预测尿路感染的机器学习算法:人口统计数据和测油尺反射结果的整合

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Julien Favresse, Julien Cabo, Maxime Bosse, Benjamin Lardinois, Julie Cadrobbi, Kim Laffineur, Marc Elsen, Jonathan Douxfils, Liam Roelandts, Sander De Bruyne
{"title":"预测尿路感染的机器学习算法:人口统计数据和测油尺反射结果的整合","authors":"Julien Favresse, Julien Cabo, Maxime Bosse, Benjamin Lardinois, Julie Cadrobbi, Kim Laffineur, Marc Elsen, Jonathan Douxfils, Liam Roelandts, Sander De Bruyne","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections encountered in healthcare settings. Current diagnostic practices often require 24–48 h due to the time needed for culture results. Given that 70%–80% of cultures return negative, there is significant interest in rapidly identifying negative samples to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. This study aimed to develop and evaluate 6 machine learning models to predict UTIs. Methods Urine samples from 22 961 patients, collected between September 28, 2023 and June 29, 2024, were analyzed. Six machine learning models were assessed for their ability to predict UTIs based on 5 definitions incorporating pyuria and culture outcomes. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set (70%, n = 16 072) and an independent test set (30%, n = 6889). Seventeen predictive parameters, including dipstick reflectance results and demographic variables, were evaluated. Results The CatBoost Classifier emerged as the best-performing model, achieving an area under the ROC curve of 92.0%–94.7% depending on the UTI definition, with a negative predictive value consistently exceeding 95%, and an average precision ranging from 68.2% to 81.6%. In comparison, the predictive performance of nitrite and/or leukocyte esterase was significantly lower. Conclusion Machine learning models, particularly the CatBoost Classifier, demonstrate high accuracy and offer a promising tool to aid clinicians in UTI diagnosis. Unlike traditional culture methods, these models deliver results within an hour. Further external validation with an independent dataset and prospective studies assessing the impact on antibiotic prescribing practices is recommended.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Urinary Tract Infections: Integration of Demographic Data and Dipstick Reflectance Results\",\"authors\":\"Julien Favresse, Julien Cabo, Maxime Bosse, Benjamin Lardinois, Julie Cadrobbi, Kim Laffineur, Marc Elsen, Jonathan Douxfils, Liam Roelandts, Sander De Bruyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections encountered in healthcare settings. Current diagnostic practices often require 24–48 h due to the time needed for culture results. Given that 70%–80% of cultures return negative, there is significant interest in rapidly identifying negative samples to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. This study aimed to develop and evaluate 6 machine learning models to predict UTIs. Methods Urine samples from 22 961 patients, collected between September 28, 2023 and June 29, 2024, were analyzed. Six machine learning models were assessed for their ability to predict UTIs based on 5 definitions incorporating pyuria and culture outcomes. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set (70%, n = 16 072) and an independent test set (30%, n = 6889). Seventeen predictive parameters, including dipstick reflectance results and demographic variables, were evaluated. Results The CatBoost Classifier emerged as the best-performing model, achieving an area under the ROC curve of 92.0%–94.7% depending on the UTI definition, with a negative predictive value consistently exceeding 95%, and an average precision ranging from 68.2% to 81.6%. In comparison, the predictive performance of nitrite and/or leukocyte esterase was significantly lower. Conclusion Machine learning models, particularly the CatBoost Classifier, demonstrate high accuracy and offer a promising tool to aid clinicians in UTI diagnosis. Unlike traditional culture methods, these models deliver results within an hour. Further external validation with an independent dataset and prospective studies assessing the impact on antibiotic prescribing practices is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尿路感染(uti)是医疗机构中最常见的感染之一。由于培养结果需要时间,目前的诊断方法通常需要24-48小时。鉴于70%-80%的培养结果为阴性,人们对快速识别阴性样本以减少不必要的抗生素使用非常感兴趣。本研究旨在开发和评估6种机器学习模型来预测uti。方法对2023年9月28日至2024年6月29日采集的22 961例患者尿液进行分析。基于包含脓尿和培养结果的5种定义,评估了6种机器学习模型预测尿路感染的能力。数据集随机分为训练集(70%,n = 16072)和独立测试集(30%,n = 6889)。评估了17个预测参数,包括油尺反射率结果和人口统计学变量。结果CatBoost Classifier是表现最好的模型,根据UTI定义,其ROC曲线下面积为92.0% ~ 94.7%,负预测值始终超过95%,平均准确率为68.2% ~ 81.6%。相比之下,亚硝酸盐和/或白细胞酯酶的预测性能明显较低。机器学习模型,特别是CatBoost分类器,具有很高的准确性,为临床医生诊断UTI提供了一个很有前途的工具。与传统的培养方法不同,这些模型在一小时内就能产生结果。建议使用独立数据集和前瞻性研究进一步进行外部验证,评估对抗生素处方实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Urinary Tract Infections: Integration of Demographic Data and Dipstick Reflectance Results
Background Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infections encountered in healthcare settings. Current diagnostic practices often require 24–48 h due to the time needed for culture results. Given that 70%–80% of cultures return negative, there is significant interest in rapidly identifying negative samples to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. This study aimed to develop and evaluate 6 machine learning models to predict UTIs. Methods Urine samples from 22 961 patients, collected between September 28, 2023 and June 29, 2024, were analyzed. Six machine learning models were assessed for their ability to predict UTIs based on 5 definitions incorporating pyuria and culture outcomes. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set (70%, n = 16 072) and an independent test set (30%, n = 6889). Seventeen predictive parameters, including dipstick reflectance results and demographic variables, were evaluated. Results The CatBoost Classifier emerged as the best-performing model, achieving an area under the ROC curve of 92.0%–94.7% depending on the UTI definition, with a negative predictive value consistently exceeding 95%, and an average precision ranging from 68.2% to 81.6%. In comparison, the predictive performance of nitrite and/or leukocyte esterase was significantly lower. Conclusion Machine learning models, particularly the CatBoost Classifier, demonstrate high accuracy and offer a promising tool to aid clinicians in UTI diagnosis. Unlike traditional culture methods, these models deliver results within an hour. Further external validation with an independent dataset and prospective studies assessing the impact on antibiotic prescribing practices is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信