地质样品的双能XCT表征:三种不同扫描仪的比较

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Margherita Martini, Pierre Francus, Laurenz Schröer, Florian Buyse, Pierre Kibleur, Veerle Cnudde, Leonardo Di Schiavi Trotta, Philippe Després
{"title":"地质样品的双能XCT表征:三种不同扫描仪的比较","authors":"Margherita Martini,&nbsp;Pierre Francus,&nbsp;Laurenz Schröer,&nbsp;Florian Buyse,&nbsp;Pierre Kibleur,&nbsp;Veerle Cnudde,&nbsp;Leonardo Di Schiavi Trotta,&nbsp;Philippe Després","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The stoichiometric calibration method for dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can be used in geosciences to characterise materials based on their effective atomic number (<i>Z</i><sub><i>eff</i></sub>) and their electron density (<i>ρ</i><sub><i>e</i></sub>) without previous knowledge of the incident X-ray beam. A stoichiometrically calibrated DECT method was applied here to measure these two properties on three different sedimentary rocks using three different X-ray CT instruments to determine which one is best to reveal the chemical composition or the mineralogical variations at the meso-scale. The three tested instruments: (1) a medical CT, (2) a custom-built micro-CT, and (3) a commercial micro-CT. Several acquisition settings were tested to identify the most suitable parameters for the characterisation the samples. Some parameters such as incident energies, resolution and calibration materials proved to have a significant impact on the accuracy of the characterisation. The determination of a general measurement protocol for geological samples was found to be difficult because of several complicating factors, including the nature of the sample, objectives of the study, and instrumental limitations that influence DECT characterisation. Nonetheless, comparison of the results obtained by the three scanners brings out the key parameters to be considered to perform a useful rock sample characterisation with DECT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"49 3","pages":"645-664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggr.12608","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterisation of Geological Samples with Dual-Energy XCT: A Comparison of Three Different Scanners\",\"authors\":\"Margherita Martini,&nbsp;Pierre Francus,&nbsp;Laurenz Schröer,&nbsp;Florian Buyse,&nbsp;Pierre Kibleur,&nbsp;Veerle Cnudde,&nbsp;Leonardo Di Schiavi Trotta,&nbsp;Philippe Després\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ggr.12608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The stoichiometric calibration method for dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can be used in geosciences to characterise materials based on their effective atomic number (<i>Z</i><sub><i>eff</i></sub>) and their electron density (<i>ρ</i><sub><i>e</i></sub>) without previous knowledge of the incident X-ray beam. A stoichiometrically calibrated DECT method was applied here to measure these two properties on three different sedimentary rocks using three different X-ray CT instruments to determine which one is best to reveal the chemical composition or the mineralogical variations at the meso-scale. The three tested instruments: (1) a medical CT, (2) a custom-built micro-CT, and (3) a commercial micro-CT. Several acquisition settings were tested to identify the most suitable parameters for the characterisation the samples. Some parameters such as incident energies, resolution and calibration materials proved to have a significant impact on the accuracy of the characterisation. The determination of a general measurement protocol for geological samples was found to be difficult because of several complicating factors, including the nature of the sample, objectives of the study, and instrumental limitations that influence DECT characterisation. Nonetheless, comparison of the results obtained by the three scanners brings out the key parameters to be considered to perform a useful rock sample characterisation with DECT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"645-664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggr.12608\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12608\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)的化学计量校准方法可以在地球科学中使用,根据有效原子序数(Zeff)和电子密度(ρe)来表征材料,而无需事先了解入射x射线束。本文采用化学计量校准的DECT方法,在三种不同的沉积岩上使用三种不同的x射线CT仪器来测量这两种性质,以确定哪种方法最能揭示中尺度的化学成分或矿物学变化。三种测试仪器:(1)医用CT,(2)定制微型CT,(3)商用微型CT。测试了几个采集设置,以确定最适合样品表征的参数。一些参数如入射能量、分辨率和校准材料被证明对表征的准确性有重大影响。由于几个复杂的因素,包括样品的性质、研究目标和影响DECT表征的仪器限制,确定地质样品的一般测量方案是很困难的。尽管如此,通过比较三种扫描仪获得的结果,得出了使用DECT进行有用的岩石样品表征所要考虑的关键参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Characterisation of Geological Samples with Dual-Energy XCT: A Comparison of Three Different Scanners

Characterisation of Geological Samples with Dual-Energy XCT: A Comparison of Three Different Scanners

The stoichiometric calibration method for dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can be used in geosciences to characterise materials based on their effective atomic number (Zeff) and their electron density (ρe) without previous knowledge of the incident X-ray beam. A stoichiometrically calibrated DECT method was applied here to measure these two properties on three different sedimentary rocks using three different X-ray CT instruments to determine which one is best to reveal the chemical composition or the mineralogical variations at the meso-scale. The three tested instruments: (1) a medical CT, (2) a custom-built micro-CT, and (3) a commercial micro-CT. Several acquisition settings were tested to identify the most suitable parameters for the characterisation the samples. Some parameters such as incident energies, resolution and calibration materials proved to have a significant impact on the accuracy of the characterisation. The determination of a general measurement protocol for geological samples was found to be difficult because of several complicating factors, including the nature of the sample, objectives of the study, and instrumental limitations that influence DECT characterisation. Nonetheless, comparison of the results obtained by the three scanners brings out the key parameters to be considered to perform a useful rock sample characterisation with DECT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信