{"title":"职业轨迹中的社会不平等:职业如何塑造社会群体之间不平等的任务分配","authors":"Andrea Wessendorf , Rasmus Pichler","doi":"10.1016/j.jvb.2025.104173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent studies suggest that day-to-day task allocation is an important driver of inequality between social groups in the workplace. In this conceptual paper, we explore how occupations influence task allocation in a way that fosters social inequality. We develop a framework that links task allocation to differences in career trajectories between practitioners of the same job. In particular, the framework explains how the tasks, stereotypes, and prestige associated with an occupation systematically influence task allocation in the workplace. We argue that occupational imprints lead to typical (atypical) practitioners of an occupation being allocated relatively more core (peripheral) tasks, and explain how this mechanism shapes practitioners' career progression (vs. stagnation or exit). This paper extends current theory on social inequality by theorizing the influence of occupations on an underexplored mechanism of inequality, namely task allocation in the workplace.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 104173"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social inequality in career trajectories: How occupations shape unequal task allocation between social groups\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Wessendorf , Rasmus Pichler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvb.2025.104173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent studies suggest that day-to-day task allocation is an important driver of inequality between social groups in the workplace. In this conceptual paper, we explore how occupations influence task allocation in a way that fosters social inequality. We develop a framework that links task allocation to differences in career trajectories between practitioners of the same job. In particular, the framework explains how the tasks, stereotypes, and prestige associated with an occupation systematically influence task allocation in the workplace. We argue that occupational imprints lead to typical (atypical) practitioners of an occupation being allocated relatively more core (peripheral) tasks, and explain how this mechanism shapes practitioners' career progression (vs. stagnation or exit). This paper extends current theory on social inequality by theorizing the influence of occupations on an underexplored mechanism of inequality, namely task allocation in the workplace.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vocational Behavior\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vocational Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879125000922\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879125000922","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Social inequality in career trajectories: How occupations shape unequal task allocation between social groups
Recent studies suggest that day-to-day task allocation is an important driver of inequality between social groups in the workplace. In this conceptual paper, we explore how occupations influence task allocation in a way that fosters social inequality. We develop a framework that links task allocation to differences in career trajectories between practitioners of the same job. In particular, the framework explains how the tasks, stereotypes, and prestige associated with an occupation systematically influence task allocation in the workplace. We argue that occupational imprints lead to typical (atypical) practitioners of an occupation being allocated relatively more core (peripheral) tasks, and explain how this mechanism shapes practitioners' career progression (vs. stagnation or exit). This paper extends current theory on social inequality by theorizing the influence of occupations on an underexplored mechanism of inequality, namely task allocation in the workplace.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vocational Behavior publishes original empirical and theoretical articles offering unique insights into the realms of career choice, career development, and work adjustment across the lifespan. These contributions are not only valuable for academic exploration but also find applications in counseling and career development programs across diverse sectors such as colleges, universities, business, industry, government, and the military.
The primary focus of the journal centers on individual decision-making regarding work and careers, prioritizing investigations into personal career choices rather than organizational or employer-level variables. Example topics encompass a broad range, from initial career choices (e.g., choice of major, initial work or organization selection, organizational attraction) to the development of a career, work transitions, work-family management, and attitudes within the workplace (such as work commitment, multiple role management, and turnover).