基于多元NNLS-VCE的GNSS时间序列随机模型识别

IF 2.1 4区 地球科学
Forouzan Ghasser-Mobarakeh, Behzad Voosoghi, Alireza Amiri-Simkooei
{"title":"基于多元NNLS-VCE的GNSS时间序列随机模型识别","authors":"Forouzan Ghasser-Mobarakeh,&nbsp;Behzad Voosoghi,&nbsp;Alireza Amiri-Simkooei","doi":"10.1007/s11600-025-01577-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Identifying the correct stochastic model in GNSS time series is essential to study geophysical parameters such as site velocities, and hence enhancing their accuracy. The rate uncertainty is a critical aspect in GNSS time series analysis. The variance component estimation (VCE) methods commonly utilize unconstrained estimation principles. Simulating 1000-time series for 4 different noise combinations with 10 years’ time span, we have investigated the performance of non-negative least squares VCE (NNLS-VCE) method for identifying an appropriate noise model. Our results are provided for both univariate and multivariate analysis. As the noise model's complexity increases, the significance of employing multivariate analysis is prominent in contrast to univariate analysis. After thorough analysis, we have determined that treating the false-positive model as a stochastic model in time series yields significant insights. Specifically, if the accumulative spectral index is lower than the true value, it results in an underestimation of the rate uncertainty. Conversely, if the index is higher than the actual value, it leads to an overestimation. Additionally, we observed that as the noise model complexity increases, the number of false-positive models also increases. However, the implementation of multivariate analysis mitigates this increase, offering a more realistic and reliable approach. In case of four distinct noise models, the detection power percentages of 98.5%, 90.5%, 69.5%, 29.3% of univariate analysis increased to 99.5%, 99.8%, 88.4% and 83.7% for multivariate analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"73 5","pages":"3737 - 3752"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stochastic model identification of GNSS time series using multivariate NNLS-VCE\",\"authors\":\"Forouzan Ghasser-Mobarakeh,&nbsp;Behzad Voosoghi,&nbsp;Alireza Amiri-Simkooei\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11600-025-01577-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Identifying the correct stochastic model in GNSS time series is essential to study geophysical parameters such as site velocities, and hence enhancing their accuracy. The rate uncertainty is a critical aspect in GNSS time series analysis. The variance component estimation (VCE) methods commonly utilize unconstrained estimation principles. Simulating 1000-time series for 4 different noise combinations with 10 years’ time span, we have investigated the performance of non-negative least squares VCE (NNLS-VCE) method for identifying an appropriate noise model. Our results are provided for both univariate and multivariate analysis. As the noise model's complexity increases, the significance of employing multivariate analysis is prominent in contrast to univariate analysis. After thorough analysis, we have determined that treating the false-positive model as a stochastic model in time series yields significant insights. Specifically, if the accumulative spectral index is lower than the true value, it results in an underestimation of the rate uncertainty. Conversely, if the index is higher than the actual value, it leads to an overestimation. Additionally, we observed that as the noise model complexity increases, the number of false-positive models also increases. However, the implementation of multivariate analysis mitigates this increase, offering a more realistic and reliable approach. In case of four distinct noise models, the detection power percentages of 98.5%, 90.5%, 69.5%, 29.3% of univariate analysis increased to 99.5%, 99.8%, 88.4% and 83.7% for multivariate analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"3737 - 3752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-025-01577-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-025-01577-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在GNSS时间序列中识别正确的随机模型对于研究测点速度等地球物理参数,从而提高其准确性至关重要。速率不确定性是GNSS时间序列分析中的一个重要方面。方差分量估计(VCE)方法通常采用无约束估计原理。模拟4种不同噪声组合的1000时间序列,研究了非负最小二乘VCE (NNLS-VCE)方法识别合适噪声模型的性能。我们的结果提供了单变量和多变量分析。随着噪声模型复杂性的增加,采用多变量分析的意义比单变量分析更加突出。经过深入分析,我们确定将假阳性模型作为时间序列中的随机模型处理可以产生重要的见解。具体来说,如果累积光谱指数低于真实值,则会导致速率不确定度的低估。相反,如果该指标高于实际值,则会导致高估。此外,我们观察到,随着噪声模型复杂性的增加,假阳性模型的数量也增加。然而,多变量分析的实现减轻了这种增加,提供了一种更现实和可靠的方法。在4种不同噪声模型下,单因素分析的检出率从98.5%、90.5%、69.5%、29.3%提高到多因素分析的99.5%、99.8%、88.4%、83.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stochastic model identification of GNSS time series using multivariate NNLS-VCE

Identifying the correct stochastic model in GNSS time series is essential to study geophysical parameters such as site velocities, and hence enhancing their accuracy. The rate uncertainty is a critical aspect in GNSS time series analysis. The variance component estimation (VCE) methods commonly utilize unconstrained estimation principles. Simulating 1000-time series for 4 different noise combinations with 10 years’ time span, we have investigated the performance of non-negative least squares VCE (NNLS-VCE) method for identifying an appropriate noise model. Our results are provided for both univariate and multivariate analysis. As the noise model's complexity increases, the significance of employing multivariate analysis is prominent in contrast to univariate analysis. After thorough analysis, we have determined that treating the false-positive model as a stochastic model in time series yields significant insights. Specifically, if the accumulative spectral index is lower than the true value, it results in an underestimation of the rate uncertainty. Conversely, if the index is higher than the actual value, it leads to an overestimation. Additionally, we observed that as the noise model complexity increases, the number of false-positive models also increases. However, the implementation of multivariate analysis mitigates this increase, offering a more realistic and reliable approach. In case of four distinct noise models, the detection power percentages of 98.5%, 90.5%, 69.5%, 29.3% of univariate analysis increased to 99.5%, 99.8%, 88.4% and 83.7% for multivariate analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geophysica
Acta Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
251
期刊介绍: Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信