短暂失败后的阻力训练:在阻力训练队列中,过去部分失败与初始部分失败对小腿肌肉肥大的影响

IF 3
Stian Larsen, Nordis Ø. Sandberg, Brad J. Schoenfeld, Andrea B. Fredriksen, Benjamin S. Kristiansen, Milo Wolf, Roland van den Tillaar, Paul A. Swinton, Hallvard N. Falch
{"title":"短暂失败后的阻力训练:在阻力训练队列中,过去部分失败与初始部分失败对小腿肌肉肥大的影响","authors":"Stian Larsen,&nbsp;Nordis Ø. Sandberg,&nbsp;Brad J. Schoenfeld,&nbsp;Andrea B. Fredriksen,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Kristiansen,&nbsp;Milo Wolf,&nbsp;Roland van den Tillaar,&nbsp;Paul A. Swinton,&nbsp;Hallvard N. Falch","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study compared calf training with initial partial repetitions versus full range-of-motion (ROM) repetitions followed by past-failure partials on gastrocnemius hypertrophy. Twenty-three participants (men: <i>n</i> = 16 and women: <i>n</i> = 7) performed four sets of unilateral Smith machine calf raises to momentary failure twice a week for 8 weeks. One leg was trained using initial partials to their individualized maximum dorsiflexion ROM. The contralateral leg was trained with a full ROM and continued with past-failure partials after failure in peak plantarflexion. Medial gastrocnemius muscle thickness was measured with ultrasonography both baseline and postintervention. A Bayesian framework was used to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) using credible intervals and Bayes factors (BFs). The ATE posterior distribution indicated a greater increase in muscle hypertrophy for the initial partial condition (0.40 [95% CrI: −0.06 to 0.85 mm]; <i>p</i> (&gt; 0) = 0.958), with a BF of 1.2 suggesting “anecdotal” evidence in favor of an effect. Within-condition analyses using standardized mean difference estimates indicated that the interventions were likely to produce medium to large improvements. These findings suggest that both initial partials and past-failure partials are viable strategies for achieving gastrocnemius hypertrophy. Although the average change favored initial partials, the estimated difference was uncertain, and the Bayes factor provided only anecdotal support for a differential effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resistance Training Beyond Momentary Failure: The Effects of Past-Failure Partials Versus Initial Partials on Calf Muscle Hypertrophy Among a Resistance-Trained Cohort\",\"authors\":\"Stian Larsen,&nbsp;Nordis Ø. Sandberg,&nbsp;Brad J. Schoenfeld,&nbsp;Andrea B. Fredriksen,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Kristiansen,&nbsp;Milo Wolf,&nbsp;Roland van den Tillaar,&nbsp;Paul A. Swinton,&nbsp;Hallvard N. Falch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study compared calf training with initial partial repetitions versus full range-of-motion (ROM) repetitions followed by past-failure partials on gastrocnemius hypertrophy. Twenty-three participants (men: <i>n</i> = 16 and women: <i>n</i> = 7) performed four sets of unilateral Smith machine calf raises to momentary failure twice a week for 8 weeks. One leg was trained using initial partials to their individualized maximum dorsiflexion ROM. The contralateral leg was trained with a full ROM and continued with past-failure partials after failure in peak plantarflexion. Medial gastrocnemius muscle thickness was measured with ultrasonography both baseline and postintervention. A Bayesian framework was used to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) using credible intervals and Bayes factors (BFs). The ATE posterior distribution indicated a greater increase in muscle hypertrophy for the initial partial condition (0.40 [95% CrI: −0.06 to 0.85 mm]; <i>p</i> (&gt; 0) = 0.958), with a BF of 1.2 suggesting “anecdotal” evidence in favor of an effect. Within-condition analyses using standardized mean difference estimates indicated that the interventions were likely to produce medium to large improvements. These findings suggest that both initial partials and past-failure partials are viable strategies for achieving gastrocnemius hypertrophy. Although the average change favored initial partials, the estimated difference was uncertain, and the Bayes factor provided only anecdotal support for a differential effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70030\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究比较了小腿训练与初始部分重复和全活动范围(ROM)重复之后的腓肠肌肥厚部分失败。23名参与者(男性:n = 16,女性:n = 7)每周两次进行四组单侧史密斯机器小腿举至短暂失败,持续8周。一条腿使用初始部分训练到其个体化最大背屈ROM。对侧腿使用完整的ROM训练,并在跖屈峰值失败后继续使用过去失败的部分训练。在基线和干预后用超声测量腓肠肌内侧肌厚度。贝叶斯框架使用可信区间和贝叶斯因子(BFs)估计平均治疗效果(ATE)。ATE后向分布表明,在初始部分状态下,肌肉肥大的增加更大(0.40 [95% CrI:−0.06至0.85 mm]; p (> 0) = 0.958), BF为1.2表明“轶事”证据支持这种效应。使用标准化平均差异估计的条件内分析表明,干预措施可能产生中等到较大的改善。这些发现表明,初始部分切除和既往失败部分切除都是实现腓肠肌肥大的可行策略。虽然平均变化倾向于初始偏导数,但估计的差异是不确定的,贝叶斯因子仅为差异效应提供了轶事支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Resistance Training Beyond Momentary Failure: The Effects of Past-Failure Partials Versus Initial Partials on Calf Muscle Hypertrophy Among a Resistance-Trained Cohort

Resistance Training Beyond Momentary Failure: The Effects of Past-Failure Partials Versus Initial Partials on Calf Muscle Hypertrophy Among a Resistance-Trained Cohort

This study compared calf training with initial partial repetitions versus full range-of-motion (ROM) repetitions followed by past-failure partials on gastrocnemius hypertrophy. Twenty-three participants (men: n = 16 and women: n = 7) performed four sets of unilateral Smith machine calf raises to momentary failure twice a week for 8 weeks. One leg was trained using initial partials to their individualized maximum dorsiflexion ROM. The contralateral leg was trained with a full ROM and continued with past-failure partials after failure in peak plantarflexion. Medial gastrocnemius muscle thickness was measured with ultrasonography both baseline and postintervention. A Bayesian framework was used to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) using credible intervals and Bayes factors (BFs). The ATE posterior distribution indicated a greater increase in muscle hypertrophy for the initial partial condition (0.40 [95% CrI: −0.06 to 0.85 mm]; p (> 0) = 0.958), with a BF of 1.2 suggesting “anecdotal” evidence in favor of an effect. Within-condition analyses using standardized mean difference estimates indicated that the interventions were likely to produce medium to large improvements. These findings suggest that both initial partials and past-failure partials are viable strategies for achieving gastrocnemius hypertrophy. Although the average change favored initial partials, the estimated difference was uncertain, and the Bayes factor provided only anecdotal support for a differential effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信