反动作深度对反动作跳跃关节配合及地面反作用力波形的影响

Mona Makita, Shinichi Kawamoto, Momoko Nagai-Tanima, Tomoki Aoyama
{"title":"反动作深度对反动作跳跃关节配合及地面反作用力波形的影响","authors":"Mona Makita,&nbsp;Shinichi Kawamoto,&nbsp;Momoko Nagai-Tanima,&nbsp;Tomoki Aoyama","doi":"10.1016/j.bea.2025.100190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ground reaction force (GRF) waveform during countermovement jumps (CMJs) is considered to reflect neuromuscular coordination strategies; yet the biomechanical mechanisms distinguishing unimodal from bimodal patterns remain unclear. This study investigated the influence of countermovement depth and velocity on GRF waveform shape and examined their relationship with joint moments and work. Twenty-six healthy young women (age: 22.1 ± 1.1 years; height: 160.8 ± 4.0 cm; body weight: 53.5 ± 5.6 kg) performed CMJs, and GRF waveforms were categorised as unimodal and bimodal patterns. Jump-related variables, joint moments, and work were analysed. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted using countermovement depth as a covariate, and correlation analyses examined the associations between depth and biomechanical parameters. Compared with the unimodal group, the bimodal group exhibited a significantly greater countermovement depth, with no significant difference in countermovement velocity. Before adjustment, knee joint work and ankle joint moments differed significantly between groups; however, these differences were no longer evident after adjusting for countermovement depth, indicating that it was a confounding factor. Correlation analyses demonstrated that a greater countermovement was associated with increased hip and knee joint work and reduced ankle joint contribution. These findings indicate that GRF waveform shape in CMJ is determined primarily by countermovement depth rather than velocity. The unimodal pattern reflected ankle-dominant simultaneous output, whereas the bimodal pattern reflected proximal joint-dominant sequential output. This study highlights the role of joint-specific coordination strategies and offers insight for developing individualised training and rehabilitation approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72384,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering advances","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of countermovement depth on joint coordination and ground reaction force waveform in countermovement jump\",\"authors\":\"Mona Makita,&nbsp;Shinichi Kawamoto,&nbsp;Momoko Nagai-Tanima,&nbsp;Tomoki Aoyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bea.2025.100190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The ground reaction force (GRF) waveform during countermovement jumps (CMJs) is considered to reflect neuromuscular coordination strategies; yet the biomechanical mechanisms distinguishing unimodal from bimodal patterns remain unclear. This study investigated the influence of countermovement depth and velocity on GRF waveform shape and examined their relationship with joint moments and work. Twenty-six healthy young women (age: 22.1 ± 1.1 years; height: 160.8 ± 4.0 cm; body weight: 53.5 ± 5.6 kg) performed CMJs, and GRF waveforms were categorised as unimodal and bimodal patterns. Jump-related variables, joint moments, and work were analysed. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted using countermovement depth as a covariate, and correlation analyses examined the associations between depth and biomechanical parameters. Compared with the unimodal group, the bimodal group exhibited a significantly greater countermovement depth, with no significant difference in countermovement velocity. Before adjustment, knee joint work and ankle joint moments differed significantly between groups; however, these differences were no longer evident after adjusting for countermovement depth, indicating that it was a confounding factor. Correlation analyses demonstrated that a greater countermovement was associated with increased hip and knee joint work and reduced ankle joint contribution. These findings indicate that GRF waveform shape in CMJ is determined primarily by countermovement depth rather than velocity. The unimodal pattern reflected ankle-dominant simultaneous output, whereas the bimodal pattern reflected proximal joint-dominant sequential output. This study highlights the role of joint-specific coordination strategies and offers insight for developing individualised training and rehabilitation approaches.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical engineering advances\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical engineering advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667099225000465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667099225000465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反动作跳跃(CMJs)时的地面反作用力(GRF)波形被认为反映了神经肌肉协调策略;然而,区分单峰与双峰模式的生物力学机制仍不清楚。研究了反运动深度和反运动速度对GRF波形形态的影响,并考察了反运动深度和反运动速度与关节力矩和功的关系。26名健康年轻女性(年龄:22.1±1.1岁,身高:160.8±4.0 cm,体重:53.5±5.6 kg)进行了CMJs, GRF波形分为单峰和双峰两种。分析了跳跃相关变量、关节力矩和功。采用反运动深度作为协变量进行协方差分析(ANCOVA),相关分析考察深度与生物力学参数之间的关系。与单峰组相比,双峰组的反动作深度显著增加,反动作速度无显著差异。调整前,两组间膝关节功、踝关节力矩差异有统计学意义;然而,在调整了反向移动深度后,这些差异不再明显,表明这是一个混杂因素。相关分析表明,更大的反向运动与髋关节和膝关节工作增加和踝关节贡献减少有关。这些结果表明,CMJ中的GRF波形形状主要由反运动深度而不是速度决定。单峰模式反映踝关节为主的同时输出,而双峰模式反映近端关节为主的顺序输出。这项研究强调了特定关节协调策略的作用,并为制定个性化的训练和康复方法提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of countermovement depth on joint coordination and ground reaction force waveform in countermovement jump
The ground reaction force (GRF) waveform during countermovement jumps (CMJs) is considered to reflect neuromuscular coordination strategies; yet the biomechanical mechanisms distinguishing unimodal from bimodal patterns remain unclear. This study investigated the influence of countermovement depth and velocity on GRF waveform shape and examined their relationship with joint moments and work. Twenty-six healthy young women (age: 22.1 ± 1.1 years; height: 160.8 ± 4.0 cm; body weight: 53.5 ± 5.6 kg) performed CMJs, and GRF waveforms were categorised as unimodal and bimodal patterns. Jump-related variables, joint moments, and work were analysed. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted using countermovement depth as a covariate, and correlation analyses examined the associations between depth and biomechanical parameters. Compared with the unimodal group, the bimodal group exhibited a significantly greater countermovement depth, with no significant difference in countermovement velocity. Before adjustment, knee joint work and ankle joint moments differed significantly between groups; however, these differences were no longer evident after adjusting for countermovement depth, indicating that it was a confounding factor. Correlation analyses demonstrated that a greater countermovement was associated with increased hip and knee joint work and reduced ankle joint contribution. These findings indicate that GRF waveform shape in CMJ is determined primarily by countermovement depth rather than velocity. The unimodal pattern reflected ankle-dominant simultaneous output, whereas the bimodal pattern reflected proximal joint-dominant sequential output. This study highlights the role of joint-specific coordination strategies and offers insight for developing individualised training and rehabilitation approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical engineering advances
Biomedical engineering advances Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信