{"title":"垂直方向对潮间带移植珊瑚光生理健康、生长、形态和存活的影响","authors":"Yan Zhi YAP, Annie Ann Nee CHEW, Peter A. TODD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coral transplantation on coastal defence structures is an emerging ecological engineering strategy. While past research has focused on transplant suitability and survivability, there is limited knowledge on optimizing seawall designs to accommodate coral transplants. This study investigates the effects of three orientations (horizontal 0°, sloping 45°, and vertical 90°) on the photo-physiological health, growth, morphology and survival of <em>Dipsastraea</em> cf. <em>lizardensis</em>, <em>Platygyra</em> spp. and <em>Porites lutea</em> transplanted intertidally at 0.5–0.6 m above chart datum (CD). After 4.5 mo post transplantation, mortality, growth, coral morphometrics, photosynthetic efficiency (F<sub>v</sub>/Fm), total Symbiodiniaceae, and total chlorophyll <em>a</em> were recorded. Results indicate that transplants at 0° grew significantly less and had significantly lower Symbiodiniaceae density and chlorophyll <em>a</em> per cm<sup>2</sup> as compared to corals transplanted at 45° and 90°. Our findings indicate that <em>Dipsastraea</em> cf. <em>lizardensis</em> and <em>Platygyra</em> spp. are potential candidates for transplantation at 0.5–0.6 m above CD, but not <em>P</em><em>orites</em> <em>lutea</em> due to high mortality<em>.</em> Future seawalls that are designed to incorporate coral transplants should consider including attachment surfaces angled at 45°or 90°.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 107775"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of vertical orientation on the photo-physiological health, growth, morphology and survival of intertidally transplanted corals\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zhi YAP, Annie Ann Nee CHEW, Peter A. TODD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Coral transplantation on coastal defence structures is an emerging ecological engineering strategy. While past research has focused on transplant suitability and survivability, there is limited knowledge on optimizing seawall designs to accommodate coral transplants. This study investigates the effects of three orientations (horizontal 0°, sloping 45°, and vertical 90°) on the photo-physiological health, growth, morphology and survival of <em>Dipsastraea</em> cf. <em>lizardensis</em>, <em>Platygyra</em> spp. and <em>Porites lutea</em> transplanted intertidally at 0.5–0.6 m above chart datum (CD). After 4.5 mo post transplantation, mortality, growth, coral morphometrics, photosynthetic efficiency (F<sub>v</sub>/Fm), total Symbiodiniaceae, and total chlorophyll <em>a</em> were recorded. Results indicate that transplants at 0° grew significantly less and had significantly lower Symbiodiniaceae density and chlorophyll <em>a</em> per cm<sup>2</sup> as compared to corals transplanted at 45° and 90°. Our findings indicate that <em>Dipsastraea</em> cf. <em>lizardensis</em> and <em>Platygyra</em> spp. are potential candidates for transplantation at 0.5–0.6 m above CD, but not <em>P</em><em>orites</em> <em>lutea</em> due to high mortality<em>.</em> Future seawalls that are designed to incorporate coral transplants should consider including attachment surfaces angled at 45°or 90°.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425002654\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425002654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of vertical orientation on the photo-physiological health, growth, morphology and survival of intertidally transplanted corals
Coral transplantation on coastal defence structures is an emerging ecological engineering strategy. While past research has focused on transplant suitability and survivability, there is limited knowledge on optimizing seawall designs to accommodate coral transplants. This study investigates the effects of three orientations (horizontal 0°, sloping 45°, and vertical 90°) on the photo-physiological health, growth, morphology and survival of Dipsastraea cf. lizardensis, Platygyra spp. and Porites lutea transplanted intertidally at 0.5–0.6 m above chart datum (CD). After 4.5 mo post transplantation, mortality, growth, coral morphometrics, photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm), total Symbiodiniaceae, and total chlorophyll a were recorded. Results indicate that transplants at 0° grew significantly less and had significantly lower Symbiodiniaceae density and chlorophyll a per cm2 as compared to corals transplanted at 45° and 90°. Our findings indicate that Dipsastraea cf. lizardensis and Platygyra spp. are potential candidates for transplantation at 0.5–0.6 m above CD, but not Poriteslutea due to high mortality. Future seawalls that are designed to incorporate coral transplants should consider including attachment surfaces angled at 45°or 90°.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.