Rachel E. Ward, Huanyuan Zhang-Zheng, Kate Abernethy, Stephen Adu-Bredu, Luzmilla Arroyo, Andrew Bailey, Jos Barlow, Erika Berenguer, Liana Chesini-Rossi, Percival Cho, Cecilia A. L. Dahlsjö, Eder Carvalho das Neves, Bianca de Oliveira Sales, William Farfan-Rios, Joice Nunes Ferreira, Renata Freitag, Cécile Girardin, Walter Huaraca Huasco, Carlos A. Joly, Yadvinder Malhi, Beatriz Marimon, Ben Hur Marimon Junior, Alexandra C. Morel, Helene C. Muller-Landau, Karine da Silva Peixoto, Simone Reis, Terhi Riutta, Norma Salinas, Marina Seixas, Miles R. Silman, Lara M. Kueppers
{"title":"森林年龄与气候竞争解释全球森林生态系统的生殖分配模式","authors":"Rachel E. Ward, Huanyuan Zhang-Zheng, Kate Abernethy, Stephen Adu-Bredu, Luzmilla Arroyo, Andrew Bailey, Jos Barlow, Erika Berenguer, Liana Chesini-Rossi, Percival Cho, Cecilia A. L. Dahlsjö, Eder Carvalho das Neves, Bianca de Oliveira Sales, William Farfan-Rios, Joice Nunes Ferreira, Renata Freitag, Cécile Girardin, Walter Huaraca Huasco, Carlos A. Joly, Yadvinder Malhi, Beatriz Marimon, Ben Hur Marimon Junior, Alexandra C. Morel, Helene C. Muller-Landau, Karine da Silva Peixoto, Simone Reis, Terhi Riutta, Norma Salinas, Marina Seixas, Miles R. Silman, Lara M. Kueppers","doi":"10.1111/ele.70191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest allocation of net primary productivity (NPP) to reproduction (carbon required for flowers, fruits, and seeds) is poorly quantified globally, despite its critical role in forest regeneration and a well-supported trade-off with allocation to growth. Here, we present the first global synthesis of a biometric proxy for forest reproductive allocation (RA) across environmental and stand age gradients from a compiled dataset of 824 observations across 393 sites. We find that ecosystem-scale RA increases ~60% from boreal to tropical forests. Climate shows important non-linear relationships with RA, but is not the sole predictor. Forest age effects are comparable to climate in magnitude (MAT: ß = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.021; old growth forest: ß = 0.22, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while metrics of soil fertility show small but significant relationships with RA (soil pH: ß = 0.07, <i>p</i> = 0.001; soil N: ß = −0.07, <i>p</i> = 0.001). These results provide strong evidence that ecosystem-scale RA is mediated by climate, forest age, and soil conditions, and is not a globally fixed fraction of positive NPP as assumed by most vegetation and ecosystem models. Our dataset and findings can be used by modellers to improve predictions of forest regeneration and carbon cycling.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70191","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest Age Rivals Climate to Explain Reproductive Allocation Patterns in Forest Ecosystems Globally\",\"authors\":\"Rachel E. Ward, Huanyuan Zhang-Zheng, Kate Abernethy, Stephen Adu-Bredu, Luzmilla Arroyo, Andrew Bailey, Jos Barlow, Erika Berenguer, Liana Chesini-Rossi, Percival Cho, Cecilia A. L. Dahlsjö, Eder Carvalho das Neves, Bianca de Oliveira Sales, William Farfan-Rios, Joice Nunes Ferreira, Renata Freitag, Cécile Girardin, Walter Huaraca Huasco, Carlos A. Joly, Yadvinder Malhi, Beatriz Marimon, Ben Hur Marimon Junior, Alexandra C. Morel, Helene C. Muller-Landau, Karine da Silva Peixoto, Simone Reis, Terhi Riutta, Norma Salinas, Marina Seixas, Miles R. Silman, Lara M. Kueppers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ele.70191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Forest allocation of net primary productivity (NPP) to reproduction (carbon required for flowers, fruits, and seeds) is poorly quantified globally, despite its critical role in forest regeneration and a well-supported trade-off with allocation to growth. Here, we present the first global synthesis of a biometric proxy for forest reproductive allocation (RA) across environmental and stand age gradients from a compiled dataset of 824 observations across 393 sites. We find that ecosystem-scale RA increases ~60% from boreal to tropical forests. Climate shows important non-linear relationships with RA, but is not the sole predictor. Forest age effects are comparable to climate in magnitude (MAT: ß = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.021; old growth forest: ß = 0.22, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while metrics of soil fertility show small but significant relationships with RA (soil pH: ß = 0.07, <i>p</i> = 0.001; soil N: ß = −0.07, <i>p</i> = 0.001). These results provide strong evidence that ecosystem-scale RA is mediated by climate, forest age, and soil conditions, and is not a globally fixed fraction of positive NPP as assumed by most vegetation and ecosystem models. Our dataset and findings can be used by modellers to improve predictions of forest regeneration and carbon cycling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"volume\":\"28 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70191\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70191\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70191","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管净初级生产力(NPP)对森林再生(花、果实和种子所需的碳)的分配在森林再生中起着关键作用,并且在全球范围内对其与生长分配之间的权衡得到了很好的支持,但在全球范围内对其进行量化的程度很低。在此,我们首次在全球范围内综合了森林生殖分配(RA)的生物特征代用物,该代用物来自393个站点的824个观测数据集。我们发现,从北方森林到热带森林,生态系统尺度的RA增加了约60%。气候与RA表现出重要的非线性关系,但不是唯一的预测因子。森林年龄的影响在程度上与气候相当(MAT: ß = 0.24, p = 0.021;老林:ß = 0.22, p < 0.001),而土壤肥力指标与RA的关系虽小但显著(土壤pH: ß = 0.07, p = 0.001;土壤N: ß = - 0.07, p = 0.001)。这些结果提供了强有力的证据,表明生态系统尺度的RA是由气候、森林年龄和土壤条件介导的,而不是大多数植被和生态系统模型所假设的正NPP的全球固定比例。我们的数据集和发现可以被建模者用来改进对森林再生和碳循环的预测。
Forest Age Rivals Climate to Explain Reproductive Allocation Patterns in Forest Ecosystems Globally
Forest allocation of net primary productivity (NPP) to reproduction (carbon required for flowers, fruits, and seeds) is poorly quantified globally, despite its critical role in forest regeneration and a well-supported trade-off with allocation to growth. Here, we present the first global synthesis of a biometric proxy for forest reproductive allocation (RA) across environmental and stand age gradients from a compiled dataset of 824 observations across 393 sites. We find that ecosystem-scale RA increases ~60% from boreal to tropical forests. Climate shows important non-linear relationships with RA, but is not the sole predictor. Forest age effects are comparable to climate in magnitude (MAT: ß = 0.24, p = 0.021; old growth forest: ß = 0.22, p < 0.001), while metrics of soil fertility show small but significant relationships with RA (soil pH: ß = 0.07, p = 0.001; soil N: ß = −0.07, p = 0.001). These results provide strong evidence that ecosystem-scale RA is mediated by climate, forest age, and soil conditions, and is not a globally fixed fraction of positive NPP as assumed by most vegetation and ecosystem models. Our dataset and findings can be used by modellers to improve predictions of forest regeneration and carbon cycling.
期刊介绍:
Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.