标准药剂师使用转介病人出院后药剂师审查诊所

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Adrienne Kostellar , Michael Barras , Ian Coombes , Andrew Hale , Carla Scuderi , Neil Cottrell , Nazanin Falconer
{"title":"标准药剂师使用转介病人出院后药剂师审查诊所","authors":"Adrienne Kostellar ,&nbsp;Michael Barras ,&nbsp;Ian Coombes ,&nbsp;Andrew Hale ,&nbsp;Carla Scuderi ,&nbsp;Neil Cottrell ,&nbsp;Nazanin Falconer","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The transition from hospital discharge to primary care is a critical period in a patient's healthcare journey. Health system errors occur, due to a breakdown in communication or lack of structured planning which can lead to medication related harm or hospital readmission. At a quaternary referral hospital in Australia, pharmacists refer Internal Medicine patients to a pharmacist-led clinic for post-discharge medication review. While clinical resources exist to guide identification of at-risk patients, it remains unclear if and to what extent, pharmacists incorporate these criteria into their referral.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the criteria and reasons used by pharmacists to refer Internal Medicine patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists who had worked in Internal Medicine and previously referred patients to the post discharge review clinic. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was obtained. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and coded using NVivo®. Themes and subthemes were identified through inductive thematic analysis and finalised via discussion within the research team.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven pharmacists were interviewed. Five themes emerged describing referral criteria and reasons: (1) medication criteria including the use of high-risk medications and adjustments; (2) patient criteria including health status, frailty and social aspects of health including carer supports; (3) system pressures including patient flow and time constraints in care delivery; (4) post-discharge care including medication liaison and evaluation of tolerability and; (5) clinical judgement described as “worry” about the patient, highlighting the role of clinical reasoning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pharmacists used established criteria from clinical resources to identify high-risk patients for referral; however, they also relied on clinical judgement. Referrals aimed to prevent medication related harm and improve communication with patients and healthcare providers. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of clinical judgement to ensure high-risk patients are identified for transition of care services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100647"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criteria pharmacists use to refer patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic\",\"authors\":\"Adrienne Kostellar ,&nbsp;Michael Barras ,&nbsp;Ian Coombes ,&nbsp;Andrew Hale ,&nbsp;Carla Scuderi ,&nbsp;Neil Cottrell ,&nbsp;Nazanin Falconer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The transition from hospital discharge to primary care is a critical period in a patient's healthcare journey. Health system errors occur, due to a breakdown in communication or lack of structured planning which can lead to medication related harm or hospital readmission. At a quaternary referral hospital in Australia, pharmacists refer Internal Medicine patients to a pharmacist-led clinic for post-discharge medication review. While clinical resources exist to guide identification of at-risk patients, it remains unclear if and to what extent, pharmacists incorporate these criteria into their referral.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the criteria and reasons used by pharmacists to refer Internal Medicine patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists who had worked in Internal Medicine and previously referred patients to the post discharge review clinic. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was obtained. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and coded using NVivo®. Themes and subthemes were identified through inductive thematic analysis and finalised via discussion within the research team.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven pharmacists were interviewed. Five themes emerged describing referral criteria and reasons: (1) medication criteria including the use of high-risk medications and adjustments; (2) patient criteria including health status, frailty and social aspects of health including carer supports; (3) system pressures including patient flow and time constraints in care delivery; (4) post-discharge care including medication liaison and evaluation of tolerability and; (5) clinical judgement described as “worry” about the patient, highlighting the role of clinical reasoning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pharmacists used established criteria from clinical resources to identify high-risk patients for referral; however, they also relied on clinical judgement. Referrals aimed to prevent medication related harm and improve communication with patients and healthcare providers. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of clinical judgement to ensure high-risk patients are identified for transition of care services.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从出院到初级保健的过渡是患者医疗保健旅程中的关键时期。由于沟通中断或缺乏结构化规划,可能导致与药物有关的伤害或再次住院,从而发生卫生系统错误。在澳大利亚的一家四级转诊医院,药剂师将内科患者转介到药剂师领导的诊所进行出院后药物审查。虽然存在临床资源来指导识别高危患者,但尚不清楚药剂师是否以及在多大程度上将这些标准纳入其转诊。目的确定药师将内科患者转介至出院后药师复查门诊的标准和原因。方法采用半结构化访谈法,对曾在内科工作过的医院药师和以前转介到出院复查门诊的患者进行访谈。访谈一直进行到数据饱和为止。使用NVivo®对访谈进行录音、转录和编码。主题和副主题通过归纳主题分析确定,并通过研究团队内部的讨论最终确定。结果6名受访药师。出现了五个主题,描述了转诊标准和原因:(1)用药标准,包括高危药物的使用和调整;(2)患者标准,包括健康状况、虚弱和健康的社会方面,包括照顾者的支持;(3)系统压力,包括患者流量和护理服务的时间限制;(4)出院后护理,包括药物联络和耐受性评估;(5)临床判断描述为“担心”患者,突出临床推理的作用。结论药师使用临床资源中建立的标准识别高危患者进行转诊;然而,他们也依赖于临床判断。转诊旨在预防药物相关伤害,并改善与患者和医疗保健提供者的沟通。未来的研究应评估临床判断的有效性,以确保高危患者被识别并转移护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criteria pharmacists use to refer patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic

Background

The transition from hospital discharge to primary care is a critical period in a patient's healthcare journey. Health system errors occur, due to a breakdown in communication or lack of structured planning which can lead to medication related harm or hospital readmission. At a quaternary referral hospital in Australia, pharmacists refer Internal Medicine patients to a pharmacist-led clinic for post-discharge medication review. While clinical resources exist to guide identification of at-risk patients, it remains unclear if and to what extent, pharmacists incorporate these criteria into their referral.

Aim

To determine the criteria and reasons used by pharmacists to refer Internal Medicine patients to a post discharge pharmacist review clinic.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists who had worked in Internal Medicine and previously referred patients to the post discharge review clinic. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was obtained. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and coded using NVivo®. Themes and subthemes were identified through inductive thematic analysis and finalised via discussion within the research team.

Results

Eleven pharmacists were interviewed. Five themes emerged describing referral criteria and reasons: (1) medication criteria including the use of high-risk medications and adjustments; (2) patient criteria including health status, frailty and social aspects of health including carer supports; (3) system pressures including patient flow and time constraints in care delivery; (4) post-discharge care including medication liaison and evaluation of tolerability and; (5) clinical judgement described as “worry” about the patient, highlighting the role of clinical reasoning.

Conclusion

Pharmacists used established criteria from clinical resources to identify high-risk patients for referral; however, they also relied on clinical judgement. Referrals aimed to prevent medication related harm and improve communication with patients and healthcare providers. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of clinical judgement to ensure high-risk patients are identified for transition of care services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信