{"title":"更多的批评,更少的提及政客,以及罕见的政党违规:美国立法者被删除的推文与公开发布的推文的比较","authors":"Siyuan Ma , Junyi Han , Wanrong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Politicians nowadays - especially elected legislators - need their social media accounts to better construct their public image. They deliberately delete or keep their tweets publicly available to maximize their desired public image. The current study first provided a qualitative description of all 116th U.S. federal-level legislators tweeting and deleting time sequences from January 3rd, 2019, to September 30th, 2020. The current study then used logistic regression to analyze a random sample combining the deleted tweets (N = 328) and publicly available tweets (N = 808). Results show that legislators are more likely to maintain a professional but party-oriented public image on social media. The current study also finds that: 1) legislators seldom post tweets related to false information and party-violating information; 2) legislators are more likely to delete tweets that have mentioned private life or other specific politicians; 3) legislators are more likely to keep the criticism tweets publicly available. Besides, Representatives are more likely to delete tweets than Senators. These findings indicate that legislators do deliberately manage a public image, containing a clear party affiliation, a critical and non-private concentration, and a good reputation for reliable information and respecting colleagues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 108776"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More criticisms, less mention of politicians, and rare party violations: A comparison of deleted tweets and publicly available tweets of U.S. legislators\",\"authors\":\"Siyuan Ma , Junyi Han , Wanrong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Politicians nowadays - especially elected legislators - need their social media accounts to better construct their public image. They deliberately delete or keep their tweets publicly available to maximize their desired public image. The current study first provided a qualitative description of all 116th U.S. federal-level legislators tweeting and deleting time sequences from January 3rd, 2019, to September 30th, 2020. The current study then used logistic regression to analyze a random sample combining the deleted tweets (N = 328) and publicly available tweets (N = 808). Results show that legislators are more likely to maintain a professional but party-oriented public image on social media. The current study also finds that: 1) legislators seldom post tweets related to false information and party-violating information; 2) legislators are more likely to delete tweets that have mentioned private life or other specific politicians; 3) legislators are more likely to keep the criticism tweets publicly available. Besides, Representatives are more likely to delete tweets than Senators. These findings indicate that legislators do deliberately manage a public image, containing a clear party affiliation, a critical and non-private concentration, and a good reputation for reliable information and respecting colleagues.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225002237\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225002237","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
More criticisms, less mention of politicians, and rare party violations: A comparison of deleted tweets and publicly available tweets of U.S. legislators
Politicians nowadays - especially elected legislators - need their social media accounts to better construct their public image. They deliberately delete or keep their tweets publicly available to maximize their desired public image. The current study first provided a qualitative description of all 116th U.S. federal-level legislators tweeting and deleting time sequences from January 3rd, 2019, to September 30th, 2020. The current study then used logistic regression to analyze a random sample combining the deleted tweets (N = 328) and publicly available tweets (N = 808). Results show that legislators are more likely to maintain a professional but party-oriented public image on social media. The current study also finds that: 1) legislators seldom post tweets related to false information and party-violating information; 2) legislators are more likely to delete tweets that have mentioned private life or other specific politicians; 3) legislators are more likely to keep the criticism tweets publicly available. Besides, Representatives are more likely to delete tweets than Senators. These findings indicate that legislators do deliberately manage a public image, containing a clear party affiliation, a critical and non-private concentration, and a good reputation for reliable information and respecting colleagues.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.