基于无人机图像和野外调查的闪电引起的冠层扰动模式量化研究

IF 1.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Biotropica Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI:10.1111/btp.70083
Raquel Fernandes Araujo, Evan M. Gora, Carlos H. S. Celes, Stephen P. Yanoviak, Helene C. Muller-Landau
{"title":"基于无人机图像和野外调查的闪电引起的冠层扰动模式量化研究","authors":"Raquel Fernandes Araujo,&nbsp;Evan M. Gora,&nbsp;Carlos H. S. Celes,&nbsp;Stephen P. Yanoviak,&nbsp;Helene C. Muller-Landau","doi":"10.1111/btp.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Lightning is an important agent of tree mortality and gap formation. Here we quantified spatial and temporal patterns of lightning-caused canopy disturbance in a 50-ha plot in Panama using monthly drone imagery, and compared these patterns with field measurements of disturbance severity and spatial extent. Of 22 lightning strikes that we tracked, the impacts of 18 were monitored for at least 12 months (range of 17–50 months), and 67% of these 18 strikes led to canopy disturbances. The mean time for the first and last canopy disturbance to appear post-strike was 8.2 months (range: 0.8–14 months) and 14.6 months (range: 0.8–23.9 months), respectively. Canopy disturbances were generally highly irregular in shape (i.e., not circular), and clustered around the rooting point of the directly struck tree. A mean of 43% (± 19%) of the total lightning-associated canopy disturbance area was within 10 m of the rooting point, whereas only 3% (± 5%) occurred 30–40 m from this point. Drone-based measurements of canopy disturbance area and volume were good predictors of variation in ground-estimated dead biomass (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.48 and 0.46, respectively), reflecting their strong association with overstory dead biomass (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.42 and 0.41, respectively). The total drone-estimated canopy disturbance area was 49% of the ground-estimated canopy disturbance area. Thus, lightning typically causes canopy disturbances that are detectable with drone imagery despite their irregular shape, and drone-detected gap formation lags 8–15 months poststrike, potentially disconnecting drone-detected disturbances from their ultimate cause.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"57 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Patterns of Lightning-Caused Canopy Disturbances via Integration of Drone Imagery and Field Surveys\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Fernandes Araujo,&nbsp;Evan M. Gora,&nbsp;Carlos H. S. Celes,&nbsp;Stephen P. Yanoviak,&nbsp;Helene C. Muller-Landau\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/btp.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Lightning is an important agent of tree mortality and gap formation. Here we quantified spatial and temporal patterns of lightning-caused canopy disturbance in a 50-ha plot in Panama using monthly drone imagery, and compared these patterns with field measurements of disturbance severity and spatial extent. Of 22 lightning strikes that we tracked, the impacts of 18 were monitored for at least 12 months (range of 17–50 months), and 67% of these 18 strikes led to canopy disturbances. The mean time for the first and last canopy disturbance to appear post-strike was 8.2 months (range: 0.8–14 months) and 14.6 months (range: 0.8–23.9 months), respectively. Canopy disturbances were generally highly irregular in shape (i.e., not circular), and clustered around the rooting point of the directly struck tree. A mean of 43% (± 19%) of the total lightning-associated canopy disturbance area was within 10 m of the rooting point, whereas only 3% (± 5%) occurred 30–40 m from this point. Drone-based measurements of canopy disturbance area and volume were good predictors of variation in ground-estimated dead biomass (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.48 and 0.46, respectively), reflecting their strong association with overstory dead biomass (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.42 and 0.41, respectively). The total drone-estimated canopy disturbance area was 49% of the ground-estimated canopy disturbance area. Thus, lightning typically causes canopy disturbances that are detectable with drone imagery despite their irregular shape, and drone-detected gap formation lags 8–15 months poststrike, potentially disconnecting drone-detected disturbances from their ultimate cause.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotropica\",\"volume\":\"57 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotropica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

闪电是导致树木死亡和林隙形成的重要因素。在这里,我们利用每月的无人机图像量化了巴拿马50公顷地块闪电引起的冠层扰动的时空格局,并将这些格局与扰动严重程度和空间范围的实地测量结果进行了比较。在我们追踪的22次雷击中,18次的影响被监测了至少12个月(范围为17-50个月),这18次雷击中有67%导致了冠层扰动。罢工后出现第一次和最后一次冠层扰动的平均时间分别为8.2个月(0.8 ~ 14个月)和14.6个月(0.8 ~ 23.9个月)。冠层扰动通常在形状上高度不规则(即非圆形),并聚集在直接撞击树木的生根点周围。平均43%(±19%)的雷击相关冠层扰动面积发生在生根点10 m以内,而只有3%(±5%)发生在生根点30-40 m以内。基于无人机的冠层扰动面积和体积测量值是地面估算死亡生物量变化的良好预测因子(r2分别为0.48和0.46),反映了它们与林冠层死亡生物量的强相关性(r2分别为0.42和0.41)。无人机估算的冠层扰动面积占地面估算的冠层扰动面积的49%。因此,闪电通常会引起树冠扰动,尽管它们的形状不规则,但无人机图像可以检测到这些扰动,而无人机检测到的缝隙形成滞后于闪电后8-15个月,这可能会将无人机检测到的扰动与其最终原因分离开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantifying Patterns of Lightning-Caused Canopy Disturbances via Integration of Drone Imagery and Field Surveys

Quantifying Patterns of Lightning-Caused Canopy Disturbances via Integration of Drone Imagery and Field Surveys

Lightning is an important agent of tree mortality and gap formation. Here we quantified spatial and temporal patterns of lightning-caused canopy disturbance in a 50-ha plot in Panama using monthly drone imagery, and compared these patterns with field measurements of disturbance severity and spatial extent. Of 22 lightning strikes that we tracked, the impacts of 18 were monitored for at least 12 months (range of 17–50 months), and 67% of these 18 strikes led to canopy disturbances. The mean time for the first and last canopy disturbance to appear post-strike was 8.2 months (range: 0.8–14 months) and 14.6 months (range: 0.8–23.9 months), respectively. Canopy disturbances were generally highly irregular in shape (i.e., not circular), and clustered around the rooting point of the directly struck tree. A mean of 43% (± 19%) of the total lightning-associated canopy disturbance area was within 10 m of the rooting point, whereas only 3% (± 5%) occurred 30–40 m from this point. Drone-based measurements of canopy disturbance area and volume were good predictors of variation in ground-estimated dead biomass (r2 = 0.48 and 0.46, respectively), reflecting their strong association with overstory dead biomass (r2 = 0.42 and 0.41, respectively). The total drone-estimated canopy disturbance area was 49% of the ground-estimated canopy disturbance area. Thus, lightning typically causes canopy disturbances that are detectable with drone imagery despite their irregular shape, and drone-detected gap formation lags 8–15 months poststrike, potentially disconnecting drone-detected disturbances from their ultimate cause.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biotropica
Biotropica 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信