心理治疗微过程的系统回顾和综合框架:将心理干预科学与即时实践的艺术联系起来

IF 12.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Xiaochen Luo , Alytia A. Levendosky
{"title":"心理治疗微过程的系统回顾和综合框架:将心理干预科学与即时实践的艺术联系起来","authors":"Xiaochen Luo ,&nbsp;Alytia A. Levendosky","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite advancements in psychotherapy research on effectiveness and critical therapy processes, there remains a significant gap between the science and the art of psychotherapy, specifically on how to understand what to do moment-to-moment with each patient. A burgeoning research literature addresses this question by examining psychotherapy microprocesses, which typically referred to within-session changes of therapy processes, aiming to bridge psychotherapy research with clinical practice. In this pre-registered systematic review, we reviewed 86 empirical quantitative studies examining observational psychotherapy microprocesses over 35 years. We extracted 28 microprocess constructs across six categories (affective/emotional, behavioral, cognitive, relational/interpersonal, linguistic, and movement), four key methodological features of operationalizing microprocesses, and three types of research questions that focused on within-session change patterns, dyadic and intra-personal momentary associations, and associations with outcomes/macroprocesses/predictors. The literature demonstrated unique advantages in embracing theoretical plurality, real-world settings, and dyadic influences, while being limited by theoretical and methodological challenges such as the scatteredness in construct operationalizations, limited inclusion of diverse samples/therapy modalities and culture-related constructs, disconnections from theoretically driven hypotheses, and a lack of standard in reporting methodological features. To address these challenges, we propose the Multilevel Integrative Microprocess Model (MIMM), an integrative framework that situates microprocesses within the broader context of psychotherapy research traditionally centered on macro-level processes and outcomes. We conclude by suggesting a future research agenda that provides a checklist for future microprocess studies to enhance theoretical coherence and methodological rigor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102641"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and integrative framework of psychotherapy microprocess: Linking the science of psychological interventions with the art of moment-to-moment practice\",\"authors\":\"Xiaochen Luo ,&nbsp;Alytia A. Levendosky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite advancements in psychotherapy research on effectiveness and critical therapy processes, there remains a significant gap between the science and the art of psychotherapy, specifically on how to understand what to do moment-to-moment with each patient. A burgeoning research literature addresses this question by examining psychotherapy microprocesses, which typically referred to within-session changes of therapy processes, aiming to bridge psychotherapy research with clinical practice. In this pre-registered systematic review, we reviewed 86 empirical quantitative studies examining observational psychotherapy microprocesses over 35 years. We extracted 28 microprocess constructs across six categories (affective/emotional, behavioral, cognitive, relational/interpersonal, linguistic, and movement), four key methodological features of operationalizing microprocesses, and three types of research questions that focused on within-session change patterns, dyadic and intra-personal momentary associations, and associations with outcomes/macroprocesses/predictors. The literature demonstrated unique advantages in embracing theoretical plurality, real-world settings, and dyadic influences, while being limited by theoretical and methodological challenges such as the scatteredness in construct operationalizations, limited inclusion of diverse samples/therapy modalities and culture-related constructs, disconnections from theoretically driven hypotheses, and a lack of standard in reporting methodological features. To address these challenges, we propose the Multilevel Integrative Microprocess Model (MIMM), an integrative framework that situates microprocesses within the broader context of psychotherapy research traditionally centered on macro-level processes and outcomes. We conclude by suggesting a future research agenda that provides a checklist for future microprocess studies to enhance theoretical coherence and methodological rigor.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825001084\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825001084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管心理治疗在有效性和关键治疗过程方面的研究取得了进展,但在心理治疗的科学和艺术之间仍然存在着巨大的差距,特别是在如何理解如何对每个病人进行实时治疗方面。一个新兴的研究文献通过研究心理治疗的微过程来解决这个问题,微过程通常指的是治疗过程的内部变化,旨在将心理治疗研究与临床实践联系起来。在这篇预先注册的系统综述中,我们回顾了35年来86项实证定量研究,研究了观察性心理治疗微过程。我们提取了28个微过程结构,涉及6个类别(情感/情绪、行为、认知、关系/人际、语言和运动),操作微过程的4个关键方法论特征,以及关注会话内变化模式、二元和个人内部瞬间关联以及与结果/宏观过程/预测因子的关联的3种研究问题。文献在拥抱理论多元性、现实环境和二元影响方面显示出独特的优势,同时也受到理论和方法挑战的限制,如构建操作化的分散性、不同样本/治疗方式和文化相关构建的有限包含、与理论驱动假设的脱节以及报告方法特征缺乏标准。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了多层次整合微过程模型(Multilevel Integrative Microprocess Model, MIMM),这是一个整合框架,将微过程置于传统上以宏观层面的过程和结果为中心的心理治疗研究的更广泛背景下。最后,我们提出了一个未来的研究议程,为未来的微过程研究提供了一个清单,以增强理论的一致性和方法的严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review and integrative framework of psychotherapy microprocess: Linking the science of psychological interventions with the art of moment-to-moment practice
Despite advancements in psychotherapy research on effectiveness and critical therapy processes, there remains a significant gap between the science and the art of psychotherapy, specifically on how to understand what to do moment-to-moment with each patient. A burgeoning research literature addresses this question by examining psychotherapy microprocesses, which typically referred to within-session changes of therapy processes, aiming to bridge psychotherapy research with clinical practice. In this pre-registered systematic review, we reviewed 86 empirical quantitative studies examining observational psychotherapy microprocesses over 35 years. We extracted 28 microprocess constructs across six categories (affective/emotional, behavioral, cognitive, relational/interpersonal, linguistic, and movement), four key methodological features of operationalizing microprocesses, and three types of research questions that focused on within-session change patterns, dyadic and intra-personal momentary associations, and associations with outcomes/macroprocesses/predictors. The literature demonstrated unique advantages in embracing theoretical plurality, real-world settings, and dyadic influences, while being limited by theoretical and methodological challenges such as the scatteredness in construct operationalizations, limited inclusion of diverse samples/therapy modalities and culture-related constructs, disconnections from theoretically driven hypotheses, and a lack of standard in reporting methodological features. To address these challenges, we propose the Multilevel Integrative Microprocess Model (MIMM), an integrative framework that situates microprocesses within the broader context of psychotherapy research traditionally centered on macro-level processes and outcomes. We conclude by suggesting a future research agenda that provides a checklist for future microprocess studies to enhance theoretical coherence and methodological rigor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信