{"title":"亲密关系的推与拉:父母虐待儿童史阴影下的二元亲子亲密关系","authors":"Ada Talmon , Giora Ashkenazi , Yael Hollander , Noga Tsur","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parental history of child maltreatment (CM) may affect perceived parent-child closeness. However, past research often examines this from either the parent's or child's perspective alone. This study uses an intimacy framework to explore the dyadic nature of perceived closeness in parent-child relationships involving CM.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We examine the links between CM exposure and three outcomes: perceived parental intimacy with young adults, offspring's perceived intimacy with parents, and perception discrepancies. We also explore posttraumatic stress PTS, disturbances in self-organization DSO, anxious attachment, and avoidant attachment as potential underlying mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>452 parent-offspring dyads completed self-reported questionnaires assessing CM, CPTSD symptoms (PTS and DSO), attachment, and intimacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CM had mixed effects on intimacy perceptions. For parents, CM was linked to lower perceived intimacy via PTS (indirect effect = −0.48; p < 0.05) but higher via DSO (indirect effect = 0.09; p < 0.01). For offspring, CM was positively associated with perceived intimacy via DSO (indirect effect = 0.077; p < 0.05) but negatively through avoidant attachment (indirect effect = −0.087; p < 0.01). Regarding intimacy discrepancy, parental CM was negatively associated through PTS (indirect effect = −0.049; p < 0.01) and positively through anxious attachment (indirect effect = 0.029; p < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest CM history influences parent-child intimacy via complex paths, with PTS and DSO having opposite effects. Attachment styles are key mediators in these cross-generational processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 107648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The push and pull of closeness: Dyadic parent-offspring intimacy in the shadow of parental history of child maltreatment\",\"authors\":\"Ada Talmon , Giora Ashkenazi , Yael Hollander , Noga Tsur\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Parental history of child maltreatment (CM) may affect perceived parent-child closeness. However, past research often examines this from either the parent's or child's perspective alone. This study uses an intimacy framework to explore the dyadic nature of perceived closeness in parent-child relationships involving CM.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We examine the links between CM exposure and three outcomes: perceived parental intimacy with young adults, offspring's perceived intimacy with parents, and perception discrepancies. We also explore posttraumatic stress PTS, disturbances in self-organization DSO, anxious attachment, and avoidant attachment as potential underlying mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>452 parent-offspring dyads completed self-reported questionnaires assessing CM, CPTSD symptoms (PTS and DSO), attachment, and intimacy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CM had mixed effects on intimacy perceptions. For parents, CM was linked to lower perceived intimacy via PTS (indirect effect = −0.48; p < 0.05) but higher via DSO (indirect effect = 0.09; p < 0.01). For offspring, CM was positively associated with perceived intimacy via DSO (indirect effect = 0.077; p < 0.05) but negatively through avoidant attachment (indirect effect = −0.087; p < 0.01). Regarding intimacy discrepancy, parental CM was negatively associated through PTS (indirect effect = −0.049; p < 0.01) and positively through anxious attachment (indirect effect = 0.029; p < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest CM history influences parent-child intimacy via complex paths, with PTS and DSO having opposite effects. Attachment styles are key mediators in these cross-generational processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425004041\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213425004041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The push and pull of closeness: Dyadic parent-offspring intimacy in the shadow of parental history of child maltreatment
Background
Parental history of child maltreatment (CM) may affect perceived parent-child closeness. However, past research often examines this from either the parent's or child's perspective alone. This study uses an intimacy framework to explore the dyadic nature of perceived closeness in parent-child relationships involving CM.
Objective
We examine the links between CM exposure and three outcomes: perceived parental intimacy with young adults, offspring's perceived intimacy with parents, and perception discrepancies. We also explore posttraumatic stress PTS, disturbances in self-organization DSO, anxious attachment, and avoidant attachment as potential underlying mechanisms.
Methods
452 parent-offspring dyads completed self-reported questionnaires assessing CM, CPTSD symptoms (PTS and DSO), attachment, and intimacy.
Results
CM had mixed effects on intimacy perceptions. For parents, CM was linked to lower perceived intimacy via PTS (indirect effect = −0.48; p < 0.05) but higher via DSO (indirect effect = 0.09; p < 0.01). For offspring, CM was positively associated with perceived intimacy via DSO (indirect effect = 0.077; p < 0.05) but negatively through avoidant attachment (indirect effect = −0.087; p < 0.01). Regarding intimacy discrepancy, parental CM was negatively associated through PTS (indirect effect = −0.049; p < 0.01) and positively through anxious attachment (indirect effect = 0.029; p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest CM history influences parent-child intimacy via complex paths, with PTS and DSO having opposite effects. Attachment styles are key mediators in these cross-generational processes.
期刊介绍:
Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.