社区中绿色开放空间与社会互动之间的关系：系统的文献综述

IF 6.7 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128991

Chunyan Yang , Kun Wang , Song Shi , Xiao Ma

{"title":"社区中绿色开放空间与社会互动之间的关系：系统的文献综述","authors":"Chunyan Yang , Kun Wang , Song Shi , Xiao Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green Open Space (GOS) plays an important role in enhancing urban sustainability and liveability. GOS has been proven to provide various benefits for social sustainability in neighbourhoods. However, there are significant gaps in understanding the relationships between GOSs and social interaction in neighbourhoods. This study aims to exploring of the relationships between GOSs and social interaction in neighbourhoods through a systematic review. Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched in July 2024. In total, 42 articles were selected for a qualitative synthesis of the outcomes on the topic. This systematic review identified four themes and twelve specific sub-themes on the topic: 1) frequency of GOS use (frequency of GOS visits; duration of GOS use), 2) quantity and spatial patterns of GOSs (amount of GOSs; size of GOSs; GOSs’ spatial patterns), 3) quality of GOS spaces (quality of nature, recreation, sport spaces, and amenities), and 4) pedestrian environment of GOSs (walking accessibility to GOSs; quality of walking paths; and pedestrian connectivity). The paper presents a framework for summarizing the key findings of the major GOS-related factors influencing social interaction. It provides insights for policymakers, developers, and urban planners in city and neighbourhood planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 128991"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between green open spaces and social interaction in neighbourhoods: a systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Chunyan Yang , Kun Wang , Song Shi , Xiao Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Green Open Space (GOS) plays an important role in enhancing urban sustainability and liveability. GOS has been proven to provide various benefits for social sustainability in neighbourhoods. However, there are significant gaps in understanding the relationships between GOSs and social interaction in neighbourhoods. This study aims to exploring of the relationships between GOSs and social interaction in neighbourhoods through a systematic review. Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched in July 2024. In total, 42 articles were selected for a qualitative synthesis of the outcomes on the topic. This systematic review identified four themes and twelve specific sub-themes on the topic: 1) frequency of GOS use (frequency of GOS visits; duration of GOS use), 2) quantity and spatial patterns of GOSs (amount of GOSs; size of GOSs; GOSs’ spatial patterns), 3) quality of GOS spaces (quality of nature, recreation, sport spaces, and amenities), and 4) pedestrian environment of GOSs (walking accessibility to GOSs; quality of walking paths; and pedestrian connectivity). The paper presents a framework for summarizing the key findings of the major GOS-related factors influencing social interaction. It provides insights for policymakers, developers, and urban planners in city and neighbourhood planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 128991\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003255\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色开放空间在提高城市可持续性和宜居性方面发挥着重要作用。事实证明，GOS为社区的社会可持续发展提供了各种好处。然而，在理解政府服务与社区社会互动之间的关系方面存在重大差距。本研究旨在通过系统回顾的方式，探讨社区政府服务与社区社会互动之间的关系。Web of Science和Scopus数据库于2024年7月检索。总共选择了42篇文章对该主题的结果进行定性综合。本系统综述确定了四个主题和十二个具体的子主题：1)使用频率（访问频率；使用时间），2)政府政府的数量和空间格局（政府政府的数量，政府政府的规模，政府政府的空间格局），3)政府政府空间质量（自然，娱乐，运动空间和设施的质量），以及4)政府政府政府的步行环境（步行可达性，步行路径质量和行人连通性）。本文提出了一个框架，总结了影响社会互动的主要政府组织相关因素的主要发现。它为政策制定者、开发商和城市规划者在城市和社区规划方面提供了见解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Associations between green open spaces and social interaction in neighbourhoods: a systematic literature review

Green Open Space (GOS) plays an important role in enhancing urban sustainability and liveability. GOS has been proven to provide various benefits for social sustainability in neighbourhoods. However, there are significant gaps in understanding the relationships between GOSs and social interaction in neighbourhoods. This study aims to exploring of the relationships between GOSs and social interaction in neighbourhoods through a systematic review. Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched in July 2024. In total, 42 articles were selected for a qualitative synthesis of the outcomes on the topic. This systematic review identified four themes and twelve specific sub-themes on the topic: 1) frequency of GOS use (frequency of GOS visits; duration of GOS use), 2) quantity and spatial patterns of GOSs (amount of GOSs; size of GOSs; GOSs’ spatial patterns), 3) quality of GOS spaces (quality of nature, recreation, sport spaces, and amenities), and 4) pedestrian environment of GOSs (walking accessibility to GOSs; quality of walking paths; and pedestrian connectivity). The paper presents a framework for summarizing the key findings of the major GOS-related factors influencing social interaction. It provides insights for policymakers, developers, and urban planners in city and neighbourhood planning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Urban Forestry & Urban Greening FORESTRY-

CiteScore

11.70

自引率

12.50%

发文量

289

审稿时长

70 days

期刊介绍： Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.