Sanjana Ballal, Mohammad Sakir, Kunal R. Chandekar, Sameer Rastogi, Madhav P. Yadav, Frank Roesch, Madhavi Tripathi, Marcel Martin, Chandrasekhar Bal
{"title":"[177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu。(FAPi)2在肉瘤患者中的治疗","authors":"Sanjana Ballal, Mohammad Sakir, Kunal R. Chandekar, Sameer Rastogi, Madhav P. Yadav, Frank Roesch, Madhavi Tripathi, Marcel Martin, Chandrasekhar Bal","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.125.270186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)<sub>2</sub> therapy in patients with sarcoma, a cohort of individuals with limited treatment options and significant disease burden. <strong>Methods:</strong> This retrospective analysis involved 10 patients with histologically confirmed sarcoma. Patients received a median cumulative activity of 17.5 GBq (range, 6.3–55.5 GBq) of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)<sub>2</sub> administered over a median of 3 treatment cycles (range, 1–6 cycles). Patient responses were assessed using PERCIST in 6 patients and RECIST 1.1 in 9 patients. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate, defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease, evaluated through morphologic, molecular, or clinical criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. <strong>Results:</strong> [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)<sub>2</sub> was generally well tolerated. Response assessment using PERCIST indicated a partial response in 33.3% of patients, whereas no objective response was observed in the response assessed with RECIST. Disease control rates were 50% and 22.3% with PERCIST and RECIST, respectively. Disease progression was documented in 7 patients, 3 of whom succumbed to disease-related complications. The median progression-free survival was approximately 5 mo (95% CI, 2.9–7.1 mo), and the median overall survival was 8 mo (95% CI, 5.5–10.5 mo). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)<sub>2</sub> demonstrated clinical antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with sarcoma. Further studies with larger cohorts and combination therapies are warranted to optimize therapeutic efficacy and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"jnumed.125.270186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)2 Therapy in Patients with Sarcoma\",\"authors\":\"Sanjana Ballal, Mohammad Sakir, Kunal R. Chandekar, Sameer Rastogi, Madhav P. Yadav, Frank Roesch, Madhavi Tripathi, Marcel Martin, Chandrasekhar Bal\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.125.270186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)<sub>2</sub> therapy in patients with sarcoma, a cohort of individuals with limited treatment options and significant disease burden. <strong>Methods:</strong> This retrospective analysis involved 10 patients with histologically confirmed sarcoma. Patients received a median cumulative activity of 17.5 GBq (range, 6.3–55.5 GBq) of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)<sub>2</sub> administered over a median of 3 treatment cycles (range, 1–6 cycles). Patient responses were assessed using PERCIST in 6 patients and RECIST 1.1 in 9 patients. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate, defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease, evaluated through morphologic, molecular, or clinical criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. <strong>Results:</strong> [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)<sub>2</sub> was generally well tolerated. Response assessment using PERCIST indicated a partial response in 33.3% of patients, whereas no objective response was observed in the response assessed with RECIST. Disease control rates were 50% and 22.3% with PERCIST and RECIST, respectively. Disease progression was documented in 7 patients, 3 of whom succumbed to disease-related complications. The median progression-free survival was approximately 5 mo (95% CI, 2.9–7.1 mo), and the median overall survival was 8 mo (95% CI, 5.5–10.5 mo). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)<sub>2</sub> demonstrated clinical antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with sarcoma. Further studies with larger cohorts and combination therapies are warranted to optimize therapeutic efficacy and improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"jnumed.125.270186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.270186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.270186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and Safety of [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)2 Therapy in Patients with Sarcoma
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)2 therapy in patients with sarcoma, a cohort of individuals with limited treatment options and significant disease burden. Methods: This retrospective analysis involved 10 patients with histologically confirmed sarcoma. Patients received a median cumulative activity of 17.5 GBq (range, 6.3–55.5 GBq) of [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)2 administered over a median of 3 treatment cycles (range, 1–6 cycles). Patient responses were assessed using PERCIST in 6 patients and RECIST 1.1 in 9 patients. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate, defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease, evaluated through morphologic, molecular, or clinical criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Results: [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)2 was generally well tolerated. Response assessment using PERCIST indicated a partial response in 33.3% of patients, whereas no objective response was observed in the response assessed with RECIST. Disease control rates were 50% and 22.3% with PERCIST and RECIST, respectively. Disease progression was documented in 7 patients, 3 of whom succumbed to disease-related complications. The median progression-free survival was approximately 5 mo (95% CI, 2.9–7.1 mo), and the median overall survival was 8 mo (95% CI, 5.5–10.5 mo). Conclusion: [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.Glu.(FAPi)2 demonstrated clinical antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with sarcoma. Further studies with larger cohorts and combination therapies are warranted to optimize therapeutic efficacy and improve outcomes.