Chong Wang , Ning Luo , Jiangang Liu , Yanru Fang , Zhiming Qi , Shuo Li , Zhenzhen Gao , Yupeng Feng , Qingquan Chu , Hancheng Dai
{"title":"以数据为导向的战略,在维持全球水稻生产的同时减轻温室气体排放强度","authors":"Chong Wang , Ning Luo , Jiangang Liu , Yanru Fang , Zhiming Qi , Shuo Li , Zhenzhen Gao , Yupeng Feng , Qingquan Chu , Hancheng Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Greenhouse gas emissions intensity (GHGI, carbon dioxide equivalent emissions per unit grain yield) is a holistic metric to measure agricultural productivity and environmental risks. However, the potential for GHGI mitigation in global rice fields, considering diverse management practices and their spatial patterns, remains poorly understood. Here, using a data-driven approach, we scaled site-level observations to the global grid to quantify GHGI responses to various management practices. Global assessment demonstrated that four out of ten key management practices, including enhanced efficiency fertilizer, deep fertilization, biochar amendment, and non-continuous irrigation, reduced GHGI by 20.7–54.5 % while boosting rice yield by 3.3–10.6 %. These benefits were equivalent to carbon dioxide removal of 156.9–412.3 million tons and additional rice production of 25.8–81.5 million tons. Our findings identify key strategies that simultaneously reduce GHGI and maintain rice yield, highlighting the critical role and vast potential of sustainable solutions in supporting climate-smart rice production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 108547"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-driven strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions intensity while sustaining global rice production\",\"authors\":\"Chong Wang , Ning Luo , Jiangang Liu , Yanru Fang , Zhiming Qi , Shuo Li , Zhenzhen Gao , Yupeng Feng , Qingquan Chu , Hancheng Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Greenhouse gas emissions intensity (GHGI, carbon dioxide equivalent emissions per unit grain yield) is a holistic metric to measure agricultural productivity and environmental risks. However, the potential for GHGI mitigation in global rice fields, considering diverse management practices and their spatial patterns, remains poorly understood. Here, using a data-driven approach, we scaled site-level observations to the global grid to quantify GHGI responses to various management practices. Global assessment demonstrated that four out of ten key management practices, including enhanced efficiency fertilizer, deep fertilization, biochar amendment, and non-continuous irrigation, reduced GHGI by 20.7–54.5 % while boosting rice yield by 3.3–10.6 %. These benefits were equivalent to carbon dioxide removal of 156.9–412.3 million tons and additional rice production of 25.8–81.5 million tons. Our findings identify key strategies that simultaneously reduce GHGI and maintain rice yield, highlighting the critical role and vast potential of sustainable solutions in supporting climate-smart rice production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004240\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Data-driven strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions intensity while sustaining global rice production
Greenhouse gas emissions intensity (GHGI, carbon dioxide equivalent emissions per unit grain yield) is a holistic metric to measure agricultural productivity and environmental risks. However, the potential for GHGI mitigation in global rice fields, considering diverse management practices and their spatial patterns, remains poorly understood. Here, using a data-driven approach, we scaled site-level observations to the global grid to quantify GHGI responses to various management practices. Global assessment demonstrated that four out of ten key management practices, including enhanced efficiency fertilizer, deep fertilization, biochar amendment, and non-continuous irrigation, reduced GHGI by 20.7–54.5 % while boosting rice yield by 3.3–10.6 %. These benefits were equivalent to carbon dioxide removal of 156.9–412.3 million tons and additional rice production of 25.8–81.5 million tons. Our findings identify key strategies that simultaneously reduce GHGI and maintain rice yield, highlighting the critical role and vast potential of sustainable solutions in supporting climate-smart rice production.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.