Marcos Penhacek, Rodrigo Antônio Castro-Souza, Geiziane Tessarolo, José Alexandre Diniz-Filho, Thadeu Sobral-Souza, Domingos de Jesus Rodrigues
{"title":"亚马逊地区两栖动物取样的偏差:使用基础设施和可访问性数据来识别抽样差距","authors":"Marcos Penhacek, Rodrigo Antônio Castro-Souza, Geiziane Tessarolo, José Alexandre Diniz-Filho, Thadeu Sobral-Souza, Domingos de Jesus Rodrigues","doi":"10.1111/btp.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biogeographic knowledge of Amazonian amphibians is limited by spatial and temporal coverage, resulting in biases that affect the understanding of their diversity patterns. This study analyzed a database of 951 species based on 213,072 georeferenced occurrence records distributed across 24,319 locations in the Amazon. The objective was to identify sampling biases related to infrastructure and accessibility predictors. The overall results indicate that rivers are the primary drivers of amphibian sampling, while roads had a limited influence, reflecting the historical reliance of the region on river transport. Regarding infrastructure, both cities and hydroelectric plants had a moderate effect on sampling, whereas transmission lines had a negligible effect. However, with the expansion of hydroelectric projects from the mid-1970s onwards, intensifying after 2008 with the Brazilian government's Growth Acceleration Plan (PAC), the high volume of records obtained from these ventures distorted the sampling pattern, overestimating rivers and hydroelectric plants while underestimating highways as a source of sampling bias. We conclude, therefore, that amphibian sampling in the Amazon exhibits significant geographic and temporal bias due to unevenly distributed research efforts, which are largely constrained by logistical challenges and inadequate infrastructure. To overcome these challenges, it is necessary to promote collaboration between researchers and decision-makers, invest in research infrastructure, and improve data dissemination. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of conducting a rigorous preliminary evaluation of datasets, particularly when a substantial volume of data are rapidly generated by infrastructure projects such as hydroelectric power plants, to prevent analytical biases and ensure accurate results. These measures aim to strengthen amphibian research and support biodiversity conservation, particularly in response to increasing deforestation and climate change in the Amazon.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"57 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biases in Amphibian Sampling in the Amazon: Using Infrastructure and Accessibility Data to Identify Sampling Gaps\",\"authors\":\"Marcos Penhacek, Rodrigo Antônio Castro-Souza, Geiziane Tessarolo, José Alexandre Diniz-Filho, Thadeu Sobral-Souza, Domingos de Jesus Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/btp.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Biogeographic knowledge of Amazonian amphibians is limited by spatial and temporal coverage, resulting in biases that affect the understanding of their diversity patterns. This study analyzed a database of 951 species based on 213,072 georeferenced occurrence records distributed across 24,319 locations in the Amazon. The objective was to identify sampling biases related to infrastructure and accessibility predictors. The overall results indicate that rivers are the primary drivers of amphibian sampling, while roads had a limited influence, reflecting the historical reliance of the region on river transport. Regarding infrastructure, both cities and hydroelectric plants had a moderate effect on sampling, whereas transmission lines had a negligible effect. However, with the expansion of hydroelectric projects from the mid-1970s onwards, intensifying after 2008 with the Brazilian government's Growth Acceleration Plan (PAC), the high volume of records obtained from these ventures distorted the sampling pattern, overestimating rivers and hydroelectric plants while underestimating highways as a source of sampling bias. We conclude, therefore, that amphibian sampling in the Amazon exhibits significant geographic and temporal bias due to unevenly distributed research efforts, which are largely constrained by logistical challenges and inadequate infrastructure. To overcome these challenges, it is necessary to promote collaboration between researchers and decision-makers, invest in research infrastructure, and improve data dissemination. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of conducting a rigorous preliminary evaluation of datasets, particularly when a substantial volume of data are rapidly generated by infrastructure projects such as hydroelectric power plants, to prevent analytical biases and ensure accurate results. These measures aim to strengthen amphibian research and support biodiversity conservation, particularly in response to increasing deforestation and climate change in the Amazon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotropica\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotropica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70079\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biases in Amphibian Sampling in the Amazon: Using Infrastructure and Accessibility Data to Identify Sampling Gaps
Biogeographic knowledge of Amazonian amphibians is limited by spatial and temporal coverage, resulting in biases that affect the understanding of their diversity patterns. This study analyzed a database of 951 species based on 213,072 georeferenced occurrence records distributed across 24,319 locations in the Amazon. The objective was to identify sampling biases related to infrastructure and accessibility predictors. The overall results indicate that rivers are the primary drivers of amphibian sampling, while roads had a limited influence, reflecting the historical reliance of the region on river transport. Regarding infrastructure, both cities and hydroelectric plants had a moderate effect on sampling, whereas transmission lines had a negligible effect. However, with the expansion of hydroelectric projects from the mid-1970s onwards, intensifying after 2008 with the Brazilian government's Growth Acceleration Plan (PAC), the high volume of records obtained from these ventures distorted the sampling pattern, overestimating rivers and hydroelectric plants while underestimating highways as a source of sampling bias. We conclude, therefore, that amphibian sampling in the Amazon exhibits significant geographic and temporal bias due to unevenly distributed research efforts, which are largely constrained by logistical challenges and inadequate infrastructure. To overcome these challenges, it is necessary to promote collaboration between researchers and decision-makers, invest in research infrastructure, and improve data dissemination. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of conducting a rigorous preliminary evaluation of datasets, particularly when a substantial volume of data are rapidly generated by infrastructure projects such as hydroelectric power plants, to prevent analytical biases and ensure accurate results. These measures aim to strengthen amphibian research and support biodiversity conservation, particularly in response to increasing deforestation and climate change in the Amazon.
期刊介绍:
Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.