基于可穿戴设备信息的帕金森病药物调整与其他方法的比较:随机临床试验

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero, Carlos Pérez-López, Nuria Caballol, Mariateresa Buongiorno, María Asunción Ávila Rivera, Núria López Ariztegui, Lydia López-Manzanares, Jorge Hernández-Vara, Àngels Bayes-Rusiñol, Alexandre Gironell Carreró, María Álvarez Saúco, Elisabet Franquet Gomez, David A. Pérez-Martínez, Sonia Escalante Arroyo, Silvia Martí-Martínez, Pablo Mir, José Mª Salom Juan, Juan Carlos Martínez-Castrillo, Cristian Tebé
{"title":"基于可穿戴设备信息的帕金森病药物调整与其他方法的比较:随机临床试验","authors":"Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero, Carlos Pérez-López, Nuria Caballol, Mariateresa Buongiorno, María Asunción Ávila Rivera, Núria López Ariztegui, Lydia López-Manzanares, Jorge Hernández-Vara, Àngels Bayes-Rusiñol, Alexandre Gironell Carreró, María Álvarez Saúco, Elisabet Franquet Gomez, David A. Pérez-Martínez, Sonia Escalante Arroyo, Silvia Martí-Martínez, Pablo Mir, José Mª Salom Juan, Juan Carlos Martínez-Castrillo, Cristian Tebé","doi":"10.1038/s41531-025-00977-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by motor fluctuations, with alternating periods of good (“ON”) and poor (“OFF”) motor function. Monitoring these fluctuations is crucial for optimizing treatment, yet traditional methods rely on subjective patient reports. This multicenter, single-blind, cluster-randomized trial evaluated the effectiveness of three monitoring approaches in real-world clinical practice. Neurologists from 35 centers were randomized into three groups: one using clinical visit data alone, another incorporating Hauser diary entries, and a third integrating Parkinson’s Holter (STAT-ON®) reports. A total of 156 patients were recruited. Changes in ‘OFF time’ from baseline to 26 weeks were minimal and non-significant across groups. Secondary outcomes, including ‘ON time,’ dyskinesia, and quality-of-life scores, showed no significant differences. These findings suggest that the choice of motor fluctuation monitoring method may not significantly impact clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for a broader understanding of how these monitoring tools are integrated and utilized in real-world settings. Trial registration: NCT04176302 (November 21, 2019 - ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":19706,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parkinson’s disease medication adjustments based on wearable device information compared to other methods: randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Rodríguez-Molinero, Carlos Pérez-López, Nuria Caballol, Mariateresa Buongiorno, María Asunción Ávila Rivera, Núria López Ariztegui, Lydia López-Manzanares, Jorge Hernández-Vara, Àngels Bayes-Rusiñol, Alexandre Gironell Carreró, María Álvarez Saúco, Elisabet Franquet Gomez, David A. Pérez-Martínez, Sonia Escalante Arroyo, Silvia Martí-Martínez, Pablo Mir, José Mª Salom Juan, Juan Carlos Martínez-Castrillo, Cristian Tebé\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41531-025-00977-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by motor fluctuations, with alternating periods of good (“ON”) and poor (“OFF”) motor function. Monitoring these fluctuations is crucial for optimizing treatment, yet traditional methods rely on subjective patient reports. This multicenter, single-blind, cluster-randomized trial evaluated the effectiveness of three monitoring approaches in real-world clinical practice. Neurologists from 35 centers were randomized into three groups: one using clinical visit data alone, another incorporating Hauser diary entries, and a third integrating Parkinson’s Holter (STAT-ON®) reports. A total of 156 patients were recruited. Changes in ‘OFF time’ from baseline to 26 weeks were minimal and non-significant across groups. Secondary outcomes, including ‘ON time,’ dyskinesia, and quality-of-life scores, showed no significant differences. These findings suggest that the choice of motor fluctuation monitoring method may not significantly impact clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for a broader understanding of how these monitoring tools are integrated and utilized in real-world settings. Trial registration: NCT04176302 (November 21, 2019 - ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-00977-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-00977-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

帕金森病(PD)的特征是运动波动,运动功能良好(“ON”)和较差(“OFF”)交替出现。监测这些波动对于优化治疗至关重要,但传统方法依赖于患者的主观报告。这项多中心、单盲、集群随机试验评估了三种监测方法在现实世界临床实践中的有效性。来自35个中心的神经科医生被随机分为三组:一组仅使用临床访问数据,另一组结合豪瑟日记条目,第三组结合帕金森霍尔特(STAT-ON®)报告。总共招募了156名患者。从基线到26周的“OFF时间”变化很小,各组间无显著性变化。次要结果,包括“准时”、运动障碍和生活质量评分,没有显着差异。这些发现表明,运动波动监测方法的选择可能不会显著影响临床结果,强调需要更广泛地了解这些监测工具如何在现实环境中整合和利用。试验注册:NCT04176302(2019年11月21日- ClinicalTrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Parkinson’s disease medication adjustments based on wearable device information compared to other methods: randomized clinical trial

Parkinson’s disease medication adjustments based on wearable device information compared to other methods: randomized clinical trial

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by motor fluctuations, with alternating periods of good (“ON”) and poor (“OFF”) motor function. Monitoring these fluctuations is crucial for optimizing treatment, yet traditional methods rely on subjective patient reports. This multicenter, single-blind, cluster-randomized trial evaluated the effectiveness of three monitoring approaches in real-world clinical practice. Neurologists from 35 centers were randomized into three groups: one using clinical visit data alone, another incorporating Hauser diary entries, and a third integrating Parkinson’s Holter (STAT-ON®) reports. A total of 156 patients were recruited. Changes in ‘OFF time’ from baseline to 26 weeks were minimal and non-significant across groups. Secondary outcomes, including ‘ON time,’ dyskinesia, and quality-of-life scores, showed no significant differences. These findings suggest that the choice of motor fluctuation monitoring method may not significantly impact clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for a broader understanding of how these monitoring tools are integrated and utilized in real-world settings. Trial registration: NCT04176302 (November 21, 2019 - ClinicalTrials.gov).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Parkinson's Disease
NPJ Parkinson's Disease Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
156
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Parkinson's Disease is a comprehensive open access journal that covers a wide range of research areas related to Parkinson's disease. It publishes original studies in basic science, translational research, and clinical investigations. The journal is dedicated to advancing our understanding of Parkinson's disease by exploring various aspects such as anatomy, etiology, genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, neurophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic development. By providing free and immediate access to the scientific and Parkinson's disease community, npj Parkinson's Disease promotes collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers and healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信