2000年至2024年间澳大利亚墨尔本和悉尼的空气污染超标事件

IF 3.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Simon William Mkasimongwa , Stephen J. Livesley , Robert G. Ryan , Robyn Schofield
{"title":"2000年至2024年间澳大利亚墨尔本和悉尼的空气污染超标事件","authors":"Simon William Mkasimongwa ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Livesley ,&nbsp;Robert G. Ryan ,&nbsp;Robyn Schofield","doi":"10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Air pollution events pose significant challenges to public health in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia’s most populous cities. This study evaluates publicly available data to understand the frequency of air pollution exceedance events beyond World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, as well as national and state standards. The air quality of both cities generally complies with national standards but consistently fails to meet WHO air quality guidelines. Since 2000, Sydney recorded single-pollutant events on 43% of monitored days and multi-pollutant events on 14% of monitored days. In Melbourne, single-pollutant events were recorded on 42% of monitored days, and multi-pollutant events on 8%. In Sydney, NO<sub>2</sub> exceeded WHO guidelines on 52% of monitored days, PM<sub>2.5</sub> on 13%, PM<sub>10</sub> on 4%, and O<sub>3</sub> on 6%. In Melbourne, NO<sub>2</sub> exceeded on 47% of monitored days, PM<sub>2.5</sub> on 4%, PM<sub>10</sub> on 6%, and O<sub>3</sub> on 2%. Evaluating long-term, city-scale air quality is challenging due to significant variations in spatial and temporal data coverage, especially in Melbourne. Many monitoring stations have limited temporal coverage and do not consistently monitor all key pollutants, meaning the true extent of air pollution is likely not fully captured. Since 2017, Melbourne has had only five active monitoring stations, compared to over 15 in Sydney. This study demonstrates the urgent need for expanded air pollution monitoring networks in Australia’s largest cities and highlights the need for ongoing research into the impacts of multi- as well as single-pollutant exceedance events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52395,"journal":{"name":"City and Environment Interactions","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Air pollution exceedance events in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia, between 2000 and 2024\",\"authors\":\"Simon William Mkasimongwa ,&nbsp;Stephen J. Livesley ,&nbsp;Robert G. Ryan ,&nbsp;Robyn Schofield\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Air pollution events pose significant challenges to public health in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia’s most populous cities. This study evaluates publicly available data to understand the frequency of air pollution exceedance events beyond World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, as well as national and state standards. The air quality of both cities generally complies with national standards but consistently fails to meet WHO air quality guidelines. Since 2000, Sydney recorded single-pollutant events on 43% of monitored days and multi-pollutant events on 14% of monitored days. In Melbourne, single-pollutant events were recorded on 42% of monitored days, and multi-pollutant events on 8%. In Sydney, NO<sub>2</sub> exceeded WHO guidelines on 52% of monitored days, PM<sub>2.5</sub> on 13%, PM<sub>10</sub> on 4%, and O<sub>3</sub> on 6%. In Melbourne, NO<sub>2</sub> exceeded on 47% of monitored days, PM<sub>2.5</sub> on 4%, PM<sub>10</sub> on 6%, and O<sub>3</sub> on 2%. Evaluating long-term, city-scale air quality is challenging due to significant variations in spatial and temporal data coverage, especially in Melbourne. Many monitoring stations have limited temporal coverage and do not consistently monitor all key pollutants, meaning the true extent of air pollution is likely not fully captured. Since 2017, Melbourne has had only five active monitoring stations, compared to over 15 in Sydney. This study demonstrates the urgent need for expanded air pollution monitoring networks in Australia’s largest cities and highlights the need for ongoing research into the impacts of multi- as well as single-pollutant exceedance events.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"City and Environment Interactions\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"City and Environment Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252025000534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City and Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590252025000534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在澳大利亚人口最多的城市墨尔本和悉尼,空气污染事件对公众健康构成了重大挑战。本研究评估了公开可用的数据,以了解超出世界卫生组织(WHO)准则以及国家和州标准的空气污染超标事件的频率。这两个城市的空气质量总体上符合国家标准,但始终未能达到世卫组织的空气质量准则。自2000年以来,悉尼记录的单一污染物事件占监测天数的43%,多污染物事件占监测天数的14%。在墨尔本,42%的监测天数记录了单一污染物事件,8%的监测天数记录了多重污染物事件。在悉尼,有52%的监测天数二氧化氮超标,PM2.5超标13%,PM10超标4%,O3超标6%。在墨尔本,二氧化氮超标天数占监测天数的47%,PM2.5超标天数占4%,PM10超标天数占6%,臭氧超标天数占2%。由于空间和时间数据覆盖范围的显着变化,特别是在墨尔本,评估长期城市尺度的空气质量具有挑战性。许多监测站的时间覆盖范围有限,并没有持续监测所有主要污染物,这意味着可能无法完全捕捉到空气污染的真实程度。自2017年以来,墨尔本只有5个活跃监测站,而悉尼有超过15个。这项研究表明,迫切需要在澳大利亚最大的城市扩大空气污染监测网络,并强调需要对多种和单一污染物超标事件的影响进行持续研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Air pollution exceedance events in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia, between 2000 and 2024
Air pollution events pose significant challenges to public health in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia’s most populous cities. This study evaluates publicly available data to understand the frequency of air pollution exceedance events beyond World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, as well as national and state standards. The air quality of both cities generally complies with national standards but consistently fails to meet WHO air quality guidelines. Since 2000, Sydney recorded single-pollutant events on 43% of monitored days and multi-pollutant events on 14% of monitored days. In Melbourne, single-pollutant events were recorded on 42% of monitored days, and multi-pollutant events on 8%. In Sydney, NO2 exceeded WHO guidelines on 52% of monitored days, PM2.5 on 13%, PM10 on 4%, and O3 on 6%. In Melbourne, NO2 exceeded on 47% of monitored days, PM2.5 on 4%, PM10 on 6%, and O3 on 2%. Evaluating long-term, city-scale air quality is challenging due to significant variations in spatial and temporal data coverage, especially in Melbourne. Many monitoring stations have limited temporal coverage and do not consistently monitor all key pollutants, meaning the true extent of air pollution is likely not fully captured. Since 2017, Melbourne has had only five active monitoring stations, compared to over 15 in Sydney. This study demonstrates the urgent need for expanded air pollution monitoring networks in Australia’s largest cities and highlights the need for ongoing research into the impacts of multi- as well as single-pollutant exceedance events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
City and Environment Interactions
City and Environment Interactions Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
27 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信