophysics, and planetary science. The primary objective is to encourage closer collaboration among researchers in these related areas. Similar to other journals under the Nature brand, Nature Astronomy boasts a devoted team of professional editors, ensuring fairness and rigorous peer-review processes. The journal maintains high standards in copy-editing and production, ensuring timely publication and editorial independence. In addition to original research, Nature Astronomy publishes a wide range of content, including Comments, Reviews, News and Views, Features, and Correspondence. This diverse collection covers various disciplines within astronomy and includes contributions from a diverse range of voices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信