Radia Kherchouche, Yasmina Rouchiche, Khaled Roubeche, Amal Sebaï
{"title":"阿尔及利亚东北部历史地震烈度资料的位置和震级","authors":"Radia Kherchouche, Yasmina Rouchiche, Khaled Roubeche, Amal Sebaï","doi":"10.1007/s11600-025-01631-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurately determining the location and magnitude of historical earthquakes is crucial for compiling a homogenized seismic catalogue, a key component of regional seismic hazard assessment. This study aims to test and validate the adapted Bakun and Wentworth (Bull Seismol Soc Am 87: 1502–1521, 1997) method on a test-set of 10 historical earthquakes in Algeria (1856–1946) with the aim of revising and updating the Earthquake Catalogue for Algeria (ECA). We calibrated the method using 1083 intensity observations from 14 training-set earthquakes (1949–2003). This approach estimates intensity magnitudes based on an attenuation model and determines the epicentral region by minimizing residuals over a predefined grid. To validate our results, we also tested the Boxer 4.2.1 software (Gasperini et al., Bull Seismol Soc Am 100: 2035–2066, 2010), based on Pasolini et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 98: 692–708, 2008) methods, which determine the intensity epicentre by maximizing the likelihood function of an attenuation equation and derives magnitude from an average of multiple estimates. While both methods generally produce comparable results in most cases, discrepancies arise for earthquakes with sparse historical intensity data or non-uniform intensity data distributions. The difference in results highlights the influence of data availability and methodological choices on the accuracy of computing earthquake parameters. Addressing these challenges requires refining intensity attenuation models, expanding macroseismic data collection and integrating historical and instrumental records. These improvements will enhance the reliability of seismic hazard assessments and contribute to a more robust understanding of the seismic activity in Algeria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"73 5","pages":"3869 - 3887"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Location and magnitude from seismic intensity data of historical earthquakes in north-eastern Algeria\",\"authors\":\"Radia Kherchouche, Yasmina Rouchiche, Khaled Roubeche, Amal Sebaï\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11600-025-01631-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accurately determining the location and magnitude of historical earthquakes is crucial for compiling a homogenized seismic catalogue, a key component of regional seismic hazard assessment. This study aims to test and validate the adapted Bakun and Wentworth (Bull Seismol Soc Am 87: 1502–1521, 1997) method on a test-set of 10 historical earthquakes in Algeria (1856–1946) with the aim of revising and updating the Earthquake Catalogue for Algeria (ECA). We calibrated the method using 1083 intensity observations from 14 training-set earthquakes (1949–2003). This approach estimates intensity magnitudes based on an attenuation model and determines the epicentral region by minimizing residuals over a predefined grid. To validate our results, we also tested the Boxer 4.2.1 software (Gasperini et al., Bull Seismol Soc Am 100: 2035–2066, 2010), based on Pasolini et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 98: 692–708, 2008) methods, which determine the intensity epicentre by maximizing the likelihood function of an attenuation equation and derives magnitude from an average of multiple estimates. While both methods generally produce comparable results in most cases, discrepancies arise for earthquakes with sparse historical intensity data or non-uniform intensity data distributions. The difference in results highlights the influence of data availability and methodological choices on the accuracy of computing earthquake parameters. Addressing these challenges requires refining intensity attenuation models, expanding macroseismic data collection and integrating historical and instrumental records. These improvements will enhance the reliability of seismic hazard assessments and contribute to a more robust understanding of the seismic activity in Algeria.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"3869 - 3887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-025-01631-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-025-01631-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
准确确定历史地震的位置和震级是编制均匀地震目录的关键,是区域地震危险性评估的重要组成部分。本研究旨在测试和验证Bakun和Wentworth (Bull Seismol Soc Am 87: 1502-1521, 1997)在阿尔及利亚(1856-1946)10次历史地震的测试集上采用的方法,目的是修订和更新阿尔及利亚地震目录(ECA)。我们使用了来自14次训练集地震(1949-2003)的1083次强度观测数据对方法进行了校准。该方法基于衰减模型估计烈度,并通过最小化预定义网格上的残差来确定震中区域。为了验证我们的结果,我们还测试了Boxer 4.2.1软件(Gasperini等人,Bull Seismol Soc Am 100: 2035-2066, 2010),该软件基于Pasolini等人(Bull Seismol Soc Am 98: 692-708, 2008)的方法,该方法通过最大化衰减方程的可能性函数来确定震中强度,并从多个估计的平均值中得出震级。虽然这两种方法在大多数情况下通常产生可比较的结果,但对于历史强度数据稀疏或强度数据分布不均匀的地震,会产生差异。结果的差异突出了数据可用性和方法选择对地震参数计算精度的影响。解决这些挑战需要完善强度衰减模型,扩大宏观地震数据收集,整合历史和仪器记录。这些改进将提高地震灾害评估的可靠性,并有助于更有力地了解阿尔及利亚的地震活动。
Location and magnitude from seismic intensity data of historical earthquakes in north-eastern Algeria
Accurately determining the location and magnitude of historical earthquakes is crucial for compiling a homogenized seismic catalogue, a key component of regional seismic hazard assessment. This study aims to test and validate the adapted Bakun and Wentworth (Bull Seismol Soc Am 87: 1502–1521, 1997) method on a test-set of 10 historical earthquakes in Algeria (1856–1946) with the aim of revising and updating the Earthquake Catalogue for Algeria (ECA). We calibrated the method using 1083 intensity observations from 14 training-set earthquakes (1949–2003). This approach estimates intensity magnitudes based on an attenuation model and determines the epicentral region by minimizing residuals over a predefined grid. To validate our results, we also tested the Boxer 4.2.1 software (Gasperini et al., Bull Seismol Soc Am 100: 2035–2066, 2010), based on Pasolini et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 98: 692–708, 2008) methods, which determine the intensity epicentre by maximizing the likelihood function of an attenuation equation and derives magnitude from an average of multiple estimates. While both methods generally produce comparable results in most cases, discrepancies arise for earthquakes with sparse historical intensity data or non-uniform intensity data distributions. The difference in results highlights the influence of data availability and methodological choices on the accuracy of computing earthquake parameters. Addressing these challenges requires refining intensity attenuation models, expanding macroseismic data collection and integrating historical and instrumental records. These improvements will enhance the reliability of seismic hazard assessments and contribute to a more robust understanding of the seismic activity in Algeria.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.