Mina Kim , Lori Pennington-Gray , Tammi L. Richardson
{"title":"是什么推动了水上娱乐爱好者的公众支持和政治消费主义行为?以南卡罗来纳州为例","authors":"Mina Kim , Lori Pennington-Gray , Tammi L. Richardson","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2025.100940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water recreationists have a unique connection to water quality, given their direct interaction with aquatic environments during leisure pursuits. Growing concerns about water quality have prompted a body of research focused on understanding how environmental conditions and risk perceptions influence environmental attitudes and conservation behaviors. Yet, the question remains—do water-based recreationists act beyond activity-specific conservation behaviors? To address this gap, this study examines whether water-based recreationists in South Carolina support stricter water management policies and participate in political consumerism behaviors (boycotting and buycotting). We collected data through survey questionnaires and employed multiple and logistic regressions for data analysis. The results showed that risk perceptions are a key driver of all three conservation behaviors. Furthermore, age appeared to be positively related to their support for water management policies, while negatively associated with boycotting and buycotting behaviors. Our findings contribute to identifying the drivers of these underexplored conservation behaviors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100940"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What drives public support and political consumerism behaviors among water-based recreationists? The case of South Carolina\",\"authors\":\"Mina Kim , Lori Pennington-Gray , Tammi L. Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jort.2025.100940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Water recreationists have a unique connection to water quality, given their direct interaction with aquatic environments during leisure pursuits. Growing concerns about water quality have prompted a body of research focused on understanding how environmental conditions and risk perceptions influence environmental attitudes and conservation behaviors. Yet, the question remains—do water-based recreationists act beyond activity-specific conservation behaviors? To address this gap, this study examines whether water-based recreationists in South Carolina support stricter water management policies and participate in political consumerism behaviors (boycotting and buycotting). We collected data through survey questionnaires and employed multiple and logistic regressions for data analysis. The results showed that risk perceptions are a key driver of all three conservation behaviors. Furthermore, age appeared to be positively related to their support for water management policies, while negatively associated with boycotting and buycotting behaviors. Our findings contribute to identifying the drivers of these underexplored conservation behaviors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100940\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078025000866\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078025000866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
What drives public support and political consumerism behaviors among water-based recreationists? The case of South Carolina
Water recreationists have a unique connection to water quality, given their direct interaction with aquatic environments during leisure pursuits. Growing concerns about water quality have prompted a body of research focused on understanding how environmental conditions and risk perceptions influence environmental attitudes and conservation behaviors. Yet, the question remains—do water-based recreationists act beyond activity-specific conservation behaviors? To address this gap, this study examines whether water-based recreationists in South Carolina support stricter water management policies and participate in political consumerism behaviors (boycotting and buycotting). We collected data through survey questionnaires and employed multiple and logistic regressions for data analysis. The results showed that risk perceptions are a key driver of all three conservation behaviors. Furthermore, age appeared to be positively related to their support for water management policies, while negatively associated with boycotting and buycotting behaviors. Our findings contribute to identifying the drivers of these underexplored conservation behaviors.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.