Mariano Sanz, Cecilie Gjerde, Bjørn Tore Gjertsen, Alberto Ortiz‐Vigón, Nerea Sanchez, Alain Hoornaert, Jordi Caballe‐Serrano, Maria Giralt‐Hernando, Frederick Gaultier, Nicoleta Reinald, Else Marie Pinholt, Markus Rojewski, Helen Rouard, Nathalie Chevallier, Samih Mohamed‐Ahmed, Xieqi Shi, Tie‐Jun Shi, Hubert Schrezenmeier, Pierre Layrolle, Kamal Mustafa
{"title":"间充质干细胞合成骨替代物用于萎缩牙槽嵴骨增强:一项随机对照临床试验","authors":"Mariano Sanz, Cecilie Gjerde, Bjørn Tore Gjertsen, Alberto Ortiz‐Vigón, Nerea Sanchez, Alain Hoornaert, Jordi Caballe‐Serrano, Maria Giralt‐Hernando, Frederick Gaultier, Nicoleta Reinald, Else Marie Pinholt, Markus Rojewski, Helen Rouard, Nathalie Chevallier, Samih Mohamed‐Ahmed, Xieqi Shi, Tie‐Jun Shi, Hubert Schrezenmeier, Pierre Layrolle, Kamal Mustafa","doi":"10.1111/clr.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of a cell‐based therapy for 3D bone augmentation of severe alveolar bone defects prior to dental implant placement.Materials and MethodsA Phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of a cell therapy using expanded autologous iliac crest‐derived mesenchymal cells seeded on a synthetic bioabsorbable bone substitute covered with a non‐resorbable membrane. The control group received an autogenous bone block graft. After 5 months, CBCT scans were compared to measure the bone volume changes achieved after the regenerative surgery. Subsequently, dental implants were placed in the regenerated areas.ResultsA total of 48 patients were included and randomized (36 patients in the test group and 12 in the control group). However, seven patients did not reach the minimum required number of expanded MSCs and were therefore unable to be treated. The tested intervention demonstrated significantly greater gains in bone volume, with a mean difference of 480.01 mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.032). Similarly, the mean change in bone crest volume from baseline to 5 months was notably higher in the test group (1066.91 mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>) compared to the control group (586.9 mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>). Adverse reactions and patient morbidity were minor in both groups. Implants were placed on the regenerated bone, and all were integrated successfully in both groups.ConclusionsThe cell‐based therapy resulted in significant changes in bone volume compared to the control treatment, enabling dental implants in all patients. The procedure was associated with minimal adverse effects and patient morbidity.Trial Registration<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" xlink:href=\"http://clinicaltrials.gov\">ClinicalTrials.gov</jats:ext-link>: NCT03373052, NCT04297813","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone Augmentation of Atrophic Alveolar Ridges Using a Synthetic Bone Substitute With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Mariano Sanz, Cecilie Gjerde, Bjørn Tore Gjertsen, Alberto Ortiz‐Vigón, Nerea Sanchez, Alain Hoornaert, Jordi Caballe‐Serrano, Maria Giralt‐Hernando, Frederick Gaultier, Nicoleta Reinald, Else Marie Pinholt, Markus Rojewski, Helen Rouard, Nathalie Chevallier, Samih Mohamed‐Ahmed, Xieqi Shi, Tie‐Jun Shi, Hubert Schrezenmeier, Pierre Layrolle, Kamal Mustafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of a cell‐based therapy for 3D bone augmentation of severe alveolar bone defects prior to dental implant placement.Materials and MethodsA Phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of a cell therapy using expanded autologous iliac crest‐derived mesenchymal cells seeded on a synthetic bioabsorbable bone substitute covered with a non‐resorbable membrane. The control group received an autogenous bone block graft. After 5 months, CBCT scans were compared to measure the bone volume changes achieved after the regenerative surgery. Subsequently, dental implants were placed in the regenerated areas.ResultsA total of 48 patients were included and randomized (36 patients in the test group and 12 in the control group). However, seven patients did not reach the minimum required number of expanded MSCs and were therefore unable to be treated. The tested intervention demonstrated significantly greater gains in bone volume, with a mean difference of 480.01 mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup> (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.032). Similarly, the mean change in bone crest volume from baseline to 5 months was notably higher in the test group (1066.91 mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>) compared to the control group (586.9 mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>). Adverse reactions and patient morbidity were minor in both groups. Implants were placed on the regenerated bone, and all were integrated successfully in both groups.ConclusionsThe cell‐based therapy resulted in significant changes in bone volume compared to the control treatment, enabling dental implants in all patients. The procedure was associated with minimal adverse effects and patient morbidity.Trial Registration<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\" xlink:href=\\\"http://clinicaltrials.gov\\\">ClinicalTrials.gov</jats:ext-link>: NCT03373052, NCT04297813\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone Augmentation of Atrophic Alveolar Ridges Using a Synthetic Bone Substitute With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of a cell‐based therapy for 3D bone augmentation of severe alveolar bone defects prior to dental implant placement.Materials and MethodsA Phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of a cell therapy using expanded autologous iliac crest‐derived mesenchymal cells seeded on a synthetic bioabsorbable bone substitute covered with a non‐resorbable membrane. The control group received an autogenous bone block graft. After 5 months, CBCT scans were compared to measure the bone volume changes achieved after the regenerative surgery. Subsequently, dental implants were placed in the regenerated areas.ResultsA total of 48 patients were included and randomized (36 patients in the test group and 12 in the control group). However, seven patients did not reach the minimum required number of expanded MSCs and were therefore unable to be treated. The tested intervention demonstrated significantly greater gains in bone volume, with a mean difference of 480.01 mm3 (p = 0.032). Similarly, the mean change in bone crest volume from baseline to 5 months was notably higher in the test group (1066.91 mm3) compared to the control group (586.9 mm3). Adverse reactions and patient morbidity were minor in both groups. Implants were placed on the regenerated bone, and all were integrated successfully in both groups.ConclusionsThe cell‐based therapy resulted in significant changes in bone volume compared to the control treatment, enabling dental implants in all patients. The procedure was associated with minimal adverse effects and patient morbidity.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03373052, NCT04297813
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.