Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero, Carlos Pérez-López, Nuria Caballol, Mariateresa Buongiorno, María Asunción Ávila Rivera, Núria López Ariztegui, Lydia López-Manzanares, Jorge Hernández-Vara, Àngels Bayes-Rusiñol, Alexandre Gironell Carreró, María Álvarez Saúco, Elisabet Franquet Gomez, David A. Pérez-Martínez, Sonia Escalante Arroyo, Silvia Martí-Martínez, Pablo Mir, José Mª Salom Juan, Juan Carlos Martínez-Castrillo, Cristian Tebé
{"title":"基于可穿戴设备信息的帕金森病药物调整与其他方法的比较:随机临床试验","authors":"Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero, Carlos Pérez-López, Nuria Caballol, Mariateresa Buongiorno, María Asunción Ávila Rivera, Núria López Ariztegui, Lydia López-Manzanares, Jorge Hernández-Vara, Àngels Bayes-Rusiñol, Alexandre Gironell Carreró, María Álvarez Saúco, Elisabet Franquet Gomez, David A. Pérez-Martínez, Sonia Escalante Arroyo, Silvia Martí-Martínez, Pablo Mir, José Mª Salom Juan, Juan Carlos Martínez-Castrillo, Cristian Tebé","doi":"10.1038/s41531-025-00977-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by motor fluctuations, with alternating periods of good (“ON”) and poor (“OFF”) motor function. Monitoring these fluctuations is crucial for optimizing treatment, yet traditional methods rely on subjective patient reports. This multicenter, single-blind, cluster-randomized trial evaluated the effectiveness of three monitoring approaches in real-world clinical practice. Neurologists from 35 centers were randomized into three groups: one using clinical visit data alone, another incorporating Hauser diary entries, and a third integrating Parkinson’s Holter (STAT-ON®) reports. A total of 156 patients were recruited. Changes in ‘OFF time’ from baseline to 26 weeks were minimal and non-significant across groups. Secondary outcomes, including ‘ON time,’ dyskinesia, and quality-of-life scores, showed no significant differences. These findings suggest that the choice of motor fluctuation monitoring method may not significantly impact clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for a broader understanding of how these monitoring tools are integrated and utilized in real-world settings. Trial registration: NCT04176302 (November 21, 2019 - ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":19706,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parkinson’s disease medication adjustments based on wearable device information compared to other methods: randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero, Carlos Pérez-López, Nuria Caballol, Mariateresa Buongiorno, María Asunción Ávila Rivera, Núria López Ariztegui, Lydia López-Manzanares, Jorge Hernández-Vara, Àngels Bayes-Rusiñol, Alexandre Gironell Carreró, María Álvarez Saúco, Elisabet Franquet Gomez, David A. Pérez-Martínez, Sonia Escalante Arroyo, Silvia Martí-Martínez, Pablo Mir, José Mª Salom Juan, Juan Carlos Martínez-Castrillo, Cristian Tebé\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41531-025-00977-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by motor fluctuations, with alternating periods of good (“ON”) and poor (“OFF”) motor function. Monitoring these fluctuations is crucial for optimizing treatment, yet traditional methods rely on subjective patient reports. This multicenter, single-blind, cluster-randomized trial evaluated the effectiveness of three monitoring approaches in real-world clinical practice. Neurologists from 35 centers were randomized into three groups: one using clinical visit data alone, another incorporating Hauser diary entries, and a third integrating Parkinson’s Holter (STAT-ON®) reports. A total of 156 patients were recruited. Changes in ‘OFF time’ from baseline to 26 weeks were minimal and non-significant across groups. Secondary outcomes, including ‘ON time,’ dyskinesia, and quality-of-life scores, showed no significant differences. These findings suggest that the choice of motor fluctuation monitoring method may not significantly impact clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for a broader understanding of how these monitoring tools are integrated and utilized in real-world settings. Trial registration: NCT04176302 (November 21, 2019 - ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-00977-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-00977-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parkinson’s disease medication adjustments based on wearable device information compared to other methods: randomized clinical trial
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by motor fluctuations, with alternating periods of good (“ON”) and poor (“OFF”) motor function. Monitoring these fluctuations is crucial for optimizing treatment, yet traditional methods rely on subjective patient reports. This multicenter, single-blind, cluster-randomized trial evaluated the effectiveness of three monitoring approaches in real-world clinical practice. Neurologists from 35 centers were randomized into three groups: one using clinical visit data alone, another incorporating Hauser diary entries, and a third integrating Parkinson’s Holter (STAT-ON®) reports. A total of 156 patients were recruited. Changes in ‘OFF time’ from baseline to 26 weeks were minimal and non-significant across groups. Secondary outcomes, including ‘ON time,’ dyskinesia, and quality-of-life scores, showed no significant differences. These findings suggest that the choice of motor fluctuation monitoring method may not significantly impact clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for a broader understanding of how these monitoring tools are integrated and utilized in real-world settings. Trial registration: NCT04176302 (November 21, 2019 - ClinicalTrials.gov).
期刊介绍:
npj Parkinson's Disease is a comprehensive open access journal that covers a wide range of research areas related to Parkinson's disease. It publishes original studies in basic science, translational research, and clinical investigations. The journal is dedicated to advancing our understanding of Parkinson's disease by exploring various aspects such as anatomy, etiology, genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, neurophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic development. By providing free and immediate access to the scientific and Parkinson's disease community, npj Parkinson's Disease promotes collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers and healthcare professionals.