非处方助听器的社交媒体视角:Twitter (X)数据的情感和主题分析

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Joel S. Feier, Matthew E. Lin, Matthew Awad, Aman M. Patel, Cindy Vu, John C. Parsons, Margaret Wallhagen, Janet S. Choi
{"title":"非处方助听器的社交媒体视角:Twitter (X)数据的情感和主题分析","authors":"Joel S. Feier,&nbsp;Matthew E. Lin,&nbsp;Matthew Awad,&nbsp;Aman M. Patel,&nbsp;Cindy Vu,&nbsp;John C. Parsons,&nbsp;Margaret Wallhagen,&nbsp;Janet S. Choi","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess public perspective on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids through social media data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twitter (X)'s Application Program Interface was utilized to collect English-language tweets mentioning OTC hearing aids between January 2019 and October 2022. Sentiment analysis was conducted using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner, categorizing tweets as positive, neutral, or negative. Main outcomes and measures were average compound sentiment scores. Joinpoint analysis was used to evaluate changes in sentiment scores over time. Two independent raters categorized account type and tweets into categories determined by thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 8912 tweets were included. The tweets were categorized as Economy, Political, Logistics, Information, and Other based on thematic analysis. Overall mean (SD) compound sentiment score (range: −1 to +1) was weakly positive at 0.15 (0.40). The total number of tweets increased significantly after August 2022, with 331 tweets in Q2 of 2022 and 2110 tweets in Q3 of 2022. There were no significant changes in sentiment scores over the study period. Economy received the highest average compound sentiment score of 0.21 (0.39), followed by Political 0.18 (0.46), Logistics 0.16 (0.41), Other 0.14 (0.39), and lastly Information 0.13 (0.36).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrated an increase in public awareness regarding OTC hearing aids in social media; although the sentiment toward them remained unchanged, reflecting mixed opinions on their benefits and challenges. Our findings highlight the need for more transparent and educational information, particularly given the increasing confusion accompanying the growing awareness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70242","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media Perspectives on Over-The-Counter Hearing Aids: Sentiment and Thematic Analysis of Twitter (X) Data\",\"authors\":\"Joel S. Feier,&nbsp;Matthew E. Lin,&nbsp;Matthew Awad,&nbsp;Aman M. Patel,&nbsp;Cindy Vu,&nbsp;John C. Parsons,&nbsp;Margaret Wallhagen,&nbsp;Janet S. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lio2.70242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess public perspective on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids through social media data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twitter (X)'s Application Program Interface was utilized to collect English-language tweets mentioning OTC hearing aids between January 2019 and October 2022. Sentiment analysis was conducted using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner, categorizing tweets as positive, neutral, or negative. Main outcomes and measures were average compound sentiment scores. Joinpoint analysis was used to evaluate changes in sentiment scores over time. Two independent raters categorized account type and tweets into categories determined by thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 8912 tweets were included. The tweets were categorized as Economy, Political, Logistics, Information, and Other based on thematic analysis. Overall mean (SD) compound sentiment score (range: −1 to +1) was weakly positive at 0.15 (0.40). The total number of tweets increased significantly after August 2022, with 331 tweets in Q2 of 2022 and 2110 tweets in Q3 of 2022. There were no significant changes in sentiment scores over the study period. Economy received the highest average compound sentiment score of 0.21 (0.39), followed by Political 0.18 (0.46), Logistics 0.16 (0.41), Other 0.14 (0.39), and lastly Information 0.13 (0.36).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study demonstrated an increase in public awareness regarding OTC hearing aids in social media; although the sentiment toward them remained unchanged, reflecting mixed opinions on their benefits and challenges. Our findings highlight the need for more transparent and educational information, particularly given the increasing confusion accompanying the growing awareness.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70242\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过社交媒体数据评估公众对非处方助听器的看法。方法利用Twitter (X)的应用程序接口收集2019年1月至2022年10月期间提到OTC助听器的英语推文。使用价感知词典和情绪推理器进行情绪分析,将tweet分类为积极,中性或消极。主要结果和测量是平均复合情绪得分。连接点分析用于评估情绪得分随时间的变化。两名独立评价者将账户类型和推文分为主题分析确定的类别。结果共纳入推文8912条。这些推文根据主题分析分为经济、政治、物流、信息、其他。总体平均(SD)复合情绪评分(范围:−1至+1)为0.15(0.40),呈弱正。2022年8月之后,推文总数显著增加,2022年第二季度为331条,第三季度为2110条。在研究期间,情绪得分没有显著变化。综合心理平均得分最高的是经济,为0.21分(0.39分),其后依次是政治0.18分(0.46分)、物流0.16分(0.41分)、其他0.14分(0.39分)、信息0.13分(0.36分)。本研究表明,公众在社交媒体上对非处方助听器的认识有所提高;尽管人们对它们的看法没有变化,但对它们的好处和挑战的看法不一。我们的研究结果强调需要更透明和教育的信息,特别是考虑到随着意识的提高而增加的混乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Social Media Perspectives on Over-The-Counter Hearing Aids: Sentiment and Thematic Analysis of Twitter (X) Data

Social Media Perspectives on Over-The-Counter Hearing Aids: Sentiment and Thematic Analysis of Twitter (X) Data

Objective

To assess public perspective on over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids through social media data.

Methods

Twitter (X)'s Application Program Interface was utilized to collect English-language tweets mentioning OTC hearing aids between January 2019 and October 2022. Sentiment analysis was conducted using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner, categorizing tweets as positive, neutral, or negative. Main outcomes and measures were average compound sentiment scores. Joinpoint analysis was used to evaluate changes in sentiment scores over time. Two independent raters categorized account type and tweets into categories determined by thematic analysis.

Results

A total of 8912 tweets were included. The tweets were categorized as Economy, Political, Logistics, Information, and Other based on thematic analysis. Overall mean (SD) compound sentiment score (range: −1 to +1) was weakly positive at 0.15 (0.40). The total number of tweets increased significantly after August 2022, with 331 tweets in Q2 of 2022 and 2110 tweets in Q3 of 2022. There were no significant changes in sentiment scores over the study period. Economy received the highest average compound sentiment score of 0.21 (0.39), followed by Political 0.18 (0.46), Logistics 0.16 (0.41), Other 0.14 (0.39), and lastly Information 0.13 (0.36).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated an increase in public awareness regarding OTC hearing aids in social media; although the sentiment toward them remained unchanged, reflecting mixed opinions on their benefits and challenges. Our findings highlight the need for more transparent and educational information, particularly given the increasing confusion accompanying the growing awareness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信